In his book, Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social Worlds (1995, Routledge), Ken Plummer explains that when individuals narrate seemingly internal and personal stories about their sexuality, these aren’t very individual or internal at all. Rather, such narratives emerge in themes that are made possible due to specific cultural and political conditions; sexual stories are thus part of larger sexual storytelling culture, and can be understood and made meaningful and visible only via existing cultural frames.
In 1995 Plummer documented three kinds of emerging sexual stories: rape stories, coming out stories, and recovery stories. The year of 2009 brought several unique opportunities of its own to tell sexual stories. Some of these stories reaffirmed and revisited familiar plots to “old” sexual stories, while some forged new territory. We have decided to group this year’s stories (which we have selected with a highly subjective and US based lens) into themes; each theme is a compilation of several individual stories, forming what we see as a larger set of cultural stories being told about the pleasures and dangers of sexuality, and the roles of social institutions in regulating and redefining normative sexual boundaries. Thanks to Phil Cohen, Holly Lewandowski, and Amanda Hess for story leads. Also, thanks to RhReality Check’s Amy Newman for her list of top stories from 2009 (from which we borrowed a few).
#10. “Squeaky-clean”-men-who-cheat stories, starring Tiger Woods!
In her recent article on Tiger Woods, Shari Dworkin debunks widespread psychological and “sex addiction” explanations for Tiger Woods’ affairs:
“Recent media coverage of Tiger Woods’ marital “transgressions” is overflowing. Some argue that Tiger is sex obsessed and has a “sex addiction” given his high sex drive and desire for sex with many women over time. Others argue that any sports star who is on the road and away from home so much has a huge chance of being unfaithful to their wife. (Some media reports argue that it is “rare” to find a faithful male sports star). Still others argue that Tiger Woods’ late father pressed him down under his thumb too much as a youngster and upon his death, Tiger unleashed his “wild side.” Finally, some news reporters offer that Tiger was “traumatized” as a child when his father cheated on his mother, and that he must just be paradoxically following in dad’s footsteps. But very little media coverage attempts to press beyond an individual level and not many articles offered a much needed broader analysis of masculinity, race, sport, sexuality, and media.”
- Similar structural and cultural analyses incorporating masculinity and institutional/political power could and should also be applied to the other stars of this story, including: Mark Sanford, John Ensign, & John Edwards.
- Additionally, a cross-cultural perspective is needed here as well (e.g. why are these stories so powerful and shaming in the US, but not in European countries?)
#9. Gay-marriage-success stories, starring: Argentina!
According to The Guardian: “In Latin America policies and attitudes have mellowed over the past two decades and in most countries it is now illegal to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Buenos Aires, Bogota and Mexico City boast gay pride parades and gay-friendly districts where same-sex couples can kiss and hold hands in public. Yesterday Di Bello, 41, and Freyre, 39, became the continent’s first gay married couple. The pair sidestepped a court ruling blocking their wedding in Buenos Aires by holding the ceremony in Ushuaia, capital of Tierra del Fuego province and the world’s southernmost city. They exchanged rings at a civil ceremony witnessed by state and federal officials, prompting jubilation by gay rights activists and consternation from the Catholic church. “My knees didn’t stop shaking,” said Di Bello. “We are the first gay couple in Latin America to marry” (Guardian.co.uk — Dec. 29, 2009).
Gay-marriage- success stories from 2009 also starred: Mexico City, Washington DC, New Hampshire, Sweden, Iowa, Vermont, and Norway. These are just the states, countries, and cities adopting gay marriage in 2009 and doesn’t include the longer list of locales which legalized domestic partnership in 2009. [The appendix to this is the Gay-Marriage-doom-&-gloom story: starring the Catholic Church (Maine) & the Mormon Church (California, from 2008)]
#8. Multiple-birth stories, starring: Angela Suleman (aka Octo-mom!)
While more women are having multiple-baby births (thanks to IVF technology), not all multiple-birth mothers are viewed the same. Kathryn Joyce from RhReality Check offers an insightful comparison between the highly demonized Angela Suleman (“octo-mom”) and a “Reality TV” family with 18 children:
“Suleman’s newborns were delivered, as it were, into a pop cultural moment of preoccupation with large families. Reality TV shows about families with many children abound on TV’s TLC channel, most notably with the chronicles of the 18-child Duggar family. That the Duggars are grounded in and motivated by the pro-patriarchy Quiverfull movement, with its emphasis on female submission and male headship, is breezily dispensed with in favor of dwelling on the sentimental and zany experiences of life in a 20-person family. “Jon and Kate Plus Eight,” another reality TV show about a large family – this one the result of sextuplets born to a mother who, like Suleman, chose not to selectively reduce the number of embryos that “took” during an IVF treatment – is less burdened by the extremist ideology that undergirds the Duggars’ convictions, but still presents a traditional picture of large family life, with married heterosexual parents and a stay-at-home mother. …. While many observers are concerned with her apparent inability to support such a large family, the fact that she is unmarried has alone been cause enough for others to declare her family a situation of de facto child abuse” (for Joyce’s full article click here).
#7. Homo-hater stories, starring: conservative religious anti-gay activists in Uganda and the US!
In a recent post on Uganda’s “Kill the Gays” bill, Kari Lerum wrote that:
“…there is an increasing amount of scrutiny and disgust from many regarding the direct connection between the Ugandan anti-homosexual campaign and a conservative U.S. religious group called “The Family” — which some, including The Observer have called a ” cult” due to the requirement for core members to remain secret about their activities. Regardless of what the group is labeled, it is clear that it has been successful in recruiting high level political leaders including some US congressmen and Uganda’s president Museveni to its core values: “fighting homosexuality and abortion, promoting free-market economics and dictatorship, an idea they once termed ‘totalitarianism for Christ’ ”
#6. Catholic-priest-cover-up stories, starring: the Irish Catholic Church!
As quoted in the LA Times: “Leaders of the Roman Catholic Church in Dublin engaged in a widespread cover-up of abuses by clergy members for decades, a “scandal on an astonishing scale” that even saw officials taking out insurance policies to protect dioceses against future claims by the victims, a commission reported Thursday after a three-year investigation” (see full article here)
Ross Douthat, a conservative writer for the New York Times and the National Review, describes how a culture of fear around sexuality is precisely the kind of culture that produces sexual abuse — and especially cover-ups of sexual abuse. Douthat concludes that:
“…you can see how it could all go bad — how a culture so intensely clerical, so politically high-handed, and so embarrassed (beyond the requirements of Christian doctrine) by human sexuality could magnify the horror of priestly pedophilia, and expand the pool of victims, by producing bishops inclined to strong-arm the problem out of public sight instead of dealing with it as Christian leaders should. (In The Faithful Departed, his account of the scandal, Philip Lawler claims that while less than five percent of priests were involved in actual abuse, over two-thirds of bishops were involved in covering it up.) I suspect it isn’t a coincidence that the worst of the priest-abuse scandals have been concentrated in Ireland and America — and indeed, in Boston, the most Irish of American cities — rather than, say, in Italy or Poland or Latin America or Asia” (see Douthat’s article here).
# 5. Panic-over-sex/gender/sexuality-fluidity stories, starring: Caster Semenya!
In her post in Sexuality & Society, Shari Dworkin writes, “While Caster Semenya’s recent “news” seems to have shocked the world, the concern about “gender verification” in sport has taken place for quite some time. The tests have changed over time…but the point has not (e.g. when women are “too good,” they must not be women). …” (see also sociologist Philip Cohen’s story about Semenya, and an update on Caster’s status in the NYT). Note that in these stories there are never any calls for parallel sex verification tests to see if men they are “too much of a man,”—a man that no other “normal” man can hope to “fairly” compete with. This is because of the specific role that sport has historically played in terms of making boys into men (when women compete, there have been numerous fears that they are masculinized and are not “normal” women).
This year’s sex/gender/sexuality-panic stories also starred: Morehouse College‘s dress code, a high school girl wearing a tux, & a 4 yr. old boy kicked out of preschool for having “long” hair.
# 4. Harsher punishments for-sex-with-minors stories, starring: Roman Polanski!
Filmmaker Roman Polanski was arrested in 1977 for the sexual assault of a 13 year old girl. He spent 42 days in a California prison and was released. Upon hearing of a judge’s plan to have him serve more time and possibly deport him, Polanski fled to France. In 1988 Polanski was sued by the girl he assaulted and in 1993 settled with a payment reported at around $500,000. In the years that have passed Polanski also married (in 1989), had two children, and continued on as a prolific and well regarded film maker. For reasons that are still murky in terms of timing, Polanski was arrested on Sept. 26, 2009 (32 years after the crime) at the Zurich, Switzerland airport at the request of US authorities. Polanski’s case, spanning decades and continents, offers an insight into how laws and attitudes about sex with minors has changed in the US:
The LA Times reports that “(s)tatutory rape convictions similar to Roman Polanski’s typically result in sentences at least four times longer today than the 90-day punishment a judge favored before the director fled the United States in 1978, a Times analysis of Los Angeles County court records shows. Polanski’s arrest in Switzerland on an international fugitive warrant — and his pending extradition proceedings — have sparked transatlantic debate about whether the 76-year-old Academy Award winner should serve additional time behind bars for having sex with a 13-year-old girl….The Times analyzed sentencing data to determine how L.A. County courts today handle cases in which men admit to statutory rape — also known as unlawful sex with a minor — in exchange for the dismissal of more serious rape charges, as Polanski did. The findings show that those defendants get more time than Polanski has served — even factoring in his 70-day stint in Swiss detention — but less than his critics may expect. … “Thirty years ago, sexual assault — rape and sex crimes — were treated differently,” said Robin Sax, a former sex crimes prosecutor for the L.A. County district attorney’s office. “Time and education haven’t worked for Polanski’s benefit.”
Sociologist Barry Dank, founding editor of the Journal Sexuality & Culture, has blogged extensively about the Polanski case. Dank writes:
“There is no question that what Roman Polanski did to a 13 year old girl in the 1977 was wrong, and illegal. But it is also wrong to drag Polanski back to the US 31 years after the crime and have him spend an unspecified amount of time in prison. What possible good would come about by Polanski doing time for the crime? Obviously, it would not function to rehabilitate him or change him in some way. The fact that Polanski has had a stellar film career and apparently lived a law abiding life for 32 years after the crime is indicative that the case for changing Polanski is simply irrelevant.”
The details of Roman Polanski’s case lies in stark contrast to the case of Phillip Garrido, a registered repeat sex offender who was arrested earlier this year for kidnapping 11 yr old Jacee Dugard, and holding her captive and sexually abusing her for 18 years (from 1991-2009). The young Dugard bore two children out of Garrido’s abuse (now ages 11 and 15).
Despite today’s more stringent punishments for statutory rape, we hope that US jurors and judges will be able to distinguish the vast differences between the sexual crimes of Polanski and Garrido.
# 3. No-condoms-for-those-who-need-it-most stories, starring: Pope Benedict XVI!
While HIV/AIDS rates in sub-saharan Africa continue to soar, and condoms are very effective in fighting HIV/AIDS (when used correctly and consistently) Pope Benedict told Africans that it was wrong to use condoms.
The Pope’s message was also heard in the US, at least among some US Catholic college students. Amanda Hess, writer for the Washington City Paper highlights how all 3,000 students at Catholic University are now prohibited from having sex that is “disruptive” (defined as “ANY” sexual expression inconsistent with the Catholic Church including premarital sex and same sex sexuality). These rules are written into the code of student conduct. Hess states that:
“Deference to the catechism spares Catholic administrators from the awkward enterprise of referring to masturbation, condoms, or any other specific of a typical undergraduate’s sex life” … “violations to the student code can’t be absolved in typically Catholic fashion, with forgiveness administered privately after confession to a priest. At the Catholic University of America, your sins are subject to judicial review” (click here for full article).
Clearly, if the Catholic church cannot discuss sex outside of sex within marriage, they cannot discuss condoms very effectively.
#2. Backlash-against-sexual-&-reproductive-justice stories, starring: the murderer of Dr. George Tiller!
Gosh, this story is soooo last century (the 80s and 90s were full of anti-abortion terrorism stories), but unfortunately it’s still a story in 2009.
Dr. George Tiller, a doctor who provided late term abortions in Wichita, Kansas, was shot dead while attending Sunday Church services. Jodi Jacobson, Editor of Rh Reality Check explains the importance of Dr. Tiller’s work, as well as the cultural context for how perceptions of his work are widely inaccurate:
“In all the extensive coverage of the assassination in his church of Dr. George Tiller by a murderer affiliated with extremist right-wing groups, little has been said to shed light on what late-term abortions are, who has them and why. Instead, much of the media and talking heads pontificating on this subject have constantly focused on Tiller’s being “one of the very few doctors who perform late-term abortions,” without providing any context as to why he did so and under what circumstances. As a result, the dominant narrative is one which perpetuates an assumption that people are electing to have late-term abortions for the sake of convenience.” (To read Jacobson’s entire analysis, click here).
And finally, we’d like to end on a positive note, with a list of sexual and reproductive justice stories from 2009:
1. Sexual-&-reproductive-justice stories, starring Barack Obama!
Obama signed and/or was involved in the following sexual health and justice developments:
- Repeal of the Global Gag Rule
- Ending the HIV Travel Ban
- Affordable Birth Control Act
- Emergency contraception available to 17 year olds without a prescription
- Critical funding for sexual and reproductive health programming
- Supported starting a large prevention campaign to end HIV/AIDS in the African-American community. He formed a campaign called “Act against AIDS” and also formed an Act Against Aids Leadership Initiative AAALI) that partners with 14 of the nation’s leading African-American civic organizations in order to “integrate HIV prevention into each organization’s outreach programs.” The program refocuses national attention on the AIDS epidemic and features a media campaign called “9 1/2 minutes,” to draw attention and visibility to the fact that every 9.5 minutes, someone in the USA is infected with HIV.
And although this last bill still needs to be signed, we are expecting Obama to:
- fulfill his promise to fund evidence-based, scientifically based sex education.
As Kari Lerum noted in a recent post, “the movement toward more abstinence-only approaches is driven almost entirely by conservative religious ideology, not scientifically reliable evidence.” Because of the lack of scientific credibility for Abstinence-only sex education, we are hopeful that all funding for abstinence-only sex education will finally be eliminated from the US Federal budget.
We are intrigued by many of this year’s sexual stories, saddened by some, and encouraged by others. May 2010 be filled with opportunities to reframe old (sexist, racist, homophobic, and sex-negative) stories into sexual stories that involve measured discussion of sexual health, sexual justice, and sexual rights.
Kari Lerum & Shari L. Dworkin, Eds. Sexuality & Society.
Comments 16
Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society Admin China — December 31, 2009
[...] the rest here: Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society By admin | category: sex stories | tags: also-starred, boy-kicked, dress-code, [...]
Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society Admin China — December 31, 2009
[...] here: Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society By admin | category: sex stories | tags: also-starred, boy-kicked, dress-code, [...]
Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society » Stories, Sexuality, Society, Sexual, Read, Switzerland » Sex — January 1, 2010
[...] the original post: Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society Share and Enjoy: Diese Icons verlinken auf Bookmark Dienste bei denen Nutzer neue Inhalte finden [...]
Tweets that mention Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society -- Topsy.com — January 1, 2010
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Naadir Jeewa, Survivors In action. Survivors In action said: Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society http://bit.ly/8qAqyc [...]
Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society Male Me — January 1, 2010
[...] Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 » Sexuality and Society By admin | category: male, male stories | tags: are-grounded, duggars, male, number, [...]
uberVU - social comments — January 2, 2010
Social comments and analytics for this post...
This post was mentioned on Twitter by randomvariable: Reading: Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009: In his book, Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social.. http://bit.ly/8qAqyc...
Bethany — January 2, 2010
"Despite today’s more stringent punishments for statutory rape, we hope that US jurors and judges will be able to distinguish the vast differences between the sexual crimes of Polanski and Garrido."
The sexual crimes committed by these men are exactly the same----Garrido simply committed the crime more times and added several other crimes to his repertoire. Polanski didn't simply have sex with a minor (which, frankly, is still RAPE), he actively raped her. He penetrated her vulva and anus despite her saying no. That's rape, no matter how long ago it happened, no matter how much the victim now wishes things not be pursued. He committed a crime and then committed another crime for 30+ years by actively evading the authorities (so, no, he did not live some life of purity, or even "law-abiding" after his original crime---although if he did it would be irrelevant).
The contrast in the reporting above between the Polanski case and the look at the coverup of sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests is rather interesting.
"Ross Douthat, a conservative writer for the New York Times and the National Review, describes how a culture of fear around sexuality is precisely the kind of culture that produces sexual abuse — and especially cover-ups of sexual abuse."
Indeed. Just look at what is written here about the Polanski case.
Kari Lerum — January 2, 2010
Bethany, thank you for writing, and we appreciate your commitment to focusing on Polanski's crime. We too are certainly not trying to "cover-up" Polanski's crime; quite the opposite in fact. We are attempting to broach the delicate topic of sexual offenders and the changing culture of the criminal justice system.
Polanski raped a 13 year old girl, and no one is disputing this. He also has served time, was released by a judge and was judged guilty in a civil suit. (Unlike the priests and Garrido, he also has no evidence of any recidivism). In great contrast, we would be very surprised if any of those Irish Priests ever serve prison time (although the Irish Catholic church may go broke over lawsuits). Additionally, the priests' recurrent abuse (rape, sexual assault) has been denied and protected for decades as a result of collusion from the Catholic hierarchy. We think that this is quite remarkable and part of a culture of fear around talking about sexuality. In contrast, the protection that Polanski received from the French government was not about "covering up" his crime; it was about political jurisdiction. The Garrido case also involved a fair amount of coverup and 18 years of "non-seeing" by neighbors, customers, and parole officers. We along with many others find it outrageous that Garrido and the Catholic Church were both allowed to carry on with blatant sexual abuse for so many years with absolutely no consequence. All of them committed heinous crimes; we leave it to the judge and jury to decide on the relative severity of their sentences.
Brendon — January 3, 2010
I think you are digging too hard to make a statement on the Caster Semenya story. After all, her female competitors complained most loudly. They obviously do not want to be competing against a man at the world-quality level. You can gloss over that if you wish, but it doesn't change the fact. Compare male records and female world records in every track and field event.
Now, the questions might be more objectively asked, do testosterone levels really mean that much to performance? Were Caster's levels, which were, if I'm recalling correctly, within regulation, of such benefit? (Honestly, I didn't even know there was such a thing as acceptable testosterone levels for women, but apparently there is.) If she is "intersexual," as the test results were rumored to show, what does that mean to her competitive status? For the sake of athletic competition, how should gender be defined? Are natural physiological variations like Caster's tantamount to doping?
These are very hard questions. They are ill-served by cries of "unfair" or a glib comparative analysis - "gee, men don't have to undergo gender tests!" - when you know the rational comparison would be a woman competing as a man against men. In such a case, that woman would undergo a gender test. Found out to not be a man, she would probably be stripped of her result, though I strongly doubt any medals, as she would would be extremely unlikely to win any. Decry it all you wish, but men are objectively - in terms of how end results are measured - capable of faster times, higher or longer jumps, farther throws, etc...
Notice I did not say that men were better athletes! If athletic achievements were look in proportional terms, them I would bet competitions would be pretty equal across the board.
I think Caster was used by a manipulative national athletic association to bring some glory to her country. No different than many other countries, of course, but her circumstances thrust this onto the international stage.
Also, way to lightly brush over Polanski. Let me put it to you straight: Polanski drugged - with champagne and quaaludes, a potentially lethal combination - then had oral, vaginal and anal sex with a 13-year old girl who told him specifically and repeatedly to stop. Seriously? Are you really suggesting that the 42 days he spent in prison for psychiatric evaluation were justice? The judge was going to then formally sentence him and possibly order him to be deported; so he fled. In other words, he did NOT serve the time that was coming to him. He ran away from the impending consequence. In so fleeing, he committed another felony. Therefore, the United States had every right to pursue his capture. No statute of limitations.
The focus on him and his crime came to the fore over the past year because his own attorneys filed to have the case dismissed. The media picked it up, and there you go. Additionally, I believe those pursuing him have always said that they were waiting for the opportunity to capture and extradite him.
Incidentally, Polanski has reportedly left unpaid the civil suit settlement to the victim. Again, fleeing a consequence.
If you are "are attempting to broach the delicate topic of sexual offenders and the changing culture of the criminal justice system", then you are doing it in an odd way. The only difference between Polanski and any other child rapist who flees sentencing is celebrity, and that's all you're highlighting here - preferential celebrity treatment.
I say all this even though, by and large, I'm very skeptical of the intense demonization of sexual offenders and the increasingly draconian measures used to punish them. The lumping together of a 18-year old girl who had sex with her 15-year old boyfriend or girlfriend (or 18-year old boy with his 15-year old girlfriend or boyfriend) with serial child rapists and molesters is reprehensible and clouds the justice system with so many offenders of such varying severity as to prevent us from more clearly watching those who are most likely to re-offend. It's ridiculous and paranoid and unrealistic. I'd love it if more people - maybe this blog - exposed that pathetic scenario.
Sorry for rambling so long, but I really felt you were digging dirt that wasn't covering anything in one case and using it to cover up something that needs to be properly exposed.
Shari L. Dworkin — January 3, 2010
Hi Brendon. Thanks a million for your comments! I dont think we are digging too hard at all on the Caster story--Im actually going to be digging MUCH more deeply both historically and in contemporary terms in 3 new articles soon (and I think I will follow up with a book too). But for now: if you take a quick read of Susan Cahn's book "Coming on Strong: Gender and Sexuality in 20th Century Women's Sport," there's quite a bit of historical information on women in sport to challenge your points of views which are, quite frankly, all of the classic (and challenge-able) arguments about dichotomous difference in sport. The IAAF itself banned gender verification testing in sport and has abandoned a variety of tests over the course of history.
And the case is not closed AT ALL on what constitutes a man and what constitutes a woman in sport. And no, the logical comparison would not be to compare a woman competing as a man against men. The logical comparison would be to test ANYONE who offers a genetic, hormonal, or other "unfair" advantage whereby a continuum exists.
Why dont we foot test those who have large feet in swimming for offering them an unfair genetic advantage over others? Why dont we hand and height test those in basketball who have an unfair genetic advantage over others?
If sport was really about athletic performance--and not dichotomous sex difference--we would organize it differently, perhaps.
Im not commenting on the Polanski news as Im not as intimately familiar with it. I like your brutal honest and courage about both stories and rest assured: you never need to apologize for "rambling"--we enjoy and welcome your comments very much. Please keep em coming.
Brendon — January 3, 2010
Shari,
Then what's to be done regarding gender and sport? I fully recognize that gender is not an easy dichotomy - I don't believe I claimed it was such - but that's the way sports are presently organized.
It looks to me that you are researching some of the very questions that I asked in my first comment; so I look forward to reading the results of that research.
I think my main objection was that the post made it sound like some nefarious conspiracy by athletics to suppress women, when it seems to me to be confusion about what to do regarding sexual fluidity. The problem in this specific instance being born out of uncertainty, not malice.
Shari L. Dworkin — January 3, 2010
Brendon thank you again for writing!
Quick comments! Cool, will keep you in the loop on the upcoming research.
I dont think an honest and open analysis of the history of social inequality in sport (whether by race, class, gender, or sexuality, all of which have a long history) is a "nefarious conspiracy by athletics to suppress women." For God's sake, Brendon, women were declared "physiologically incapable" of running the marathon and werent even allowed to do it in the Olympics until 1984! They are banned right now in downhill skiing in the Olympics for the same reason and because of fears that their "reproductive organs" will be harmed.
And did you know that a woman even struck out both Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig in an exhibition baseball game in 1931 (Jackie Mitchell) and women have been banned from baseball ever since (note they use that large thing that people laugh at called a softball instead). Nefarious conspiracy? Where is the language of social justice and social inequality concerning women in sport? Its quite fitting.
So there have been 2 historical arguments given about womens participation in sport and both are alive and well TODAY RIGHT NOW. One is women are too frail and cant do it. Ive given you those examples above.
The other argument has been that they will become masculinized--be like men. The sex testing comes into play there...and it has a long history! It used to be a panty check! And its morphed and morphed and science continues to fight about what makes a woman in sport. The counterargument to some of these arguments is this--sport was an institution developed by and for men at the turn of the century to make boys into men (see Varda Burstyn's book or Mike Messner's work or Don Sabo's work or Susan Cahn's work or Helen Lenskyj, or Mary Jo Kane)--why wouldnt we expect it to masculinize women?
So back to your question--whats to be done about gender and sport? WHAT A GREAT QUESTION! Honestly, I will leave this to other authors who have done a nice job on that--to see a wonderful argument about how the two sex system in sport leads to transphobia, homophobia, and gender injustice, check out Ann Travers' article 'The sport nexus and gender injustice'--she has many suggestions both legally and culturally for 'what to do'!
But I would also DEFINITELY CHECK OUT MARY JO KANE's super interesting article in the JOURNAL OF SPORT AND SOCIAL ISSUES called "Resistance/transformation of the oppositional binary: Exposing sport as a continuum"--if you dont have it, send me your email address and I will send it privately to you! It helps round out the arguments we're discussing a lot.
Best regards to you!
Brendon — January 3, 2010
Shari,
I know and fully accept that there has been and continues to be ridiculous and capricious fiats, rules and roles imposed on women by the sporting powers that be. I'm a runner, former baseball, softball and basketball player. I've seen and even participated in my fair share of gender-based shaming regarding sport. It was my conditioning to be too competitive and aggressive. I've rejected that since then, but how does one really completely turn back the past from creeping into our subconscious thoughts or quotidian behaviors?
I'm not in any way suggesting that oppressing women in sports doesn't exist. It only seems that in the Semenya case, the authorities were stymied more by uncertainty than by any organized conspiracy to hurt women in sports overall. They stumbled over themselves trying to figure out what to do, and they didn't have any good response, because it is a very tricky question. It's a tricky question primarily in the ways you have outlined in these responses to my comments.
I knew about the female pitcher, by the way, and it's no small feat to strikeout Ruth and Gehrig, but to do so is not equivalent to being competitive day in and day out against them. Even crappy professional pitchers strike out Joe Mauer from time to time in today's Major Leagues. Pitchers come out of farm systems, strike out a few and stink it up until they get sent back down. Hitting a baseball is an exquisitely difficult skill, even the best strike out many times each season. I'm not saying it's impossible for women to compete at that level. I am skeptical, but I'd still love to see the Major Leagues open to women.
On the subject on women in baseball, one of my favorite baseball stories regards my sister who played on our Little League team back in the 1970s. We lived in a tiny, tiny town, there were four kids in my family. The Little League teams in such towns were composed of kids in grades 5-8 - so they could get enough to field a team - and one year, my older brother (8th grade), older sister (7th grade) and myself (5th grade) all fit in that age range. My story is very simple, one game my sister hit a home run AND pitched a no hitter. I watched from right field, with basically nothing to do as she struck out batter after batter over 7 innings (a full Little League game at the time). She was a great baseball player.
My email address better (at) carleton (dot) edu I'd love to read that article.
Eros Coaching » The 2009 Rundown — March 29, 2010
[...] • Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009 [...]
Catholic Priests, Sexual Abuse, and learning how to talk about sex in church » Sexuality and Society — March 29, 2010
[...] “Top Ten Sexual Stories of 2009″ (Sexuality & Society. See #6, Catholic priest cover up stories) [...]
Baxter — January 2, 2011
Isn't "Octomom"'s first name Nadya, not Angela? (unless she got a name change?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadya_Suleman