Ask me five years ago and I’d have told you I’d be first in line to challenge gender stereotypes if ever I had kids myself. I minored in feminist cultural studies! I believe boys and girls are made, not just born! But sixteen months into parenting my boy/girl twins, I’m starting to wonder how I’ll ever ensure that my boy grows up sensitive and my girl stays, as one of my favorite organizations has trained me to say, strong, brave, and bold.
It’s an unfortunate moment for complacency. Children are boxed into hyper-gendered categories at ages younger than ever before. Just last month, Disney infiltrated the delivery room. New research shows that girls as young as three are internalizing the thin ideal. As blogger Pigtail Pals reports, a study by Dr. Jennifer Harriger, published in 2010 finds that preschoolers are attributing stereotypes to others because of their weight. The news is distressing. Gender-aware parents can cleanse our daughters’ bedrooms of pale pink and defend a love for Tinkerbelle in our sons, yet the clutch of our pink-vs.-blue culture seems only to tighten its hold. Why, we’re all asking, is this so?
There’s ample proof that since the utopian hope of “Free to Be You and Me” in the 1970s, as a culture we’ve slid backwards. As Peggy Orenstein documents so thoroughly and well in Cinderella Ate My Daughter: Dispatches from the Frontlines of the New Girlie Girl Culture (reviewed here this week by Elline!), things are far worse than they were when we grew up. The hyper-marketing of gendered purchases target kids at an increasingly vulnerable age, and it’s enough to make any parent tired.
We can blame Disney and we can fight the princesses, but perhaps two additional reasons that a generation of parents raised on feminism feels like we’re losing the war is that 1) we’re confused and 2) we’re alone.
We’re confused by “science.” Fighting gender-based discrimination has morphed into dealing with science, which carries boldfaced authority—and many feminist scientists themselves are now fighting this fight too. Sometimes I wonder about the effects. Have Gen X parents grown convinced of children’s innate gender sensibilities? Decades of media stories hawking the latest in neuroscience have emphasized the nature side of the nurture debate that second-wave feminism famously upstaged. Have the things we’ve heard about gender affected a new generation’s parenting behavior? “The more we parents hear about hard-wiring and biological programming, the less we bother tempering our pink or blue fantasies, and start attributing every skill or deficit to innate sex differences,” suggests neuroscientist Lise Eliot in her book Pink Brain, Blue Brain, (which argues, by the way, that social expectations—not biological differences—have the upper hand in shaping who our children become.) Sensational, whiplash-inducing headlines tell us gender is inborn—no, wait, made—no, born. Unless you’re steeped in this research, it’s often hard to know what’s what anymore.
But our biggest problem, I fear, is that when it comes to resisting the hyper-genderfication of childhood, we’re largely fighting it alone.
Over the past sixteen months, as my babies have progressed from a crawl to a walk and now to words, it’s slowly dawned on me how much the premise of my previous book, Sisterhood, Interrupted: From Radical Women to Grrls Gone Wild, applies to my new situation: As parents, and especially as new parents, we don’t always feel plugged into a movement to change the larger culture in which we raise our kids. Instead, we’re left to focus on ourselves—in this case, our familial microcosms—on our own.
To be sure, there’s a burgeoning movement out there. I’m a huge fan of initiatives like SPARK and the Geena Davis Institute and efforts to redefine girly like Pigtail Pals and of course the longstanding work of Girls Inc. I voraciously consume every new book by educators like Lyn Mikel Brown to learn what we can do to resist (See Packaging Girlhood, Packaging Boyhood, and also the resource page at the wonderful Peggy Orenstein’s site.) But these initiatives aren’t as mainstreamed as they might be. I can control my growing babies’ media consumption and control what comes in the house, but control only goes so far. I fear that as a new mother, I’m long on feminist parenting ideals, short on ways to make them stick in the world outside my home.
I hear that change feels more possible once your kids hit kindergarten. My friends there tell me that they feel successful in their attempts to provide a larger context in which it’s natural for their girl to love Star Wars and their boy to take ballet. They feel effective. They feel their actions span far.
In the meantime, we mothers of babes continue our preparations for the good fight by lining our children’s bookshelves with The Sissy Duckling and No I Will NOT Wear a Dress and painting our nurseries sage. But short of a massive and visible movement—you know, like the political ones we see right now on tv—sometimes I worry. Are we all just focusing on the equivalent of wardrobes and walls?
What do YOU think? Do you see a new generation of parents taking on the battle against the hyper-genderfication of childhood in spades? Is there a movement? Or are we all basically out here on our own? If you have strong thoughts on this either way, for a writing/blogging/thinking project I’m working on (The Pink and Blue Diaries), I’d love to hear from you. Please email me at deborah@shewrites.com
Comments
Heather Hewett — March 7, 2011
Great post, Deborah! I have a girl who loves "boy" things but have found it much, much harder to make it "ok" for my little boy to do "girl" things.... ballet would be dreamy, but it takes a class with lots of boys for that to happen... and I haven't found that in the 'burbs, only in places like NYC. A simple dance class with a handful of boys and no pink tutus was hard enough to locate! I think we need a movement around this, and questioning the "facts" that science gives us about "innate" boy and girl qualities is one of the first steps to engage a lot of like-minded parents.
OFF THE SHELF: Rescuing Your Daughter From the Princess | Girl with Pen — March 7, 2011
[...] w/Pen friends — it’s been too long! In keeping with today’s theme so wonderfully explored by Debbie Siegel, here’s my review of my shero Peggy Orenstein’s latest. This review originally [...]
Judith — March 8, 2011
Great post, and resonates with what I've been struggling with lately. Yesterday my 4 year old son refused a gift of some doll accessories because they were pink. I could tell he was tempted to take them, as he watched his twin sister play with the same set, but he ultimately asked if there was something else that wasn't "for girls." (He also gave the excuse that his doll is now a "big boy" and doesn't need "all that baby stuff.") I felt so sad for him. I tried to remind him that pink isn't just for girls and that we know lots of boys and men who like pink -- and his sister chimed in with examples, too, which was sweet -- but he remained skeptical. I hate that he's already internalized the message that pink is for girls, and I also hate that doll accessories seem only to come in pink, so that along with rejecting pink, he also ends up rejecting doll-play. It was one of those experiences that made me feel that whatever we try to do inside our home/family to teach that gender is not rigid, the messages of the rest of the world are too powerful to overcome. You're right, we need a bigger movement.
Are We Too Isolated To Fight the Pink-v.-Blue Battle? : Ms Magazine Blog — March 9, 2011
[...] with permission from Girl w/ Pen. Print | Email | [...]
Lori — March 9, 2011
I agree that it's really tough to buck mainstream gender trends with children, to offer alternatives beyond the pink-and-blue bifurcations that color everything from "wardrobes to walls." And for parents of toddlers: just wait till your kids are old enough to develop--and articulate--opinions of their own! And yet, those very opinions are shaped and molded by all the cultural influences swirling about---all the media productions, toys, and clothing items that Peggy Orenstein chronicles in her new book (on the girls' side of the spectrum) as well as the equally pervasive codes and symbols of boyish masculinity: sports images, skateboards, action heroes, etc.) In this respect, the "Free to Be" moment of the early to mid 1970s--when many of us GirlWPen bloggers and readers were tykes ourselves--really WAS different: there was more support "out there" in what became part of the taken-for-granted popular culture: unisex clothing styles and hair cuts, primary colors, gender-less toys, songs and books that challenged the dominant gender scripts. Resisting the cultural tide has never been easy for feminist parents--in fact, the non-sexist childrearing movement of the 1970s resulted from careful, determined work by many activist women (and some men). As our kids make their way through childhood, they will make their own trajectory through today's gendered landscape, and as parents, we need to support our kids' emerging identities (however they may develop) while offering them alternative choices and encouraging them to question what counts as normal.
GWP @ NWSA! | Girl with Pen — November 13, 2011
[...] CHECK OUT PANELISTS’ COLUMNS AND SAMPLE POSTS SCIENCE GRRL / Veronica Arreola Can We Whistle Stereotypes Away? BODY POLITIC / Kyla Bender-Baird Love Your (NonNormative) Body – a dialogue with Kyla and Avory GLOBAL MAMA / Heather Hewett Maternal Health, One Year Later GIRL TALK / Allison Kimmich The Other Sex Talk BODY LANGUAGE / Alison Piepmeier High Expectations MAMA W/PEN / Deborah Siegel Midlife Mama Asks Whether We’re All Too Isolated to Fight the Pink-v.-Blue Battle Outside Our Home... [...]