/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
With the 6th and final season upon us, will Lost finally zoom towards a feminist future? With the number of female characters dwindling and the simultaneous deification of hetero white males, can feminist Lost fans hope for a satisfying island conclusion?
Previous seasons have been a mixed bag on this count.
Lost has many strong female characters, many of whom I could easily see wearing a “This is what a feminist look like” t-shirt. As noted by Melissa McEwan of Shakesville, an admitted Lost junkie, “Generally, the female characters are more well-rounded than just about any other female characters on television, especially in ensemble casts.”
Lost has often presented ‘gender outside the box’ characters, suggesting being human is more important than being a masculine man or a feminine woman. After all, when you are fighting for your life, ‘doing gender right’ is hardly at the top of you priority list.
While Jack and Sawyer try to out-macho each other in their love triangle with Kate, neither hold entirely to the Rambo-man-in-jungle motif. As for the women, they just might be the strongest, bravest, wisest female characters to grace a major network screen since Cagney and Lacey.
Though the island is certainly patriarchal, one could make a strong case that male-rule is not such a good thing for (island) society. Kate or Juliet would be far better leaders than any of the island patriarchs (and as some episodes suggest, would make great co-leaders – what a feminist concept!)
McEwan, in her discussion with fellow Lost fanatic, Brad Reed of Sadly, No!, agrees, stating “the show looks increasingly to be making an oblique but advanced commentary about the patriarchy.” As she argues:
“The Lost fathers (Benry, Widmore, Paik, Shephard the Elder) are archetypical patriarchs-rich, powerful, well-educated, well-connected, straight, and white, with the exception of Mr. Paik, who’s in the ethnic majority of his country of residence. It is within the battle among these patriarchs that everyone else is caught; it is to their whims, and their arbitrary rules and preferences, that everyone else is subjected. That’s clearly framed as Not a Good Thing, which rather suggests a feminist critique of the patriarchy.”
However, as the two hour season premiere revealed, one of the strongest female leads, Juliet, is dead. Kate is still rocking the strong-woman action, yet the fact remains that “We’re just about out of female characters to root for” (as Cara of Feministe points out).
This slow decrease in female characters means that a show that had more males to begin with has become decidedly testosterone weighted. Moreover, the (white) males left are being deified with Jabob/Lock/Richard/Ben all seemingly having godlike powers. This turn is all the more frustrating given that supposedly Kate was initially conceived as the island leader. Alas, as reported by Jill at Feministe, “execs thought that people wouldn’t watch the show if a chick was in charge, so they gave that role to Jack and turned Kate into one corner of a love triangle.” Grrrr.
The 30-minute season recap that aired last week kept implying women viewers are wooed by the romantic motifs that dominate many of the narrative arcs. Apparently ABC is unaware that women are interested in more things than romance (and shirtless hotties).
Sometimes the writers seem oblivious to the fact that women are more than man-seeking baby-making machines, too. Season five was particularly dire in this vein. Drawing on the Freudian ‘baby as penis replacement’ motif, Kate was depicted as trying to repair the loss of Sawyer with baby Aaron. (For more on this line of argument, go here.)
Yet, overall, Kate is arguably one of the smartest, most daring female characters to lead a contemporary mega-hit television series. Her back-story ain’t bad either – she was on that doomed flight as a result of fighting back against her mother’s abusive partner. And, though Juliet sometimes seems more focused on her various Romeos than on other matters, she heroically detonated the bomb that launched us into season six. Who knows, maybe this final season will launch us into some sort of feminist utopia led by Eloise Hawking or Rousseau. At the very least, let’s hope it doesn’t culminate with Kate all happily married and duly domesticated!
Comments 4
vertigo — February 5, 2010
I used to think that Kate was a feminist-like character at the beginning of the show but no more. I fail to see how her character has developed past the 'i have feelings for both Sawyer and Jack' phase. Its a pitty because I really liked her character and thought it was promosing at the start of the show. Makes me miss Ana Lucia.
xham — February 6, 2010
There are a few other strong females.
Llana is shaping to be a key player/leader in this season. She outsmarted Sayid, has intimate ties to Jacob, Dharma and seems to know many of the islands secrets. In many ways she is a dangerous version of Kate but it will interesting to know what destroyed her face that Jacob helped fix.
Sun has shown many strengths of character like intelligence, independence and fearlessness. Only her backwards cultural heritage has stopped her from being a stronger player I think.
Previously we have have Ana Lucia and Danielle. and Penny
Overall though your points about the testosterone heavy direction the show is going are very valid. In addition the strong female roles have been balanced by weak ones like Claire and Shannon..dumb blond stereotypes!
Laura — February 7, 2010
I think that both Claire and Shannon showed that they were well-rounded women in the end and not just "dumb blond stereotypes." We saw Shannon grow a lot in her relationship with Sayid though she definitely started out as the spoiled girl of the island. It sucks though that we only saw he grow through a connection with one of the strong men of the island. And Claire definitely showed that she could step up and be a mother to Aaron after she gave birth even though she didn't think she could. Sure she abandoned him, but we still don't really know why that really happened.
Overall, I have been disappointed with the show in that they have a tendency to kill off strong, interesting women in favor of showing how that death effects the men on the island. But I am glad that Lost has introduced all of these strong, interesting women, because they definitely didn't have to.
Natalie Wilson — February 8, 2010
Thanks for your comments.
Vertigo,
I miss Ana Lucia too! But, I do have a soft spot for Kate. I know it sometimes seems she can't see beyond Sawyer's abs or Jack's smoldering stare, but I try to focus on her guts and continued refusal to be left behind. She always insists on going on the various saving/exploring missions even when Jack is like "oh no Kate, it's not safe for a girlz." I think Kate is a feminist at heart -- if only all the male scriptwriters would let the true Kate shine! :)
Xham,
Yes, I agree, there are other strong female characters.
As for Sun's "backwards cultural heritage," are you suggesting that the show suggests her heritage is "backwards" as an explanation for her marriage/submission to Jin?
I do think the "western lens" is all too apparent at times, especially in regards to race -- Jin as the domineering husband, Sayid as torturer, etc.
I don't find Claire fits into the "dumb blonde" stereotype - she was very articulate. If anything, I see more of a virgin birth motif going on -- especially with all pregnant women dying on the island. If she is indeed supposed to represent some sort of miraculous motherhood, I would prefer she were not white - haven't we had enough deification of whiteness?
Laura,
I agree with you that Shannon grew as a character but that it's too bad she had to do so via her attachment to an alpha male.
I have never read Claire's disappearance as abandonment. I think we will find out more about that this season.
I too have been disappointed that they tend to kill off the strong women, not to mention various characters of color!