I live in Los Angeles where saying that you don’t like movies is tantamount to claiming atheism in a church. But I don’t like movies, generally speaking. In contrast, I quite like TV. Does this seem weird?
The Geena Davis Institute on Gender and Media offers a clue as to why I might lean towards television. The Institute did a content analysis of 11,927 speaking characters in “family films” (G, PG, and PG-13) and prime-time and children’s TV shows (see it here). They looked at the presence of female and male characters and the jobs those characters were doing. In almost every instance, women had greater visibility, and better jobs, on prime-time TV than they did in either movies or children’s shows.
Presence
Women are, for example, 39% of characters on prime time, but only 31% of characters on kids’ shows and only 28% in movies. Casts are twice as likely to be gender-balanced on prime time (45-55% female), compared to movies. Half of the casts of family films are 75% or more male, compared to only 20% of the casts on TV shows and 39% of children’s shows.
Occupations
Almost half of all American workers are female, but they hold only 20% of the jobs on the big screen and 25% of the jobs on children’s shows. Again, here prime-time does somewhat better: 34% of the jobs on evening TV are held by women.
The next two tables reveal how men and women are distributed among different kinds of occupations in films and on prime time. Men are over-represented in almost all cases, but the disproportion in movies is almost always significantly worse than it is on TV.
If you’re one of the people that contributed to Star Trek Into Darkness‘ $70.6 million opening weekend this week, this data might not be surprising. I didn’t count, but I suspect it falls into the 50% of films that has a cast that is at least 75% male. It certainly didn’t pass the Bechdel Test; the two female speaking characters, if I remember correctly, never spoke to one another at all, and so they couldn’t have spoken to each other about something other than a man (that’s the test). (Oh wait, I think one of the twins with tails in bed with Kirk said “hey” when he leapt out to go do something important, so that’s three women with speaking roles).
So, like in lots and lots of films, women in Star Trek were woefully under-represented except as love interests for the two protagonists (Uhura in this movie and Carol, it was foreshadowed, in the next). I’m used to it, so it doesn’t really stir me up, but that doesn’t mean I have to like movies. I’ll stick to TV, thank you very much. It’s not perfect, but it’s a hell of a lot better than Hollywood.
Cross-posted at BlogHer, Pacific Standard, and The Huffington Post.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 53
John Everyman — May 21, 2013
I am going to fix this
Kali — May 21, 2013
I prefer TV to movies too, for this very same reason. TV is far from being a feminist utopia but it is not half as bad as movies.
Anna — May 21, 2013
It doesn't seem weird to prefer tv shows over movies for the reasons you state, but it must be interpreted for what it is: a personal preference, not something to generalize. I'm quite the opposite, in that I am obsessed with movies, and am not really into tv shows. There are a handful of shows I do enjoy, but even then, I don't feel compelled to watch every season, every episode. And again, that's just a personal preference.
I don't really care if female characters feature prominently in a given movie, the thought has never even crossed my mind. In fact, my personal inclination is to consider it a complete shame if people only seek out stories that mirror back to them in literal ways. If you can't look characters' basic signifiers (ex. age, gender, job) and relate to them on a deeper, more meaningful level, then that's what would seem weird to me.
I don't watch the movie C.R.A.Z.Y and think, "I'm not moved by this because I wasn't a closeted gay boy growing up with four rowdy brothers in 1970's suburban Montreal and hey, why are all the females relegated to supporting roles??" It is one of my all-time favorite films. I cried all through the movie Oslo, August 31st - should I have been left cold by the movie because the saintly (to me) depiction of Norwegian culture and generous opportunities for rehabilitation and redemption given to the (male) protagonist would never ever be attainable in my own home country?
As for the LA thing, I've been in LA for about a month now, and I've never been more spoiled for choice of movies. It is completely overwhelming. Hollywood productions are just a tiny fraction of what is being screened. And that's not even putting Netflix (which I'm fortunate enough to have access to) into the equation - you Americans are so lucky! There is a world of film out there beyond Hollywood. And I don't just mean foreign productions - the US produces an incredible wealth of cinema, and in my experience, nowhere is it more accessible than in Los Angeles..
myblackfriendsays — May 21, 2013
The Geena Davis Institute on Gender and Media?
Fawn Livingston-Gray — May 21, 2013
I'd love to hear what TV shows you like that represent strong and interesting women characters. Not all my media entertainment need do that, but I am always looking for it!
Andrew — May 22, 2013
I’ll stick to TV, thank you very much. It’s not perfect, but it’s a hell of a lot better than Hollywood.
1. TV also comes from "Hollywood."
2. Family films (G to PG-13) are not representative of all Hollywood films, let alone all films in general. What they do represent is the portion of films produced for the broadest global audience, the ones that often have no chance of recovering their massive budgets from domestic trade alone. For that reason, they're also the most compromised in terms of character development and cultural specificity, and female characters take the biggest hit there. A $100m-budgeted PG-13 flick is intended to sell well in countries with very different concepts of women's role in society - some more advanced than the US, others much less so. And sadly, the studios seldom take any chances with tentpole flicks that actually push the boundaries of anything other than logic.
But is there any reason to omit R-Rated and Unrated films from the research here? Among them you have most of the films in limited release, made for a more adult audience (I'm pretty sure Lisa is allowed to watch them without a guardian), with grown female characters that are not just either Love Interest or Mom. You have far more independent and non-American films, and far more works by female directors and writers. Moreover, you have a lot of stuff that wouldn't be shown on prime time TV.
3. On the other hand, there is some fantastic, broadly cinematic television going on right now. The long form of a TV series allows for the kind of deep, slow-burning character development that the time constraints of a feature film really limit, which leaves room for more a larger number of complex characters in each cast. Including women, but I'd also argue that the best TV shows also have more interesting male characters than the average mainstream movie.
4. Even so, saying "I don't like movies" and supporting that statement of personal preference with some banal data about a tiny portion of the world's movies is a bit like saying "I don't like books" and showing us a chart about Dan Brown and Nicholas Sparks.
Lisa, you can do better.
TV VS THE MOVIES: WHICH DOES BETTER BY WOMEN? | Welcome to the Doctor's Office — May 22, 2013
[...] from SocImages [...]
ViktorNN — May 22, 2013
I don't have time to dig into the study, but I'm wondering if it addresses all the non-fictional shows available on cable that cater specifically to women? While I wouldn't say it's very high quality, the spectrum that includes reality shows, home and lifestyle shows, and so on seems pretty vast, diverse, and more or less on par with, if not exceeding, the amount of "male" oriented shows, most of which seems to be war documentaries and sports.
But hey, I stopped watching TV years ago...
TV OR MOVIES??? | Indianfeminist101 — May 23, 2013
[...] TV OR MOVIES??? [...]
Lisa Wade: TV vs. the Movies: Which Does Better by Women? - Freshwadda Brooks | Coming Soon! — May 31, 2013
[...] Originally posted at Sociological Images. [...]
Because women are interchangeable to Tom Cruise | This flooded sky — May 23, 2014
[…] read a post a few days ago on whether TV or movies do better by women at Sociological Images. Even left a comment, but realized the futility of following the thread further since […]
Because women are interchangeable - The Lady Errant — November 1, 2014
[…] read a post a few days ago on whether TV or movies do better by women at Sociological Images. Even left a comment, but realized the futility of following the thread further since […]
Cyberflix for windows — October 6, 2019
I've been in LA for about a month now, and I've never been more spoiled for choice of movies. It is completely overwhelming. Hollywood productions are just a tiny fraction of what is being screened. And that's not even putting Netflix (which I'm fortunate enough to have access to) into the equation
fuckoff — October 6, 2019
It is completely overwhelming. Hollywood productions are just a tiny fraction of what is being screened. And that's not even putting Netflix
https://cyberflix.biz
lalacovar — February 25, 2020
Mobdro is an application that helps you solve this. Mobdro allows users to watch movies and TV for free. So, be independent of each person's interests.
Mobdro — April 6, 2020
I also like TV more because it's new and constantly updated. You can use Mobdro on your TV.
Owen Wesley — November 11, 2021
Thank you for sharing. Try out Rokkr, the movie, episode and more entertainment streaming app.
Mika — May 6, 2023
Mobdro Plus is a streaming application for Android devices that allows users to watch movies, series, TV shows, sports events and music videos. The application has various categories of content and a convenient search to find the right movie or show.
Mobdro Plus also offers a wide range of adult games, covering a variety of genres and styles of play. Users can easily download and install games on their devices and enjoy the game anytime.
The application also has the ability to add movies and TV shows to the "Favorites" list for easy and quick access to them. Using the "Share" function, users can also easily share interesting content with friends.
Mobdro Plus provides video quality settings so that users can customize it to suit their needs and network conditions. A playback control function is also available for easy and convenient content navigation.
Mobdro Plus is a convenient and easy-to-use application for streaming various content and games on Android devices.
Lwre Getf — May 9, 2024
It's not weird at all. TV has evolved to offer more diverse and complex narratives, providing better opportunities for women both in front of and behind the camera. If you're interested in exploring this further, you might enjoy checking out Download Yacine TV Live to discover a range of shows that highlight strong female characters and perspectives.