Re-posted to add to the discussion about sexual assault in the aftermath of the Steubenville rape trial, the Senate hearing on rape and harassment in the military, and the controversy at Occidental College.
Women’s vulnerability to men’s violence and harassment is a common topic of public service announcements (PSAs) in industrialized countries. More often than not, however, awareness campaigns are aimed at women and tell them how to avoid victimization. We’ve posted already, for example, on campaigns telling girls and women that they are responsible for stopping internet predators, preventing sexual harassment, and instigating domestic violence.
Critics argue that stopping predation, harassment, and violence by men requires telling men not to do those things and telling women to restrict their activities to avoid men who might victimize them is only doubly oppressive. So, when Jeff H. sent in a nice example of a U.K. anti-rape ad targeting men, we thought it was worthy of a post (and see this anti-domestic violence ad for another example).
In a less complimentary mood, Copyranter noted that the poster was hanging in bathrooms and published in men’s magazines and wondered if anti-rape messages should really be communicated with a women’s nearly-naked navel, crotch, and thighs.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 84
Flor — July 10, 2010
I had to read that four times before I got that the message didn't read "Have sex with someone who hasn't, said yes to it, and the next place you enter could be prison."
Anonymous — July 10, 2010
So messed up that this is like, shocking & good news.
nesbitt — July 10, 2010
I'm uncomfortable with a woman being described as a "place you enter." Isn't that the implication? You "enter" an unwilling woman, and then you'll be entering a prison?
Alyssa — July 10, 2010
I really have to agree with what Cara of the Curvature said in this post:
http://thecurvature.com/2010/06/03/how-not-to-critique-anti-rape-campagins/
You should go read it because she says it way better than I can. However, to summarize, the problem with this ad is not the woman's body--a woman's body is just a body and there is nothing inherently sexual about it. However, the idea that men simply cannot control themselves around sexy images and rape because of their overwhelming sexual desire is a dangerous one. It's the "crime of passion" way of thinking, instead of the "desire for power combined with not viewing women as real human beings" way of thinking. Moreover, the "entry" pun is fucked up in this context. An anti-rape PSA is not an appropriate place for cutesy jokes. Additionally, there are many ways to rape someone and not all of them require "entry."
Lindsay — July 10, 2010
I think it's a good idea to have a nearly-naked woman in the ad, because it says "I'm not wearing much, but that doesn't mean I'm asking for it"
Andie — July 10, 2010
I agree with Lindsay on her point about no wearing much.. but I feel that because the focus is on the body, and the ad copy, still tends to dehumanize women, which is part of the problem with sexual assault - in many cases the rapist doesn't see the victim as human but rather as an object for their sexual or power-driven desires.
I applaud the idea of making men take responsibility for sexual assault.. however, I think it may be more effective to remind remind them of our humanity, not take it away.
Andie — July 10, 2010
I'm sorry, I meant to say 'the focus on the body and the ad copy still tend to dehumanize women'. Me fail english - unpossible.
ptp — July 10, 2010
I think the faceless unidentified underwear-clad woman is the ideal setting for this. It's aimed at people who think that it's okay to force yourself on a woman. It's aimed at people who objectify them already. It's getting precisely into that place in their heads that women occupy and saying "hey guess what? prison."
Sometimes I wish we could consider ways in which sexualizing ads can be useful or harmless; it seems like as soon as we identify that a thing is sexualized we just assume that that's a bad idea and there's no two ways about it. In most cases I'm inclined to agree - especially where younger girls are involved or targetted - but sexualization is an integral part of adult socialization, and treating it with such uniform derision seems narrow-minded. I think this ad is an example of where it's done to good effect. And come on, it's been 20+ years since an effectively un-posed woman in white panties standing up straight has been anything close to edgy.
Mike — July 10, 2010
http://www.currybet.net/images/blog2006/20060809_homeoffice2.gif
Here is another ad from the campaign.
H — July 10, 2010
the consequence as stated here is you could go to prison, like any other crime- its not like we say dont murder you could end up in jail! murder is just wrong and thats accepted. i wish the idea that its a total violation of someone and ideally i suppose that concept in itself would be enough for someone not to want to rape someone.
the more i look at it the more i think its intended for a date rape type audience, not the kind of horrible rape i had in mind. but i still dont like thinking that its someone wanting to have sex with someone and them not saying yes leads to someone wanting to stop because now said person would have grounds to have you arrested- versus not wanting to do that to someone and their sense of self.
Cyffermoon — July 10, 2010
Ick. It's just a gut reaction, but to me the imagery feeds into the oblivious and/or misogynistic person's idea of what the prelude to rape typically constitutes: some nearly-naked chick acting like a tease.
A — July 10, 2010
I was excited to see this post after seeing the headline, but I am disappointed in the poster. Don't rape, because you might go to prison. What about the fact that it's wrong and horrible and disgusting and violent? Ugh, this is making me sick. I have other problems with it, but that is the main one.
Kelly — July 10, 2010
I fully support PSAs that actually address perpetrators instead of the typical, "Ladies, police your every move and don't wear a ponytail Mr. Mean Rapist could grab!" condescending victim-blaming stuff.
But I dunno. I see this and think, Well you COULD go to jail, yet the reality is rape is pretty easy to get away with in this country (as I believe Cyffermoon alludes to). Rape convictions are so low - less than 7% in the UK and that's conviction for REPORTED rapes (think of those that don't go reported). IOW the idea that all rapists go to prison is kind of a little fable that is so far from true. I wonder if people see this ad and think, "Well I don't know any men who went to prison for rape, so rape is pretty dern rare!" and therefore continue propagating the myth that rape is only when that Pretty White Lady walks down an alley and is accosted by an Evil, Violent stranger.
It is exactly that kind of erasure of how much rape happens and that it happens between friends, acquaintances, family, and that date rape is absolutely real and horrifying. H inadvertently exposed those attitudes by tossing off "date rape" vs. "horrible rape".
benjamin adam — July 10, 2010
let's not forget about race as well. as many black feminists have pointed out, anti-rape campaigns have often centered around protecting the chastity of white women through threat of punishment. it's certainly not an accident that the woman here appears white, and that (at least in the united states) those much, much more likely to be incarcerated for rape are black men accused of raping white women.
Asa — July 10, 2010
I think this ad is questionable in its efficacy and intent because it's not saying, "Don't rape because it's morally wrong", it's saying, "Don't rape otherwise you'll get caught". It's not trying to prevent the causes of rape - objectification and de-empathisation of rapists to their victims - which are the morally wrong aspects of it, but instead perpetrates that by having the "sexy" objectified woman with her face cut off in the picture.
It falls into the same trap all punishment-prevention does, and thus skyrocketing gaol budgets around the world failing to prevent various increases in crime. These kinds of ads just cause rapists to use methods to protect themselves more in their crimes, rather than prevent said crimes happening.
I long for the day someone makes a poster of a non-sexualised woman with a face with the truist slogan over it saying, "This woman is a human being. Don't rape her. Don't rape anybody." It's sad that such a truism would end up being more effective than this sad excuse for crime prevention.
AO — July 10, 2010
That is like UN saying to united states: "Do not attack to third world countries you do not like".
Korean Gender Reader « The Grand Narrative — July 10, 2010
[...] see Sociological Images for an innovative but controversial anti-rape campaign in the U.K. (example above) that focuses on [...]
Simone Lovelace — July 10, 2010
So, the pun is stupid, and the image is uninspired. That being said, I find that fact that they define a non-consenting woman as "a woman who hasn't said yes," as opposed to "a woman who has said no" to be incredibly encouraging.
I am so glad to see the "enthusiastic consent" paradigm used in a major way.
adamson — July 10, 2010
An anti-rape ad directed to men! Color me surprised!
However, I dislike the focus on the woman's nudity.
Daniel — July 11, 2010
Hey guys,
I was wondering what you guys thought about a call FOR rape to be committed? Is this justified in any circumstance? what type of person (woman in this case) would accept such a thing? Can intelligent ppl really think this way? (a lawyer in this case)...
Came across this 'lovely' video... would like your opinion on this....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDqWGtykYNE
BTW - I COMPLETELY disagree with the speaker, I would have her jailed.
Gregory A. Butler — July 11, 2010
Look, this ad's target audience is RAPISTS and POTENTIAL RAPISTS.
So of course it's not all PC!
It's not going to say that "rape is wrong" or anything like that - it's going to appeal to the base self interest of it's audience in NOT GOING TO PRISON.
And if this ad successfully reaches it's target market and prevents some of them from raping women, then it's all good, no matter how morally or politically objectionable the ad copy is to non rapists.
beth — July 12, 2010
Does it bother anyone else that the first line of this anti-rape ad is a positive statement..."Have sex with someone who hasn't said yes to it" and the second uses the word "could" as the 'big' deterrent. There might as well be a third line saying, "though you could get away with it."
beth — July 12, 2010
As for the title of this post, this ad does not tell men not to rape... it tells them "rape and maybe you'll go to jail."
Molly — July 12, 2010
I would like to see an anti-rape ad that focuses on the faces of women with a very direct text. Something like "Would you rape your mother?" (picture of middle aged/ older woman), "Would you rape your friend?" (picture of teen). Something that would put women in context that is NOT sexual and forces men to see the victims of rape as part of their own worlds, not some faceless statistic somewhere.
Miranda — July 13, 2010
I would just feel more comfortable with the ad if she had a head. It would make her look like an actual human being.
N — July 18, 2010
"Hey Bros, don't rail on a chick who doesn't want it, even if she's, like, unconscious or just wearing a pair of panties like this trick. Not cuz it's immoral to take advantage of another human being's autonomous body, but cuz she could cry rape and send your ass to jail. Then, like, YOU could be raped, which would be totally gay! Gross!"
Ugh.
N — July 19, 2010
"But don't worry, bj's don't count. Holla!"
Jamie — July 19, 2010
Re: appealing to base self interest rather than higher minded empathy: Is maintaining ideological purity really more important than preventing rape? It seems to me that the people here advocating preventing rape by trying to appeal to the empathy and abstract moral judgement of rapists or potential rapists are somewhat missing the point; by definition, these people are not very good at the whole empathy thing. The ad someone suggested above, "don't rape because it's wrong", sounds to me like it would be staggeringly ineffective as it's targetted at precisely the sort of person who would be less likely to commit rape anyway. And yet it's assumed that the ideal PC ad with full eye contact from a modestly clothed woman, quotes from Dworkin and appeal to higher moral reasoning of the rapist population would not only be as effective but more effective. I think that's a very big assumption to make.
Gman E Willikers — March 21, 2013
Human beings are social animals. If you seriously want to greatly reduce rape, you must create a campaign that exploits shame. Shame is a very powerful tool. Shame confers the status of social outcast. It worked for cigarettes and it will work for rape. Further, since it would shame only men, it wouldn't immediately be attacked as an immoral tactic.
Sts Two — March 21, 2013
I wonder how effective targeting potential rapists is. At that point would a poster really change their minds? Wouldn't a campaign trying to establish positive male role models be more effective?
oldarney — March 21, 2013
Why have I never seen a rape PSA that encourages healthy sex while encouraging us to report real rapist. And while were at it, can we stop it with the incredibly stupid absolutes.... '"Hasn't said yes" by that standard I rape every time I have sex. And I always get raped when I have sex because I never say yes.
Tom Megginson — March 21, 2013
A few more here: http://workthatmatters.blogspot.ca/2013/03/advertising-rape-culture-in-anti-rape.html
Deltagee — March 21, 2013
Here is one that came out in Canada a couple years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DchyUYRYVlI
Aus Opfersicht — March 22, 2013
Great campaign. Would work only in England though. Here (Germany) having sex with someone who hasn't said yes won't get you into prison. Even having sex with someone who has said no won't get you into prison.
Rebecca — March 22, 2013
I'm partial to Edmonton's "Don't Be That Guy" campaign. "Research is telling us that targeting the behavior of victims is not
only ineffective, but also contributes to and increases self-blame in
survivors. Instead, the SAVE campaigns targets potential offenders -
ultimately the ones who hold the power and responsibility to end sexual
assault." http://www.savedmonton.com/our-campaigns.html
Sam — March 22, 2013
I wonder if it is even theoretically possible for an ad to be as overtly anti-rape and still not taint male sexuality as such with that brush. I think campaigns are a lot more effective if they are not only about negative extrinsic motivation (jail!) but also offer an positive outlook to identify with (learning to talk about sex before having it means better sex! Seriously!). Even though I understand the need for such ads (on the other hand, given that famous Lisak research so often quupted by feminists about most rapes being committed by a tiny percentage of predators, and not due to mistakes like not asking for "yes" accidentally, I'm not sure it can actually be effective) whenever i see ads like that I feel unfairly targeted, and as if there was something inherently wrong with male sexuality, that there's a rapist somewhere hidden in me, and that makes me defensive even though I don't want to be.
CrypticMirror — March 24, 2013
There is also this UK anti-rape ad (one of a series) which seems to be targeted squarely at the "Nice Guy" demographic. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPC-Q2NMwJw
The Subtleties of Anti-Rape Campaigns | Toward Healing & Justice — May 17, 2013
[...] their participation in consensual sex. Good stuff, right? But what to make of enterprises like this one that also send the “don’t rape” message yet offer significantly different motivations for [...]