This is the second part in a series about how girls and women can navigate a culture that treats them like sex objects (see also, part One). Cross-posted at Ms. and Caroline Heldman’s Blog.
The “sex wars” of the 1980s pitted radical feminists, who claimed that female sexual objectification is dehumanizing, against feminists concerned about legal and social efforts to control and repress female sexuality. Over a decade of research now shows that radical feminists were right to be highly concerned.
Getting back to the “sex wars” and how radical feminists were right, women who grow up in a culture with widespread sexual objectification tend to view themselves as objects of desire for others. This internalized sexual objectification has been linked to problems with mental health (e.g., clinical depression, “habitual body monitoring”), eating disorders, body shame, self-worth and life satisfaction, cognitive functioning, motor functioning, sexual dysfunction, access to leadership, and political efficacy. Women of all ethnicities internalize objectification, as do men to a lesser extent.
Beyond the internal effects, sexually objectified women are dehumanized by others and seen as less competent and worthy of empathy by both men and women. Furthermore, exposure to images of sexually objectified women causes male viewers to be more tolerant of sexual harassment and rape myths. Add to this the countless hours that most girls/women spend primping and competing with one another to garner heterosexual male attention, and the erasure of middle-aged and elderly women who have little value in a society that places women’s primary value on their sexualized bodies.
Theorists have also contributed to understanding the harm of objectification culture by pointing out the difference between sexy and sexual. If one thinks of the subject/object dichotomy that dominates thinking in Western culture, subjects act and objects are acted upon. Subjects are sexual, while objects are sexy.
Pop culture sells women and girls a hurtful lie: that their value lies in how sexy they appear to others, and they learn at a very young age that their sexuality is for others. At the same time, being sexual, is stigmatized in women but encouraged in men. We learn that men want and women want-to-be-wanted. The yard stick for women’s value (sexiness) automatically puts them in a subordinate societal position, regardless of how well they measure up. Perfectly sexy women are perfectly subordinate.
The documentary Miss Representation has received considerable mainstream attention, one indicator that many are now recognizing the damaging effects of female sexual objectification.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gkIiV6konY]
To sum up, widespread sexual objectification in U.S. popular culture creates a toxic environment for girls and women. The following posts in this series provide ideas for navigating new objectification culture in personally and politically meaningful ways.
Comments 46
Anna Cook — July 6, 2012
The “sex wars” of the 1980s pitted radical feminists, who claimed that female sexual objectification is dehumanizing, against feminists concerned about legal and social efforts to control and repress female sexuality. Over a decade of research now shows that radical feminists were right to be highly concerned.
While I didn't personally live through the "sex wars" of the 80s, I am an historian of gender and sexuality and have read a number of memoirs and primary source materials about the pornography debates of that era. I would argue that while the pro-sex feminists were, indeed, concerned about free expression, calls for censorship, and sexual expression by consenting adults, it's a false dichotomy to claim that many of them weren't ALSO concerned with the way mainstream culture represented female sexuality. It's not so much that the radical feminists were "highly concerned" about sexual objectification while others were unconcerned about it. It's just that the others saw the solution in creating less dehumanizing sexual imagery and more feminist sexual scripts and sharing them, rather than working to erase and repress the representations of sexuality we don't like.
I'm sure you could find people who would argue that there's nothing harmful about any type of sexual representation, and that those who critically analyze sexual culture are just "overthinking" it. But in my experience, pro-sex feminists take sexual culture very seriously indeed, and see sexual expression -- yes, even visual sexual culture -- as one pathway out of dehumanizing sexual objectification.
Alex Odell — July 6, 2012
The difficult thing for our culture seems to be what qualifies as healthy, non-shameful sexuality, and what is objectification. For women, being sexy basically equates you with being a sexual object for others to enjoy. Anything else and you're a slut (and even then, you're still probably a slut). I was watching Haywire, and the protagonist, Gina Carano, was kicking ass and being confident (believably, no fighting fuck toys in that movie) which totally enhanced her attractiveness. And I was thinking 'Wow, if they ever did a Wonder Woman movie, she should definitely get the part', until I realized they would never cast someone like her. They're always gonna go for the skinny sex doll, even when she's supposed to be a strong superheroine, because women in movies have to be sexy, and there's only one kind of sexy.
Snuhfoo — July 7, 2012
Thank you for the sexy vs sexual distinction. The idea that women should always look sexy, yet id they have sex they are sluts, has always seemed confusing and in conflict with itself. But when you differentiate sexy vs sexual it's actually scarily consistent.
Tuesday Teasers: Stuff I’ve Been Reading #12 - The Pursuit of Harpyness — July 10, 2012
[...] sexual “objectification” always a bad thing? Some say yes, some say no. (Full disclosure, I’m in the “no” [...]
Oh We’re Totally Post-Feminism… « Dead Wild Roses — July 13, 2012
[...] Feminism is fighting the good fight attempting to make society a better place for women. Feminism is dealing with the mischaracterizations and stereotypes that hurt women in our society, but the fight is far from over. I may have already posted this video, but I found the extended trailer of Miss-representation on youtube. Thank you Sociological Images. [...]
Víkendové surfovanie « life in progress — July 15, 2012
[...] článkov o sexuálnej objektifikácii – 1. časť (čo to je?), 2. časť (ako škodí?) a 3.časť (ako proti nej [...]
Feminism, Media, and Technology in the News | Fembot Collective — July 15, 2012
[...] Objectification (Part 1): What is It? / Sexual Objectification (Part 2): The Harm This is the first part in a series about how girls and women can navigate a culture that treats [...]
De gereedschapskist: alles over seksobjecten « De Zesde Clan — July 27, 2012
[...] zijn voor mannen. (Want: seks-object.) Er komen steeds meer aanwijzingen dat die houding een negatief effect heeft op vrouwen en meisjes: Pop culture sells women and girls a hurtful lie: that their value lies in how sexy they appear [...]
Diariamente, mulheres normais são reduzidas à partes sexuais por homens... e por mulheres | Jezebel Brasil — July 30, 2012
[...] Images recentemente publicou uma (altamente recomendável) explicação em quatro partes sobre objetificação sexual, com um aviso: O dano causado pela objetificação generalizada da [...]
James H — August 22, 2012
Men are harmed by media images and unrealistic body standards. Few men look like underwear models. It seems like everywhere you look now are ribbed shirtless dudes. How does that effect young men and boys self-esteem? But for some reason, objectification for a female audience is cool.
Our Ladies of Action: What I Want From An All-Female Expendables And What I Really Don’t Want « The UnLady — November 17, 2012
[...] some fantastic articles over at Sociological Images that sum up what sexual objectification is and why it’s harmful. In summary let me just say that there’s a big difference between sexual [...]
Τι είναι η σεξουαλική αντικειμενοποίηση; | ΚΑΜΕΝΑ ΣΟΥΤΙΕΝ — February 6, 2013
[...] Sexual Objectification Series (Sociological Images): - Part 1, What is it? - Part 2, The harm - Part 3, Daily rituals to stop - Part 4, Daily rituals to [...]
“They know, that I know, that they know…” — February 13, 2013
[...] eine frauenfeindliche Gesellschaft befördern. Werbung reproduziert diese Gesellschaft und hat Anteil an vielen genderbasierten [...]
Navigating a Culture of Sexual Objectification | elizabeththethird — March 13, 2013
[...] Part Two: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/07/06/sexual-objectification-part-2-the-harm/ [...]
Дневник Лизы — April 3, 2013
[...] главы 1. Что такое сексуальное овеществление. и 2. Чем вредит сексуальное овеществление. А позже должна появиться статья “О новых [...]
SISTAR19: Begone, Calling Them “Objectified” Any Longer | The Grand Narrative — April 11, 2013
[...] of each, see the original post, and I highly recommend also reading Parts 2, 3, and 4 on the harm caused by objectification, and the daily rituals to stop and start doing to avoid that respectively. Like Gender [...]
Navigating a Culture of Sexual Objectification – holdupnow — July 3, 2013
[...] Part Two: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/07/06/sexual-objectification-part-2-the-harm/ [...]
Rote Lippen, offener Mund, welche Frau läuft nicht dauernd so rum? | Drop the thought — August 1, 2013
[...] da die Darstellung nicht sexualisiert sei. Auf meinen Vorwurf der Objektifizierung mit all ihren negativen Konsequenzen geht niemand ein. Ich frage mich, welche Kompetenz der Werberat eigentlich zum Thema [...]
| Is Barbie Really Such a Big Deal?—What “Unapologetic” Brings to Light — February 14, 2014
[…] cause for concern, the internalization of sexual objectification is equally disturbing. Heldman writes that “women who grow up in a culture with widespread sexual objectification tend to view themselves as […]
Delving Deeper | accidentallyreflective — March 11, 2014
[…] by SocImages contributor Caroline Heldman. The aim is to define sexual objectification, refute the myth that it’s empowering, and offer strategies for navigating objectification culture.” Source: […]
Steve Corner — March 26, 2014
None of this is "scientific." What a load of crap. It's all "theorists" (unscientific ones, at that), that are making these claims.
discordia » SteelSeries — June 21, 2014
[…] I’ve used a lot from the presentation with Caroline Heldman below, but also the articles on Sociological Images. (Part 3 and Part […]
George — July 18, 2016
Seems like a two way sword to me. I'm a guy by the way. I like to think I'm a feminist but I might be short-sighted.
Hmm.. Sexual liberation is just way too important to censor potentially damaging images. I still don't think women should be shamed by how they dress or what movies, advertisements, or films, videos, or pictures they choose to be in.Censorship shaming is akin to female repression. I don't think its an accident that the most repressive cultures (some traditional arabic cultures, victorian culture, etc) were/are very short on womens rights. Any kind of repression is wrong imo and a restriction of freedom and/or acceptance (of sexuality, orientation, choices of consenting adults) is bad even if could be/was gender neutral.
From my perspective the real problem is the perception (by men and women) of womens bodies "standards" and women's "acceptable" behavior (a person to be acted upon) rather than the actual media. Its a problem when (in the workplace or social interaction) women are seen as or made to feel like an object (someone to be acted on) or that they don't have intellectual or emotional value (another sense of the word "object").
Sure media effects people (it exists in a feedback loop kind of). I acknowledge it can cause the problems you listed.I think its possible to navigate a media saturated world though.
I would think that the adults could be a little more mature, less impressionable, and think about the context of what they see. I would think that that parents could...idk... maybe not let there impressionable children watch tv, read fashion magazines, or view potentially hazardous material. Parents could teach girls that having a boyfriend or man isn't something to put a ton of value into (or any value into).
Kids really need to have it drilled into them to be independent and to not worry about lookism. Worked pretty well with me (I think), but I didn't face the same issues as women and girls. I'm a white male and I am privileged...I get that.
Maybe extremely careful parenting and mindfulness aren't a solution. I don't know how to fix the effects of objectification media and they certainly are serious but I think that censorship and shaming isn't the answer. This is weird because its not like all women/men have the problems you listed or are effected significantly by such media. Clearly, there's a sociological impact but that doesn't translate to necessary or probable individual impact; so I guess there's hope there. Maybe just talking about it will prove to enough. Maybe I'll come back and delete my comment. It's horribly written.
Why Kim Kardashian's Nude Selfie Does not Empower Women in Any Way — January 17, 2017
[…] break the internet)…We need to stop “seeing” a woman as just a body or as a sexual object, we need to stop allowing all of these, you are much more than your body, how about you display […]
Homework Helper - 6 Homework that is useful Applications Could Save You Time - Pieter Iepsma — October 8, 2019
[…] some back pro academic writers ground details about homework market.com the subject. A number of https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/07/06/sexual-objectification-part-2-the-harm/ the research apps even understand to alert you conflicting classes or exams. You may get homework […]
WEDNESDAY’S MOTHER OR: THESE METHODS HOMEWORK HELPER WON’T INITIATE ACTION – EverythingSocialWork.net — October 9, 2019
[…] organisations that they have to act in order to contain growing tuition. Country wide, community https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/07/06/sexual-objectification-part-2-the-harm/ institution leaders are involved that decreasing enrollment will probably squeeze most of their […]
WEBSITE SELECT: MAKE ME Some FRESHMAN-A ABSOLUTELY FREE TOOL MEANT FOR ORGANIZING COLLEGE Homework Helper OR UNIVERSITY APPLICATIONS » — October 9, 2019
[…] pick can be Make Me any Freshman , a tool young people can use to tidy up the college software https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/07/06/sexual-objectification-part-2-the-harm/. Narrow down their email list of 600 schools just by filtering regarding state, WEBSITE ADDRESS, […]
SCHOLARSHIP COMES TO AN END: SCHOLARSHIP SEEK HOMEWORKMARKET OUT TIMELINE – trotta marmi — October 10, 2019
[…] the first of senior calendar year. I guess them remains to be found! Focus on local news for grant https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/07/06/sexual-objectification-part-2-the-harm/ announcements along with […]
www.fdsfsdf.com — February 5, 2020
Thank you for some other informative site. Where
else may I get that kind of info written in such a perfect
approach? I have a project that I'm simply now running on, and I've been on the look
out for such info.