This spring the Chronicle of Higher Education offered an in-depth look at the number of highly educated people receiving federal aid. Though, on average, they are still doing better than people without college degrees, these populations have not been immune to the recession.
While I sensed an undercurrent of classism in the article (e.g., “how could someone like me be on aid”), it offered an interesting profile of the post-graduate degree job outlook, especially for people with a PhD. Notably, it reminds us just how risky pursuing graduate work can be; 70% of all faculty are now off the tenure-track. That often means that they teach part-time, have no benefits, and face semester-to-semester job insecurity.
These faculty could probably do something else, but many of them are trying to realize a dream that they’ve spent 10 to 15 years of their lives working towards. So, they continue to teach part-time for relatively low pay and participate in a job market that, for the most part, opens up only once a year.
For more on the economics and politics of academic labor, read Keith Hoeller’s The Future of the Contingent Faculty Movement.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 30
Alex — June 19, 2012
With information like this out for the world to see, I'm amazed that people still pursue PhDs when they're not 100% sure they want to live that life.
Furthermore, I find it ridiculous just how many "scholarly" articles I've seen cited in mass media that use ONLY undergraduate participants. Can you please do a post about that?! Some references:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/opinion/sunday/how-depressed-people-use-the-internet.html
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/frontal-cortex/2012/06/daniel-kahneman-bias-studies.html
USE YOUR DEGREES, PEOPLE! General population =! undergrads.
Xiao Mao — June 19, 2012
Oh, look- now they're poor like the rest of us. /s
Xavier Molénat — June 19, 2012
I think the title is misleading : actually, we're talking about PhDs who received food stamps OR other forms of federal aid (or both). How many of them depend on food stamps, we cannot say from the survey
decius — June 19, 2012
Why the assumption that PhDs think that they are all going into tenured positions? The field of higher education is not expected to expand exponentially, is it? Or is the typical doctorate student disconnected from reality, in that they think that the typical doctorate can become a teacher, ever.
JenniferH — June 19, 2012
I'm one of the 70% non-tenure faculty. I don't have a Phd so I don't expect my tenure possibilities to be all that great, but it's depressing to see how poor my chances really are. I wanted to go for a Phd but now what's the point? So I can get the same poorly paid job I have now? And believe me, I would LOVE to get something else, but where I am I haven't been able to find anything better.
anon — June 19, 2012
I hope the author is merely describing the grip of the sunk cost fallacy, rather than endorsing it?
Mph — June 20, 2012
As a PhD research scientist for the last 25 years, I would like to state that you get your degree and you take your chances. The rates of attrition have been stagering for as long as I have been in acedemia. Its been this way for the last 25 years. I think that we should be putting greater effort into placing PhD's into industrial positions, rather than the dream of the academic position. In fact I would also suggest that university pay scales actually should be more in line with what the Federal Government pays research scientists, which would result in considerable savings for the public and perhaps afford an opportunity to hire more young faculty.
Unemployment and Underemployment Mythbusting – Bridget Magnus and the World as Seen from 4'11" — June 20, 2012
[...] If getting a degree were some kind of magic “get a good job” spell, we wouldn’t have hundreds of thousands of people with graduate degrees taking food stamps. [...]
An accidental PhD — June 20, 2012
The PhD has very little currency. Universities pump them out to increase the supply pool of researchers which they require to analyse data and write manuscripts which, upon acceptance, are currency for tenured professors who need to demonstrate their relevance and value to the university. The more PhD drones that are produced the cheaper this labour pool becomes thus keeping research budgets in check. A better return on investment for the prospective PhD student is a good trade (e.g. someone always needs their drain unplugged yesterday).
This does not mean you should not pursue a PhD. If the topic is your passion, the work fits your lifestyle and you have enough creativity to make your education relevant then by all means go for it. However, choose your advisor wisely and make sure there are many benefits in it for you before you start because you can be sure universities don't hand out PhD's for altruistic reasons.
Yes, I've done the PhD routine and been one of the roughly 60% who actually finished what they started. While I do work in research, I am happy to not work for a university and be subject to the academic hazing rituals that occur after graduate school.
LuLu — June 21, 2012
What is also interesting is the number of graduate students on food stamps or other form of subsidized aid. This is especially true for those schools or fields that aren't as well funded.
J Clark — July 1, 2012
Did anyone bother to do the calculations? According to the posted data, the percentage of people with MAs or higher receiving food stamps OR other assistance went from .68% to 1.63%. Over the same time period the percentage of Americans receiving food stamps ALONE went from about 8% to about 13%. See:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/12/08/131905683/a-grim-record-one-in-seven-americans-is-on-food-stamps
Those overall percentages would presumably be even higher if "other assistance" was included. Now tell me again that graduate education is not a good investment, although it should perhaps include a stronger dose of statistical reasoning.
Jim
“The Dirty Little Secret of Higher Education” « InnerG — July 11, 2012
[...] benefit that many of these scholars are receiving is food assistance. The number of folks with PhDs receiving food stamps has practically tripled from 2007 to 2010. This data only includes people who self-report to the [...]
Awesome Idea: Cut Down on Number of Men in Science — July 11, 2012
[...] related: High growth in number of people with advanced degrees on welfare. Of course, not all is a testament to the uselessness of their degrees. Much of that also has to do [...]
“The Dirty Little Secret of Higher Education.” | re/search — July 17, 2012
[...] benefit that many of these scholars are receiving is food assistance. The number of folks with PhDs receiving food stamps has practically tripled from 9,776 in 2007 to 33,655 in 2010. That only includes people who [...]
Garygech — November 25, 2012
1% of the population has Schizophrenia or severe Bipolar disorder rendering them unable to work. The data demonstrates this simple trend.
The number of PhDs on food stamps triples. [image] — January 5, 2014
[…] [Read more: sociologicalimages] […]
Hunger in College | Rubber Ducky Regatta — April 22, 2015
[…] Wade, L. (2012, June 19). The Number of PHDs on Food Stamps Triples. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from The Society Pages: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/06/19/the-number-of-phds-on-food-stamps-triples/ […]