Cross-posted at North Atlantic Books Communities.
Edward Said famously argued that the West uses the East as an inverted mirror, imagining them to be everything the West is not. In a book titled Orientalism, he showed us how this perceived binary separating the Semitic East and the Christian West has traditionally manifested itself in art through romanticized scenes of Eastern cultures presented as alien, exotic, and often dangerous.
European painters of the 19th century turned to backdrops of harems and baths to invoke an atmosphere of non-European hedonism and tantalizing intrigue. Ingre’s 1814 Grande Odalisque , for example, depicts a concubine languidly lounging about, lightly dusting herself with feathers as she peers over her shoulder at the viewer with absent eyes. The notions of hedonistic and indulgent sex are bolstered by hints to opium-induced pleasure offered by the pipe in the bottom right corner. Images like this prompted viewers to imagine the Middle East as a distant region of sex, inebriants, and exciting exotic experiences.
Orientalism continues to inflect popular culture, but because we see ourselves differently now, we see them differently as well. The rise of Islamic fundamentalism in the East, and the corollary Islamophobia of the West has shifted the focus to violence coupled with religious fervor. Take for example an image from a February New York Times article entitled “Afghan Official Says Women’s Shelters are Corrupt.”
The story is about the Afghan government’s desire to take over all Western-established shelters which they claim are “more concerned with the budget than the women.” It’s an article about bettering women’s support, community and safe havens, an act many Westerners would deem progressive in a way they wouldn’t usually view the region. However, the photo that was chosen for this article offers all the classic stereotypes held about the Middle East by depicting entirely veiled women who are shut indoors surrounded only by symbols of religion. The viewer sees two women, in both a hijab and niqab, separated onto two beds with looks of utter despondency; one looks down at her hands while the other stares off into the space ahead of her. In the center of the room is a young girl, blurred by the long exposure of the camera which attempted to capture her in the act of seemingly fervent prayer. Behind the praying young woman is an even younger girl sitting on a bed with a baby on her lap. Rather than depicting the officials who are rallying for female empowerment and institutional improvement, the photo that was chosen paints an image of silenced religious females.
Often imagery is more powerful and memorable than words and in some cases the photographs chosen to accompany the news are less than representational of the story at hand. This instance is typical of the Western media’s predilection for reinforcing Western notions about the East through imagery, instead of finding common ground between two regions that many believe are naturally separated by ideology. Thus orientalism lives on, transformed from its roots but maintaining its destructive stereotypes.
Adam Schwartz is an undergraduate at University of California, Berkeley entering his final year in the Media Studies program. He is currently preparing to write his thesis analyzing the gender and racial implications of the American Apparel advertising campaigns. When he isn’t in school he can be found biking along the beautiful California coast or working for the Berkeley Student Cooperative.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 27
Andrew Paige — August 9, 2011
I fail to see how Afghan Muslim women wearing hijabs and niqabs is a stereotype. Afghanistan is a highly religious nation, where many women openly choose to wear these articles of clothing due to their religious affinities and beliefs. If one were to create an article about corruption within an Italian Catholic Boys shelter, would it be "stereotypical" to portray them dressed in Habits and surrounded by crosses? Wouldn't that be an honest representation of a common recurrence there?
How much better could the article be, if it had contained say; a photo of a nameless bureaucrat in a suit? Perhaps pointing off at something and mid-sentence? I believe exhibiting a personalized look at the goings-on within the shelter provides a better emotional context for the article; it draws the reader in and forces them to be thoughtful about the lives of the women who are being neglected.
Perhaps it would be less "orientalized" if it were a photo of them eating fast food at the mall.
Elena — August 9, 2011
Ingres loved the Turkish bath/serraglio/odalisque theme, or just any random nude or bathing woman so he could paint acres of soft, plump, featureless, boneless female flesh. And the funniest part is that the odalisque's features are those of a French woman of his time (compare her hairstyle and face with this portrait of a countess, for example).
At least Delacroix, when he went Orientalist, it was because he had travelled to Morocco and Algeria and taken lots of sketches there.
SS — August 9, 2011
Nice work, Adam. A clear example of how badly we need an Other in order to define the Self. My recent work on a project about Afghan women reveals their essential notions on freedom, protection and institutional corruption to be no different than ours. But, as usual, the media emphasizes differences and perpetuates the binary when it chooses an image that depicts Afghan women looking as alien, vulnerable and subjugated as possible.
And, wow, yeah- it's interesting to think about how the West regarded itself as the inhibited to the East's perceived hedonist, where now that appears to have reversed. I wish there were more opportunities for people to think about what that means...
Cocojams Jambalayah — August 9, 2011
While I'm sure that this is true, in my opinion, ironically the two images you selected for your post don't fit your premise. The painting appears to me to be of a naked White woman lounging in a bedroom. Neither the woman nor the room has any "exotic" appearance, as far as I can tell except perhaps for the small peacock fan she holds in one hand.
The second image of the Muslim women in a domitory room along with a young girl holding a baby appears to my non-professional photographer's eye to be aesthetically pleasing in its starkness. I liked the color contrasts of the black beds, white sheets or covers, white curtains & garments, the purple & black worn by the praying girl, and the red & green clothing worn by the children and the red carpet and rug. I wondered if the women were posed, but didn't conclude that they or the children were "silenced" as much as silent because of their poverty and the crisis that brought them to the shelter (but also because of boredom?)
As a matter of fact, instead of making the point that the Aghan officials claim that the "Western-established shelters are more concerned with the budget than the women", I focused on the lack of anything else in the room but the people, and the beds with their (in my "priviledged" opinion) very thin mattresses and no covers. If this room was in the USA or some other Western nation, I'd expect to see more "material things" in the room-things like toys, and books, and magazines, and tv, and a lap top or two. You know, things that would have been purchased with that budget that the Afghan government was concerned about. Besides, you wrote about Westerners creating "destructive stereotypes" of Eastern women. And unless I misunderstood, it was an Afghan reporter/photographer who took this photo. And, in my opinion, the photograph didn't convey any negative images to me of Muslim women and children. Nor did it convey any images of "exotizied" females-which I take it that the term "Orientalism" suggests.??That said, although this may not be your point, that photograph of the Muslim women and children in that stark but somewhat beautiful (to me) domitory room does prove that individuals within the same culture and/or within different cultures get different messages from the same images.
Lottie — August 9, 2011
Thanks for an interesting post. But I think you ignore the possibility that the women in the last picture may not have wanted to look full into the camera, and so it was them controlling their representation here (to some degree) rather than the photographer choosing how to depict them.
Andrew — August 9, 2011
A particularly striking quote from the text of the article:
From the article's perspective, the notion that the government's move is a "progressive" one is hardly uncontroversial, and quite possibly very dubious. So it would be extremely misleading to represent the proponents in a heroic light, and really the stuff of propaganda to suggest that their actions here are unambiguously for "women's empowerment."On the other hand, it seems like the fairest possible illustration for the article - which does allow both sides to say their piece - is a picture of life inside one of the shelters. The photo here takes us to a place most of us have never been, and have no real perspective on, rather than merely showing us the talking head behind a quote. It gives us space to imagine what life might be like for the people most directly affected by this debate, and reminds us that the issue is not just about politics. Nothing is romanticized or, as far as I can tell, embellished; it strikes me as a completely responsible and compassionate portrait of the people who happened to be in front of the camera.Now, in a devoutly religious country where an enormous number of women wear veils, it's a bit ludicrous to make the case that a photo of a veiled, praying woman is merely "maintaining....destructive stereotypes." The destructive stereotype is not the very obvious empirical fact of the clothing and faith, but rather the meanings and symbolism that are often mistakenly attributed to these choices. A good documentary photo along these lines should not attempt to obscure reality in order to avoid brushing up against uncomfortable ideas; rather, it should capture the humanity that's often obscured behind these ideas. I think this photo does a splendid job of that, and the Times should be commended for selecting it over a photo that would, as the blogger might have it, skew the reader's allegiances toward one side of the debate.
Kat — August 9, 2011
This is without a shadow of a doubt the worst post I have yet seen on this (for the reason Adam pointed out). I don't blame Adam, the undergrad. I blame Lisa and Gwen, the professors.
Henry — August 10, 2011
It seems with this post, that the topic is not done justice by the argument. The issue of the photo either needs more analysis or else it is unconvincing as a tool or indicator of Orientalism.
Our occupation of Afghanistan will inevitably produce moral conflicts. Humanism and feminism would implore us to intervene on the behalf of those hurt by religious orthodoxy. But the horrors of colonialism and neocolonialism give us pause. Is it possible to apply political and social pressure on other cultures while at the same time refraining from imposing our will upon the rest of the world?
Said is great, a good starting point from which to talk about this issue. But the works of Lila Abu-Lughod (Veiled Sentiments, etc.) and Spivak (Can The Subaltern Speak) give a more pointed feminist perspective.
Orientalism & the Representation of Middle Eastern Women | NAB Communities — September 1, 2011
[...] article was originally featured as a guest blog by NAB intern Adam Schwartz on The Society Pages, and the response to the article was immense. The Society Pages has granted us permission to repost [...]
a response to the othering of Muslim women – hey — January 3, 2013
[...] Sources:http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/08/09/orientalism-and-the-representation-of-middle-eastern... [...]
CULTURE | Orientalism & the Representation of Middle Eastern Women | NAB Communities — March 1, 2013
[...] article was originally featured as a guest blog by NAB intern Adam Schwartz on The Society Pages, and the response to the article was immense. The Society Pages has granted us permission to repost [...]
Wadjda Is An Important Film For Saudi Women And American People — July 9, 2013
[...] to see this film because any news we get about Saudi Arabia or anyplace in the Middle or Far East, is filtered through a Western perspective. Many people, of all walks of life, make the mistake of seeing something that is different from [...]
L Tello — June 13, 2014
Hello. I have recently struck up an interest in the middle east/ the orient. I know that the western babylon society complicates things through media and such and such and I and I am concerned with gaining the best and most neutral (i.e. the most true) knowledge and learning on the orient. If anyone has references or resources where I and I can learn properly about these diverse cultures it would be greatly appreciated. This blog has pointed out the obvious to me, but I had not even thought about this before. How messed up is the media?
Anyway email I at liamt13@yahoo.com
Gaston Casimir Saint-Pierre – Various Works | medievalpoc — October 6, 2014
[…] Orientalism, Orientalism and Exoticizing of Women […]
Orientalism & the Representation of Middle Eastern Women | North Atlantic Books — October 9, 2015
[…] article was originally featured as a guest blog by NAB intern Adam Schwartz on The Society Pages, and the response to the article was immense. The Society Pages has granted us permission to repost […]
A Better Haqq | Fear The Swarth — August 29, 2019
[…] The Hunzakut, the Haqq HVT, or the new Ghulam Doctor aren’t issues from this perspective. While I generally agree with Impetuous Order on this front and am glad that the line has been improving, it’s also not what this essay is about and I already have so many side essays this thing has inspired. Generally, everyone’s better off if the models and art pieces picked for fanservice aren’t also the ones with terrible, terrible histories. […]
German Journalist — February 7, 2021
First of all: Yes, media is probably not always doing a good job on covering whats happening in the middle east. There is a lot to learn and to reflect about, so that the images news article paint come closer to reality.
But as a journalist I am a bit astonished about how this scholar is thinking of the photograph in the New York Times article. Its a picture of women living in one of these shelters and therefore not immediately a stereotype - but reality.
Corruption is a topic where it is very hard to find a matching picture. Considering that the story plays in a country far away and very different from the US, I am convinced, that its better to give the readers an image of how such a women shelter looks like than to show some - for US readers probably unknown - politician or person fighting against the corruption there.
Adam Schwartz is completely ignoring the lines beneath the photos as well, where one can get interesting information about which woman are living in the shelter - and why. (I wished the article itself would talk more about this as well though).
I know, there is a lot to improve with media coverage. But before criticizing it just like that, a scholar should also talk with journalists about their work and their intention for choosing such a picture.