In the 1940s and ’50s dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, a synthetic pesticide better known as DDT, was used to kill bugs that spread malaria and typhus in several parts of the world. DDT was argued to be toxic to humans and the environment in the famous environmental opus, Silent Spring. It was banned by the U.S. government in 1972.
Before all that, though, it was sprayed in American neighborhoods to suppress insect populations. The new movie Tree of Life has a great scene re-enacting the way that children would frolick in the spray as the DDT trucks went by. Here are two screen shots from the trailer:
Searching around, I also found some vintage footage (the person who uploaded the clip doesn’t specify the documentary):
The scene reminded me of an old post we’d written, below, featuring advertisements for the pesticide, one with the ironic slogan “DDT is good for Me-e-e!”
—————————
DDT was a pesticide marketed to housewives (and many others). We later discovered it to be an environmental toxin. Below are three of the advertisements (via Mindfully and KnowDrama and noticed thanks to John L.):
DDT-laced wallpaper, from Copyranter:
(text for this final ad after the jump)
Text:
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.“The great expectations held for DDT have been realized. During 1946, exhaustive scientific tests have shown that, when properly used, DDT kills a host of destructive insect pests, and is a benefactor of all humanity.
Pennsalt produces DDT and its products in all standard forms and is now one of the country’s largest producers of this amazing insecticide. Today, everyone can enjoy added comfort, health and safety through the insect-killing powers of Pennsalt DDT products . . . and DDT is only one of Pennsalt’s many chemical products which benefit industry, farm and home.
GOOD FOR FRUITS – Bigger apples, juicier fruits that are free from unsightly worms . . . all benefits resulting from DDT dusts and sprays.
GOOD FOR STEERS – Beef grows meatier nowadays . . . for it’s a scientific fact that compared to untreated cattle beef-steers gain up to 50 pounds extra when protected from horn flies and many other pests with DDT insecticides.
FOR THE HOME – Helps to make healthier and more comfortable homes . . . protects your family from dangerous insect pests. Use Knox-Out DDT Powders and Sprays as directed . . . then watch the bugs ‘bite the dust’!
FOR DAIRIES – Up to 20% more milk . . . more butter . . . more cheese . . . tests prove greater milk production when dairy cows are protected from the annoyance of many insects with DDT insecticides like Knox-Out Stock and Barn Spray.
GOOD FOR ROW CROPS – 25 more barrels of potatoes per acre . . . actual DDT tests have shown crop increases like this! DDT dusts and sprays help truck farmers pass these gains along to you.
FOR INDUSTRY – Food processing plants, laundries, dry cleaning plants, hotels . . . dozens of industries gain effective bug control, more pleasant work conditions with Pennsalt DDT products.
Comments 85
O Escriba » E o DDT era bom… — April 27, 2009
[...] Outros cartazes desse tipo sobre o DDT podem ser vistos aqui. [...]
E o DDT era bom… | Trezentos — April 27, 2009
[...] cartazes desse tipo sobre o DDT podem ser vistos aqui. Hoje sabemos bem o que esse poderoso pesticida pode causa à saúde humana, aos animais, ao [...]
Alexandra, but not that Alexandra — February 1, 2010
Perhaps DDT used in the average household is not a great idea, but what about all the people dying of malaria because DDT has been banned?
Julian — February 5, 2010
Indeed, DDT is still approved by the WHO for indoor residual spraying, which has far less potential for environmemntal harm than agricultural spraying - and that requires orders of magnitude more DDT.
Gary — May 12, 2010
@Alexandra @ Julian...so keep using DDT because its not a good idea in homes but its ok outside the home? We shouldn't ban it because people die from malaria? It has far less potential for environemntal harm than agricultural spraying? I have an idea, just stop using it and find other healthier solutions, look at other possibilities. Meanwhile the bee populations throughout the world plumets to all time lows that never seen before. Chemicals/insecticides are having a disasterous effect on our support systems. The sooner we live with the natural world intead of agaisnt it and trying to control everything the better off we may be.
Check out this idea for malaria at TED http://www.ted.com/talks/nathan_myhrvold_could_this_laser_zap_malaria.html
Marc Brenman — December 5, 2010
In regard to "We later discovered it to be a horrible environmental toxin," well not quite. It was found to cause thinning of egg shells in some wild birds, particularly predators. It has saved, and continues to save, many lives. These "sociological images" are useful and interesting, but the propagandistic and uninformed tone of many of the introductory comments is unnecessary and unhelpful. Frankly, two PhDs should know better.
Rethinking Polio — February 8, 2011
[...] Mothers are propagandized: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/02/01/ddt-is-good-for-me-e-e/ [...]
George — June 27, 2011
DDT is not particularly dangerous to humans. It is less dangerous than many of the pesticides that have replaced it. The environmental problems with DDT are also exaggerated. The problem is not the chemical itself, but the way it was used with indiscriminate spraying and widespread agricultural use causing toxic runoff that killed fish and birds.
Using DDT laced wallpaper to protect against bedbugs or against mosquitos carrying malaria would have a minimal environmental impact but have major benefits.
Many chemicals can be dangerous, and usually that means that the chemicals are regulated and there are strict guidelines for their use. It's a shame that the polemic surrounding this one has caused it to be banned outright.
Anonymous — June 27, 2011
Allow me to jump on the Science bandwagon here. As many have mentioned, DDT is not actually harmful to humans. Malaria, on the other hand, is quite harmful. While the ads are quite amusing, they are not actually wrong. DDT did have most of those positive effects.
Don't get me wrong, when overused and use indiscriminately, DDT can certainly have bad effects on the ecosystem. When used properly, the effects on the environment can be minimal while drastically improving the lives of the human poppulation. As point of fact, those most positively affected are the impoverished in 3rd world nations.
I think the more interesting sociological question is how good science was overcome by hysteria about the effects of "chemicals".
Liz Williams — June 27, 2011
I have to agree with the previous commenters. I love the blog but this post seems awfully short-sighted. You've made a good habit of pointing out that issues like these aren't as black and white as they may seem in the past, but I feel that sentiment has been lost here. DDT may not be perfect, but this post is frankly unfair.
Grafton — June 27, 2011
As Julian says.
DDT is not very harmful to mammals. Modern insecticides one can buy at the grocery store are much more dangerous. My grandfather used to be the locust-control man and traveled around (then British controlled) Kenya to that end. He used to eat a chunk of DDT, like it was fudge, to show that it was harmless. This is maybe, maybe not, responsible for the kidney problems he had about forty years later. If you ate Malathion in such quantities, you'd be poisoned and probably die in short order, and malathion is considered one of the more human-safe insecticides, is commonly used in the US and heck, they put it on children's heads to kill lice.
The thing about DDT is that it does not break down in any reasonable time frame. So it is a horrible environmental toxin when you use it as a crop spray. You're just putting more and more of it out there, it washes off in the rain but it doesn't decompose into something else, it merely gets moved. As locust control, it's a bad idea. Mosquito control items, like the wallpaper, or a DDT impregnated window screen, or, say, if the binding tape on the edges of your mattress were impregnated with DDT to kill bedbugs, those are probably a very good idea. To properly use it, it should be put places where one actually wants it to last, and where it won't get moved.
I know quite a number of people who used to run in the DDT spray off the crop-dusters.
Anonymous — June 27, 2011
On of my favorite bands, Truckstop Honeymoon, have a song called Malathion Man, which is about this and how the kids loved to chase the trucks. http://www.pandora.com/music/song/truckstop+honeymoon/malathion+man
Basio — June 27, 2011
I admit to being appalled by the level of scientific (and legal) misinformation in these comments. I have no idea who has been spreading this misinformation or what they stand to gain by claiming that DDT is somehow this innocent chemical that has been much aligned by propaganda...
This is what we know.
1. DDT, when used as a crop pesticide, accumulates in the environment for devastating effects on wildlife, especially predatory birds but also other species. It then does not go away for a long time.
2. Modern animal testing has shown that DDT, in the quantities that were normally in the environment after crop spraying, DOES have significant effects on mammals. These effects include miscarriages, male infertility, prematurity, neurological abnormalities in young, diabetes and breast cancer. Were DDT to be introduced as a new product today, it would never be approved as a crop pesticide based on this evidence.
3. We don't know if those children running behind the trucks wound up with any health effects. Pretty much everyone in this country has health problems and it's hard to tease out causes or contributing factors. However, the risk to other mammals implies it's probably not a good thing to spray indiscriminately.
4. There is not and has never been a ban against the use of DDT as a vector control means. DDT is widely used in malaria countries to control the disease, even now.
5. At this point, because it was used on crops, most mosquitoes are resistant to DDT anyway. It's potency is fading fast so it is being phased out.
6. Modern resistance to DDT as vector control comes primarily from locals who use it, who object to the smell, the residues on the wall, and the fact that DDT does not kill, and in fact agitates, many other insects. DDT spraying causes things like bedbugs and cockroaches to be more active and thus do more damage.
There is no conspiracy to keep DDT down. It is an unpleasant chemical which had some usefulness in disease control, was used inappropriately to disastrous effects, and at this point is causing more harm than good, especially since there are other pesticides availiable that are more effective and safer when used appropriately.
Kelly — June 27, 2011
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4230 Food for thought!
Another Jack — June 27, 2011
The bans and restrictions on DDT have been devastating to developing nations, many of which saw deaths from malaria jump from single digits to thousands within a year or two of the restrictions. Millions of people have since died of malaria in places where the disease had been nearly eradicated thanks to DDT. All because rich developed nations decided that they shouldn't be allowed to use it (while being able to afford other pesticides themselves). People who claim to advocate for the poor, the vulnerable, the underprivileged should be ashamed of this.
But instead they celebrate it.
Harley47 — June 27, 2011
A couple of comments. One I grew up with DDT on a farm. We used it to spray our milk cows during milking. Used a sprayer much like the ones in your ads. We milked our cows by hand and had to lean against them well we milked. Lots of flies around the barn as yo u might imagine. The second comment is to my knowledge many third world countries have yet to ban DDT.
Sully R — June 28, 2011
my dad and his best friend say that they remember playing in the cloud when the DDT truck came by. it explains a lot about them actually :P
Aoirthoir An Broc — June 28, 2011
Holy Batman Robin! An article on DDT in a leftist space and people comment that actually know what they are talking about...Well mostly..we get these gems of course:
Which is actually as relevant as asking how much breast cancer is related to living, breathing, exposure to moonlight. I love it when folks make claims like: "since we have no facts that shows DDT caused any of these things we'll just 'speculate' that it has and see if we can get away with our dishonest claims"...
Now of course they show kids running around being sprayed by that...I wouldnt want to be sprayed with gas from fluorescent bulbs either. But buying a bulb, using it PROPERLY, yeah..sorry that's just fine.
[links] Link salad legs it on into the week | jlake.com — June 28, 2011
[...] DDT is good for me-e-e — This just creeps me out. [...]
Scientist3875 — July 30, 2011
WOW!!! That's all I can say about some of these posts...
DDT affects the endocrine system (which is extremely important, especially during development). The EPA is not the only health agency that states this chemical is unsafe. Look into the WHO (world health organization) report for starters.
Some (few) countries still use DDT to kill malaria carrying mosquitos but only after a cost benefit analysis determines the risks of using the chemical are outweighed by the benefits.
As for scientific evidence, there is quite a bit of literature on this specific compound. Furthermore, Silent Spring is not the only book proposing such chemicals are having deleterious effects on the environment (read "Our Stolen Future" or "Hormonal Chaos" and others written by scientists who have read and understand the scientific literature). We are facing a number of health issues across the globe, many of which involve chemicals affecting the endocrine system. In fact, there is an entire field of scientists that address such issues (endocrine disruption).
The problem with determining cause and effect relationships is that WE CANNOT DOSE AND THEN STUDY HUMAN SUBJECTS. Instead, we must study other organisms and infer the costs to humans based on what happens to the organisms studied.
IF YOU REALLY THINK THIS CHEMICAL (OR OTHERS) DO NOT CAUSE PROBLEMS IN HUMANS, THEN VOLUNTEER TO BE A TEST SUBJECT. If you are not willing to do that, ask yourself why. Most likely, you will find that you are not willing to take the risk...what does that tell you?
Jazzpast — January 2, 2013
DDT saved thousands of lives World Wide! America is now being infested with the bed bugs and mites that DDT saved us from. Only a matter of time before your home is infested with bed bugs. These bugs won't descriminate your going to see how it feels to live in a third world country right here in the good old U.S.! YOUR GOING TO BE A MISERABLE PEOPLE! Insecticides being sold in the U.S. now are worthless and won't kill bed bugs or mites. No humans have been harmed in any way by DDT! People in the 40's and 50's even ate DDT by the spoon fulls as a suplement. Most of whom lived well into their 80's and 90's! My Grandfather was soaked with DDT every day for years spraying his crops. My Grandfather never even got a cold he lived into his 90's before he died. If bed bugs get in my home I'll make my own DDT it's not that hard to make. If you need it make your own!
Are We Living In The Age Of Stupid? | Transition Now by Kim Martindale — April 18, 2013
[...] DDT is so healthy it can even be sprayed on babies [...]
Weather permitting, Dallas to spray in parts of city seeing ‘significant increases’ in mosquitoes carrying West Nile Virus | City Hall Blog — June 17, 2013
[...] And while the insecticide is Environmental Protection Agency-approved, says the city, you’re reminded to stay indoors during when the clock hits spray-thirty. Also: Do not run behind the trucks, even if you’ve seen Tree of Life. [...]
Southern Imprints of Place and Time | Susan Walters' Blog — September 15, 2013
[...] pause to think that perhaps it was not good for our lungs and skin. We loved playing in the DDT, the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. It was banned in [...]
Toxic Combo of Roundup and Fertilizers Blamed for Tens of Thousands of Deaths | The Health Rebel — April 8, 2014
[…] 6 Thesocietypages.org, DDT […]
Toxic Combo of Roundup and Fertilizers Blamed for Tens of Thousands of Deaths - Waking Times — April 8, 2014
[…] 6 Thesocietypages.org, DDT […]
SillySadie — April 20, 2014
This is an add from the 1950's! This is not a current add.
Did you think it was??
Joe Joe — August 12, 2014
Ha ha ha !!! who hoo! What a bunch of BS. DDT was as safe as baby formula. It was banned by leftists who are eugenics nazis to curb population growth. Read the truth for yourselves and learn something instead of believing propaganda from the rogue EPA and elitists.
http://dwb.unl.edu/Teacher/NSF/C06/C06Links/www.altgreen.com.au/Chemicals/ddt.html
http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-truth-about-ddt-and-silent-spring
http://www.matrixbookstore.biz/ddt.htm
Claudio — September 3, 2014
The clip is not from a documentary, it's from the 2011 film "The Tree of Life" (Brad Pitt, Sean Penn).
Plants and Animals as Commodities at the Institute of Making, UCL | Thinking Like A Mountain — January 30, 2015
[…] Jazzy advertisement for DDT from Penn Salt Chemicals, 1947: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/06/27/ddt-is-good-for-me-e-e/ […]
Kathleen Harris — March 12, 2015
Now a days people are arguing whether vaccines are heathful or harmful, in the mean time their parents, grandparents and greatgrandparents were soaking their houses in DDT. When my wife was on gradeschool summer vacation, the DDT fog trucks would clean out the neighborhood, the kids would run behind the trucks for fun...
Autism and Vaccines: A Matter of Trust - Aspergers101 — March 27, 2015
[…] These are the same people that endorsed smoking IN THE 50S AND 60S, who said DDT was good for us, in fact there were times when entire neighborhoods were sprayed with DDT. You can read more about this at The Society Pages […]
Yractrebor — July 30, 2015
Bring back DDT screw the dam commie liberals they want death and destruction not healthy clean environment. They want cheap pesticides that don't work time to clean house in our government federal and local their Oath of offices get them on treason!
Yractrebor — July 30, 2015
Bring back the DDTs theses Commie Liberals don't want a healthy environment they want death and destruction only . Spend money on pesticides
that don't work BS.Time to clean federal government up and local it takes a few good lawful men to get them on their oath of office for treason cause there not up holding it .
Learning from mistakes: "DDT is good for me-e-e!" - OKResponsibleAg.org — June 8, 2016
[…] The ad is typical for its time. From the end of World War II up through the 1960s, DDT was heavily marketed as a powerful insecticide for both agricultural and home use. There’s a good compilation of other print ads here. […]
DDT is good for me-e-e! - Oklahomans for Food, Farm and Family — July 19, 2016
[…] The ad is typical for its time. From the end of World War II up through the 1960s, DDT was heavily marketed as a powerful insecticide for both agricultural and home use. There’s a good compilation of other print ads here. […]
DDT na zdraví | Mobilní Vlna — May 9, 2017
[…] “DDT Is Good For Me-e-e!” […]
gucci gang — June 18, 2018
boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Alzheimer’s Association Forgets – History Doomed To Repeat Itself – Rebel Siren — March 23, 2019
[…] at the expense of our health and environment? Who can forget hearing about the historical ad, “DDT Is Good For Me-e-e!”? disinformation shills (a.k.a. trolls) that attacked it in defense of DDT. Look at their outrageous […]
Anita Sri-Ananda — June 5, 2021
Interesting that no-one cares that in 2019 229 million people contracted malaria and 409000 of them died, mostly vulnerable members of the population, including children under 5, pregnant mothers, the elderly. I was probably one of the last generation that sprayed DDT liberally on ourselves as well in and around the house because we were living in Ghana at the time and malaria was a killer back then too. DDT is a proven deterrent for mosquitoes and is safe when used correctly. Everyone has an opinion but at least base your opinion on facts, not gossip or unproven and/or unqualified statements.
La Fraude du NOM vs Jackfruit 2 — June 1, 2022
[…] que le DDT doit être utilisé de partout! Edward Bernays semble même avoir inventer la formule « DDT is good for me-e-e […]
Allen — July 5, 2024
When pests invade your home or business, count on our local exterminator pest control service to swiftly and effectively tackle the problem. With our expert team of professionals, we provide 247 solutions tailored to your specific pest issues. From ants and roaches to rodents and termites, we have the knowledge and tools to eliminate pests safely and efficiently. Our locally owned and operated business understands the unique pest challenges of our area, allowing us to deliver targeted treatments for lasting results. Whether you're facing a sudden infestation or want to prevent future pest problems, trust our local exterminator pest control service to restore your peace of mind and protect your property from unwanted intruders.