Rachel O., writing from New Zealand, sent in an interesting example of gendered energy drinks. Other than their being gendered, I thought there were two things worth noting.
First, the only difference between the male and female version of the drink (other than the marketing, which is downright diametrical) is the number of calories. The female version, Angel, is low calorie; the male version, Demon, is not. So dieting, an imperative towards thinness, and femininity (not to mention innocence) are all lumped together in the marketing of the product.
Demon (don’t click… loud, scary music):
Angel (safe to click):
The second thing I thought was interesting about these two drinks was that it took a lot of digging to find evidence that they were made by the same company (though I finally found it here). As far as I can tell, neither website admits the existence of the other. This is a really strong separation of the two products, as if femininity and masculinity threaten to spoil each other, it’s best to keep them as far away from one another as possible. God forbid we know that the makers of the aggressive Demon drink sissy it up to also make the sweet, low cal Angel drink. Best to keep our masculinity and femininity pure.
This reminds me of the fact that Dove and Axe are owned by the same company. The two products are sold with divergent marketing campaigns — the former claims to empower women, the latter produces some of the most sexist advertising on TV — but they are both part of Unilever. Only our ignorance of this fact makes Dove’s marketing strategy seem earnest.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 21
Ryan — September 3, 2010
Thank you! I've had my suspicions about Dove and Axe. Hypergendered products are a hoax.
SP — September 3, 2010
On the one hand, I'm surprised that people get suckered into buying products because they are marketed based on gender. Then I remind myself that most people avoid thinking too hard. ;)
syd — September 3, 2010
That's interesting.
It's also strange that two products that seem nearly identical in function by the same company, but aimed at two different demographics, would avoid association with each other. The hyper-gendering (drink Demon if you are a MANLY MAN who likes to rock out and look at boobies, drink Angel if you are a lovely lady who likes flowers and getting shit done) is obviously a marketing technique, but I bet it would be a much more effective technique to market them jointly somehow.
Phoebe — September 3, 2010
Interesting that Angel actually shows the product and a "nutrition" table. Whereas Demon shows girls "girl of the month"...? Also, your idea of "loud, scary music" Makes me laugh :)
Sarah — September 3, 2010
I love the kitten and the duckling. I mean, were they like, "What can we do to girly this up, just a bit more?"
EGhead — September 3, 2010
Unilever is a HUGE company. The fact that Axe and Dove are both owned by them really doesn't mean much of anything. It's not like the same people are involved in the day-to-day management of those specific brands or their advertising. Not buying Dove products isn't going to send the message to Unilever that Axe is bad; it's going to send the message that the Dove marketing campaigns aren't working and that they should return to the typical tactics.
Matthew — September 3, 2010
Well, their websites aren't too deceptive - if you don't have Javascript turned on the homepage of Angel shows an image for Demon (which I assume is because they run off the same server)
(see http://www.angelenergy.co.nz/images/HomeFlash-Alt.jpg vs http://www.demonenergy.co.nz/images/HomeFlash-Alt.jpg)
Vespers — September 4, 2010
The thing is, Demon is pretty much a sensation here; it is one of the most popular energy drinks, guys and girls. You'll see a can or two in most lecture theaters every morning.
Angel is the thing you might see a couple cans of in the bottom of the chiller in a dairy. Comparing the two isn't really fair. They are hardly in the same category.
lutramania — September 5, 2010
Vespers makes an interesting point. I haven't seen Angel energy drinks for sale here in NZ for a long time, but you can buy Demon everywhere and consumption of the product doesn't seem to be particularly gendered. Considering the sort of symbolism tied up with energy drinks I'm not at all surprised that people of any gender buy the "manly" version. Have to admit, when I first saw the advertising for the Angel drink I couldn't quite figure out if it actually contained any caffeine etc or if it was supposed to look like an energy drink without actually being one (like the cans branded LOL - they're fizzy fruit juice, but look like energy drinks).
I'm not all that surprised by the separation between the products either. A few years ago, several new brands of energy drink were introduced on the NZ market, mostly made by the same company. I think they were testing the waters to see which marketing strategies worked best, hence the gender strategy (amongst others).
Eve — September 10, 2010
It's weird that there is pretty much no content for the girls except for a nutrition label, whereas for the demon drink you can look at jugs and watch cars drive on top of things. Are they unaware that women have personalities that would warrant putting something up on the site? Do they really think we have nothing else to do?