I love this picture!*
It’s a wonderful illustration of the way in which we tend to project a gendered nuclear family model onto animals in ways that make that model seem more “natural” and “universal” than it is. (For the argument, try Donna Haraway’s Teddy Bear Patriarchy.)
Chickens, at least in captivity, do not live in lovely nuclear families like the nice chicken family above. They live in harems with just one rooster and lots of hens. Notice, too, how the hen is looking down (lovingly? maternally?) at her chicks, while the rooster is looking out into the distance (for danger? the protector?). Or maybe he’s checking out all those other “chicks” he gets with.** You know, a man has got to sow his seed. Oh wait, he’s not a man, he’s a CHICKEN!)
Even their bodies match our culturally and historically specific norms. Their height difference nicely matches the ideal in our society for male/female pairs (but not the reality, see here). To take the anthropomorphization further, you can almost see the hen’s fertile hips and the rooster’s strapping shoulders (am I going to far?).
* Unfortunately, I’ve had this picture for a long time and I’m afraid I don’t remember where it came from.
** Did you see that? I managed to get in the infantilization of adult women, um, hens, and the sexualization of young girls, um, chicks.
Comments 6
jessica — January 12, 2008
Great picture, and example!
A book that my sister bought my son, "Who's in a Family" (by Robert Skutch), has a lot of great examples of the non-nuclear family from both social and animal life.
SocProf — January 13, 2008
I find this chicken running theme really cool and very powerful in the sociological points it makes... which prevents from finding anything weird about your focus! :-)
Sociological Images » RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN THE GAY MARRIAGE DEBATE — October 24, 2008
[...] we still (generally) think of marriage as comprised of a man, a woman, and kids, but mutual love and happiness are now central goals of marriage. This idea only emerged in the [...]
K — November 3, 2010
I don't think that's true - chicken families are harem-like, but involve more than one male. Most chickens will mate with the alpha male but some will mate with the non-alpha male.
Polygynous species (just one male and multiple females) are incredibly rare/nonexistant in natural. You'd have better lucky finding polyandrous species.
Zeeqon5 — July 11, 2011
I know this article is three and a half years old, but I love this picture too. I don't know anything about this site and I've never looked at any other page here (I was just looking for this picture, which I had lost; I don't know where I originally found it either), but I just want to point out, in case you or anyone else is still following the comments here, that the chickens' beaks are clipped and their claws removed. Does that signify anything? Like, maybe it's not actually fallacious at all, but rather, it's telling us that if we try to impose our own preconceived notions on nature or other people, then we lose the power to understand and appreciate the world, just as the chickens have lost the power to defend themselves?
:P
payapo — November 23, 2022
maganda beacause im wiling full