{"id":1947,"date":"2009-11-23T20:38:12","date_gmt":"2009-11-24T01:38:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/?p=1947"},"modified":"2009-11-23T20:38:12","modified_gmt":"2009-11-24T01:38:12","slug":"psychology-beats-itself-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/2009\/11\/23\/psychology-beats-itself-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Psychology beats itself up."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/id\/216506\" target=\"_blank\">This recent Newsweek article<\/a> points to some psychological research that has been causing a bit of an upheaval (click <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psychologicalscience.org\/journals\/pspi\/inpress\/baker.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> for the whole 145\u00a0page manuscript\u00a0if you&#8217;re REALLY interested).\u00a0 The gist of it is that one area of the field &#8211; research psychology &#8211; is calling the work of another area\u00a0&#8211; that of therapists and counselors &#8211; &#8220;an unconscionable embarrassment.&#8221;\u00a0 Well, to be specific, a large-scale study has shown that some therapists have a sort of anti-science bias, admitting that they\u00a0&#8220;value personal experience over research evidence&#8221; and that they &#8220;rely more on their own and colleagues&#8217; experience than on science when deciding how to treat a patient.&#8221;\u00a0 This means that even though &#8220;scarf therapy&#8221; might not do a whole lot for you, therapists who hear that it works from their therapist-buddies\u00a0might go ahead and use it on you anyway (and charge you for it)(and expect that it will make you better).\u00a0 The other disturbing half to the problem is that they might choose to use an unorthodox therapy like this even when an effective treatment (e.g., one that has been validated time and again in research trials) is available, because they either don&#8217;t keep up with the literature or don&#8217;t trust that research support is all it&#8217;s cracked up to be.<\/p>\n<p>Well, this is interesting enough in and of itself, and I&#8217;ve had a few debates with clinicians over whether or not empirical support ought to count as the end-all, be-all for selecting therapeutic methods (also please note that I don&#8217;t for a second think that all therapists are like this in the first place.\u00a0 I like to imagine that most of them actually know what they&#8217;re doing).\u00a0 But what&#8217;s also interesting is psychological science&#8217;s accusation of <em>why<\/em> this is occurring: because many undergraduate psychology programs, they claim,\u00a0produce weak scientists, and &#8211; worse! &#8211; these science-weak\u00a0undergraduates often go on to science-weaker graduate programs for which there is often no research requirement (indeed, this is\u00a0the selling point).<\/p>\n<p>In some ways, I\u00a0fear I agree.\u00a0 At the UC level, for example,\u00a0a majority of my Psych majors were ex-Biology students\u00a0on the run from all the math they were expected to complete to get into Med school (where many UC freshmen think they&#8217;re destined to go).\u00a0 When they saw they were expected to take Statistics still, they&#8217;d moan and groan and a lot of them would try and flee to Sociology (where they STILL had to take qualitative methodology, at the very least, if not worse).\u00a0 During research methods, many of my science-phobic students would make it quite clear that they felt this was simply a class they had to get through but that had no real pertinence to them.\u00a0 <em>They<\/em> were going to be therapists and <em>really help people<\/em>, not do all this lame research stuff.\u00a0 I found myself\u00a0constantly pointing out to them that being a\u00a0<em>good<\/em> therapist meant keeping up with current research and understanding it well enough to evaluate it critically and integrate its findings where appropriate.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, I&#8217;ve been noticing another disturbing trend: that is, everyone thinks they need to go to graduate school.\u00a0 I used to get requests for letters of rec from only my outstanding students; in the last years I was at UC Riverside, I had &#8220;C&#8221; students begging me for letters.\u00a0 I warned them that all I could in good conscience write was, &#8220;this person did not fail my class,&#8221; but they were still happy to get it.\u00a0 When questioned,\u00a0many of them\u00a0pointed to the fact that a plain BA in psychology nowadays (in fact, a plain BA in almost anything) was more or less akin to a High School diploma.\u00a0 Everything, they told me, had been bumped\u00a0up one notch:\u00a0whereas you might have been\u00a0conisdered pretty educated in the 1950s if you had an Associate&#8217;s degree, now you can&#8217;t be\u00a0considered &#8220;pretty educated&#8221; unless you have your PhD.\u00a0 This is NOT, I think, the ideal way to encourage people to utilize their strengths\u00a0the most suitable ways.\u00a0 Not everyone is meant for a Master&#8217;s or PhD program (and these programs are also not what everyone needs!).<\/p>\n<p>So now you have people who fled from math, giving short shrift to their\u00a0reserach methods and statistics courses, demanding to go to graduate school despite poor performance, and&#8230; here&#8217;s the last piece&#8230; easily finding someplace to go anyway.\u00a0\u00a0That&#8217;s right &#8211; nowadays, just about anyone can get a MA in psychology &#8211; many schools will take anyone who can pay, and one of their big draws is (you guessed it) they aren&#8217;t very heavy on the empiricism\/quantitative side of psychology.\u00a0 A lot of these schools aren&#8217;t even accredited!\u00a0 But that doesn&#8217;t stop people from getting degrees\u00a0at\u00a0them\u00a0(I just now checked, for example, to find a number of unaccredited universities that will grant\u00a0the Master&#8217;s\u00a0in Psychology <em>online<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>Thank goodness I do not feel this way about the programs at my current institution; smaller and more private though it is, I have seen the director of the brand new PsyD program make every effort to create rigorous admission standards and a rigorous curriculum (just as she has for our clinical master&#8217;s degree program).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Now\u00a0I&#8217;m curious to hear what you think, and whether you think this very same non-science bias occurs (and is rewarded!) in any other discipline?\u00a0 And what do the sociologists have to say about this belief that everyone must have a graduate-level degree lest they be worthless in the job market?\u00a0 Do you believe this trend to be true?\u00a0 In 50 years, will we have to invent a degree that is one step higher than a PhD just to differentiate again??<\/p>\n<p>I love to start a good fight.<\/p>\n<p>Seth<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This recent Newsweek article points to some psychological research that has been causing a bit of an upheaval (click here for the whole 145\u00a0page manuscript\u00a0if you&#8217;re REALLY interested).\u00a0 The gist of it is that one area of the field &#8211; research psychology &#8211; is calling the work of another area\u00a0&#8211; that of therapists and counselors [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":441,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/441"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1947"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1947\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1948,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1947\/revisions\/1948"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/thickculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}