{"id":477,"date":"2013-02-04T15:36:27","date_gmt":"2013-02-04T20:36:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ssn\/?p=477"},"modified":"2013-02-08T11:28:03","modified_gmt":"2013-02-08T16:28:03","slug":"to-help-disadvantaged-children-learn-we-must-acknowledge-that-poverty-hampers-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ssn\/2013\/02\/04\/to-help-disadvantaged-children-learn-we-must-acknowledge-that-poverty-hampers-education\/","title":{"rendered":"To Help Disadvantaged Children Learn, We Must Acknowledge That Poverty Hampers Education"},"content":{"rendered":"

Children from disadvantaged households often do less well in school than their classmates from more economically comfortable backgrounds. Researchers have documented this repeatedly \u2013 in studies of individual children and through comparisons of schools, districts, states, and nations.<\/p>\n

One of every five American children lives in poverty \u2013 more than in most other developed countries. U.S. educators and policymakers thus have every reason to look closely at the educational difficulties poverty creates \u2013 and take active steps to correct the problems. But lately the exact opposite has happened. Disadvantaged schoolchildren are left to fall behind, because reforms like No Child Left Behind pretend that poverty is unimportant.<\/p>\n

Why Does \u201cNo Child Left Behind\u201d Overlook Poverty?<\/h3>\n

The most important federal government initiative in education over the past decade has been \u201cNo Child Left Behind,\u201d a reform intended to prod schools in every state to boost the achievement of all students. Unfortunately, this policy sets the same goals for all students and overlooks the educational difficulties caused by poverty. Every school is required to meet the same proficiency standards, and progress is defined the same way for a middle-class suburban school, a school in a poor inner-city neighborhood, and a school in a struggling rural community.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Photo by Terrapin Flyer via Flickr.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Supporters of No Child Left Behind rationalize ignoring economic disparities in a variety of ways. Some point to the American ideal of education as the road to success for disadvantaged groups. Some believe that schools simply must make up for any problems caused by family circumstances. And still others want teachers to hold the same high expectations for all children. In proposing this reform, President George W. Bush stressed avoiding \u201cthe soft bigotry of low expectations.\u201d But laudable as it may be to hold all schools and teachers accountable for getting good results no matter what, simply wanting something to be possible does not make it possible.<\/p>\n

Those who downplay poverty often point to a few specific schools that have \u201cbeaten the odds.\u201d Operating within the network of the \u201cKnowledge is Power Program,\u201d for example, some charter schools have managed to boost achievement for disadvantaged students. But we cannot assume that if some schools have succeeded, all others can do equally well. Some charter schools have attracted highly motivated students and families from the ranks of the poor, or have enrolled disadvantaged children of higher ability. Moreover, such schools often get extra funding from foundations and employ unusually hardworking teachers. There is no evidence that a few success stories can be scaled up to meet the needs of large numbers of disadvantaged students.<\/p>\n

The Cost of Denial<\/h3>\n

Ignoring the ill effects of poverty on student learning comes at a price. As we are now seeing in states around the country, requiring all schools to meet the same standards for all of their students regardless of family background inevitably leads to shortfalls and undesirable outcomes.<\/p>\n