{"id":73050,"date":"2020-04-22T13:43:17","date_gmt":"2020-04-22T18:43:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=73050"},"modified":"2020-04-22T13:43:19","modified_gmt":"2020-04-22T18:43:19","slug":"partisanship-and-the-pandemic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2020\/04\/22\/partisanship-and-the-pandemic\/","title":{"rendered":"Partisanship and the Pandemic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Can political leaders put partisanship aside to govern in a crisis? The COVID-19 pandemic has proved to be a crucial test of politicians\u2019 willingness to put state before party. Acting swiftly to slow the spread of a novel virus and cooperating with cross-partisans could mean the difference between life and death for many state residents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first confirmed case of the novel coronavirus in the United States was reported in Washington state in January 2020. New cases, including incidents of community spread, continued to be recorded across the country in February. However, <a href=\"https:\/\/time.com\/5805683\/trump-administration-coronavirus\/\">federal-level efforts<\/a> to \u201cflatten the curve\u201d did not begin in force until March. Michigan\u2019s Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer was among the first governors to openly criticize the Trump administration\u2019s slow response. Her criticism led to an open <a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/7845e0d599a0bad6160ade3e6b2a10cf\">partisan feud<\/a> on Twitter between the two leaders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-twitter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Now that I\u2019ve got your attention, Mr. President &#8211; attack tweets won\u2019t solve this crisis. But swift and clear guidance, tests, personal protective equipment, and resources would.  <br><br>FYI &#8211; here\u2019s what I\u2019ve done so far \u2b07\ufe0f <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/LZkN0U490p\">https:\/\/t.co\/LZkN0U490p<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Governor Gretchen Whitmer (@GovWhitmer) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GovWhitmer\/status\/1239919587266826241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">March 17, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In the absence of a national\norder to limit the virus\u2019 spread within the country, state governors took\naction. Leaders in states with some of the earliest-recorded cases \u2013 such as\nWashington, Illinois, and California \u2013 put stay-at-home or shelter-in-place\norders into effect shortly after the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2020\/03\/18\/817965714\/immigration-grinds-to-a-halt-as-president-trump-shuts-borders\">US closed its northern and southern borders<\/a> to non-essential travel. In a matter of weeks,\nmost states\u2019 residents were under similar orders. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Did governors\u2019 decisions to order their states\u2019 residents to hunker down vary by party? In the figure below, I have plotted the date stay-at-home or shelter-in-place orders went into effect (as of April 15, according to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2020\/us\/coronavirus-stay-at-home-order.html\">New York Times<\/a>) by the date of the state\u2019s first reported confirmed case of COVID-19 (according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usnews.com\/news\/best-states\/articles\/2020-03-06\/which-states-have-reported-cases-of-the-coronavirus\">US News &amp; World Report<\/a>). States with Democratic governors are labeled in blue and Republican governors are labeled in red. As of April 15, no statewide stay-home orders had been issued in the Republican-governed states labeled in grey on the plot. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"744\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes-1024x744.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-73051\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes-1024x744.png 1024w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes-500x363.png 500w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes-768x558.png 768w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes-1536x1117.png 1536w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes.png 1560w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Of the 50 states plus\nWashington DC and Puerto Rico, a total of 44 governors have issued stay-at-home\nor shelter-in-place orders. All Democratic-governed states were under similar\norders after Governor Janet Mills called for Maine\u2019s residents to stay home\nbeginning April 2. By contrast, just over two-thirds of states led by\nRepublican executives have mandated residents stay home. Eight states \u2013 all led\nby Republicans \u2013 had not issued such statewide orders as of April 15, 2020.\nStates without stay-at-home orders have had substantial outbreaks of COVID-19,\nincluding in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2020\/04\/14\/834137887\/despite-outbreak-south-dakota-governor-hesitant-to-issue-stay-at-home-order?utm_term=nprnews&amp;utm_source=facebook.com&amp;utm_campaign=npr&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;fbclid=IwAR3m2hY0IPgXfU204l3iApAV37NGpsh2foMtOQrcjE3yN\">South Dakota<\/a> where nearly 450 Smithfield Foods workers were infected in April\ncausing the plant to close indefinitely. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Republican governors have generally been slower to issue restrictions on residents\u2019 non-essential movement. Democrats and Republicans govern an equal number of states and territories on the above plot (26 each). Fifteen Democratic governors had issued statewide stay-home orders by March 26. The fifteenth Republican governor to mandate state residents stay home did not put this order into effect until April 3. This move came after <em>all<\/em> states with Democratic governors had announced similar orders and over two weeks after COVID-19 cases had been confirmed in all states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The median number of days Democratic governors took to mandate their residents to stay home after their state\u2019s first confirmed case was 21 days. By contrast, the median Republican governor took four additional days (25) to restrict residents\u2019 non-essential movement, not accounting for states without stay-home orders as of April 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In short, the timing of\ngovernors\u2019 decisions to mandate #stayhomesavelives appears to be partisan.\nHowever, there are select cases of governors putting public health before party.\nOhio\u2019s Republican Governor Mike DeWine has been heralded as one example. He was\nthe first governor to order all schools to close, an action for which CNN\ndescribed DeWine as the \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2020\/03\/13\/politics\/coronavirus-leadership-mike-dewine-ohio-week-in-review\/index.html\">anti-Trump on coronavirus<\/a>.\u201d These deviations from the norm suggest that\ndivisive partisanship is not inevitable when governing a crisis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/morgancmatthews.weebly.com\/\">Morgan C. Matthews<\/a> is a PhD candidate in sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She studies gender, partisanship, and U.S. political institutions.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Can political leaders put partisanship aside to govern in a crisis? The COVID-19 pandemic has proved to be a crucial test of politicians\u2019 willingness to put state before party. Acting swiftly to slow the spread of a novel virus and cooperating with cross-partisans could mean the difference between life and death for many state residents. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1851,"featured_media":73051,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[16773,252,85],"class_list":["post-73050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-dataviz","tag-healthmedicine","tag-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2020\/04\/Timeplot-of-Governors-Stay-Home-Orders_revised-axes.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1851"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73050"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73050\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73052,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73050\/revisions\/73052"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73051"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}