{"id":71814,"date":"2017-10-19T12:02:31","date_gmt":"2017-10-19T17:02:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=71814"},"modified":"2017-10-19T12:02:31","modified_gmt":"2017-10-19T17:02:31","slug":"2-broke-lab-rats-human-research-subjects-in-film-and-television","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2017\/10\/19\/2-broke-lab-rats-human-research-subjects-in-film-and-television\/","title":{"rendered":"2 Broke Lab Rats: Human Research Subjects in Film and Television"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Human research subjects are all over popular media. Lab rats, guinea pigs, and even the obscure \u201cPharmer\u2019s daughter\u201d (From <em>The Facility,<\/em> 2012) all refer to people who participate in biomedical research as test subjects\u2014often ingesting experimental drugs to test their toxicity or therapeutic effectiveness.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"s1\">The clinical trial industry has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/doug-peddicord\/televisions-assault-on-me_b_1909333.html\">decried the representations of human subjects in the media<\/a> for being fantastical and overly dramatic. The concern is that portraying human subjects in a negative light hurts their ability to recruit participants, test experimental products, and profit from approved drugs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-72045\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2017\/09\/poster1-500x698.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"419\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2017\/09\/poster1-500x698.jpg 500w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2017\/09\/poster1.jpg 716w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>But how are human research subjects actually portrayed?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In two new publications, my co-author Jill Fisher and I look at how human subjects are represented in popular entertainment media. We analyzed 65 television shows and films like <em>Big Bang Theory, Two and a Half Men, Grey\u2019s Anatomy, The Facility<\/em> and <em>The Amazing Spiderman<\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">We find that human research subjects are predominately white men from lower socio-economic backgrounds. When women are represented, they are more likely to be shown being coerced into research (rather than enrolling for therapeutic or financial reasons). <\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-72046\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2017\/09\/poster-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"283\" height=\"159\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">2 Broke Girls is actually an outlier in this regard. In this show, Max and Caroline were not coerced but financially motivated to participate in clinical trials\u2014or as Max likes to call it: \u201cgetting paid $500 to roll the side effect dice and hope it lands on hallucinations! [audience laughter]\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Indeed, films and shows did use fantastical and dramatic representations of side effects\u2014from discussions of men growing breasts, limb regrowth, and fits of rage and violence\u2014and death and injury were common. Most of these medical studies failed\u2014and failed in spectacularly horrific or comedic ways. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">While negative, this portrayal is not necessarily wrong or bad: <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Importantly, negative <i>outcomes <\/i>of fictional medical research are not the same as negative depictions of science\u2026 There are real risks to research participants who enroll in medical studies as well as high rates of scientific failure (Fisher and Cottingham 2017:575\u201376).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\">While industry representatives may dislike portrayals for their inaccuracies, the fact that many <\/span><span class=\"s1\">clinical trials do fail and have serious potential to harm subjects cannot be absolved by painting subjects as \u201cmedical heroes\u201d as some have tried (Peddicord 2012).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>What do human subjects think of these portrayals?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p7\"><span class=\"s1\">We took the study further by looking at how human research subjects themselves use film and television to understand clinical trials. Surprisingly, the discussion of dramatic side effects were common among their responses. As one participant noted:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"p8\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>Like I never heard of this [clinical trials], and \u2018They do what?!\u2019 You know, you gonna grow an extra eye, you gonna grow, you-you know, you hear all these things, you know. &#8211;<\/i> Rob<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"p8\"><span class=\"s1\">And yet, after they had participated in a clinical trial and saw that the more common side effects listed in the informed consent documents included dizziness, headaches, nausea, and fatigue, they became less concerned about the risks of clinical trials. Rather than scaring these participants away, representations in the media seemed to make the mundane and ordinary list of potential side effects (even cardiac issues!) appear even more acceptable. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">We frame media portrayals and participant perspectives on the risks of clinical trials as collective and individual efforts to manage the anxieties surrounding the risks of experimental biomedical research. As a society, we have come to accept the fact that experimental research requires risking human welfare and comfort, but remain ambivalent about the idea that science is inherently good and linked to social progress. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Collectively, we manage this ambivalence by dehumanizing research subjects or indulging in tales of science gone wrong. At the individual level, research participants use media portrayals of \u201clab rats\u201d and \u201cguinea pigs\u201d to manage the fears and anxieties of the research they undergo. No one has grown a third arm, had their penis shrink, or turned blue in a Phase I clinical trial, so it must not be too harmful\u2026right?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Read More Here:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Cottingham, Marci D. and Jill A. Fisher. Forthcoming. \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/13698575.2017.1350638\">From Fantasy to Reality: Managing Biomedical Risk Emotions in and through Fictional Media<\/a>.\u201d <i>Health, Risk &amp; Society<\/i> 1\u201317. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Fisher, Jill A. and Marci D. Cottingham. 2017. \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/pus.sagepub.com\/content\/early\/2016\/04\/04\/0963662516641339.abstract\">This Isn\u2019t Going to End Well: Fictional Representations of Medical Research in Television and Film<\/a>.\u201d <i>Public Understanding of Science<\/i> 26(5):564\u201378. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Peddicord, Doug. 2012. \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/doug-peddicord\/televisions-assault-on-me_b_1909333.html\">Television\u2019s Assault on Medical Research.<\/a>\u201d <i>Huffington Post<\/i>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><em><span class=\"s1\">Marci Cottingham is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Amsterdam. Her research focuses on the sociology of emotion, social inequalities, healthcare, and biomedical risk. More on her research (including the two papers discussed here) can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/uva.academia.edu\/MarciCottingham\">on her website<\/a>.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Human research subjects are all over popular media. Lab rats, guinea pigs, and even the obscure \u201cPharmer\u2019s daughter\u201d (From The Facility, 2012) all refer to people who participate in biomedical research as test subjects\u2014often ingesting experimental drugs to test their toxicity or therapeutic effectiveness. The clinical trial industry has decried the representations of human subjects [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1851,"featured_media":72047,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2017\/09\/poster3.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1851"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71814"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71814\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72044,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71814\/revisions\/72044"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}