{"id":69536,"date":"2016-11-08T10:09:22","date_gmt":"2016-11-08T15:09:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=69536"},"modified":"2016-11-08T12:48:04","modified_gmt":"2016-11-08T17:48:04","slug":"the-radical-fact-of-the-female-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2016\/11\/08\/the-radical-fact-of-the-female-vote\/","title":{"rendered":"The Radical Fact of the Female Vote"},"content":{"rendered":"

No matter which way you voted or who wins, today\u00a0will go down in history as the first time a woman either won or lost the presidency of the United States. Today, in a contemplative mood, I turned back to the chapter on politics I wrote with Myra Marx Ferree\u00a0for our sociology of gender book<\/a>. It’s an ode to the suffragist with a final paragraph that resonates very, very strongly on this day. Read, and let the reverberations of history stir your soul.<\/p>\n

— Lisa<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

In 1848 a small group of American women made the decision to seek suffrage, the right to vote. For most of modern history, governments did not allow women this right, nor the other rights and responsibilities of citizenship\u2014to serve on juries, give legal testimony, or hold public office\u2014and American women were no exception. Many thought the idea was impossible, dangerous, even laughable.\u00a0Opponents mocked suffragists, suggesting that giving women the vote was as ridiculous as giving it to housecats<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"4\"<\/p>\n

The fight for suffrage was not won quickly or easily and many suffragists died of old age before they could see their efforts realized. In addition to ridicule, suffragists faced government repression and violence. Most suffragists were peaceful, but some weren\u2019t above aggression themselves. One group in the United Kingdom set buildings on fire<\/a> and learned jujitsu<\/a> to defend themselves from the police. Over 1,000 suffragists would be imprisoned in the United Kingdom and United States. There they endured brutal force-feeding<\/a> after initiating hunger strikes that endangered their lives.<\/p>\n

The fight for suffrage involved both inspiring coalitions and ugly divides. Many suffragists were abolitionists first, activists in the fight against human slavery. White and black men and women worked side-by-side for this hard-won victory. After slavery was abolished in 1865 and black men were granted suffrage in 1869, black women continued to fight valiantly for their own vote. As abolitionist Sojourner Truth observed<\/a>: \u201cIf colored men get their rights, and colored women not theirs, the colored men will be masters over the women, and it will be just as bad as it was before.\u201d<\/p>\n

White suffragists often disagreed<\/a> on whether their efforts should benefit all women or only white women. Anti-suffrage activists tapped into widespread animosity toward black people, reminding a racist public that women\u2019s suffrage would not only put women into the voting booth, it would double the black vote. Some suffragist groups were themselves racist, excluding black women from their organizations, activities, or platform. Many black women started suffrage organizations of their own.<\/p>\n

Eventually, suffragists began making alliances with women in other countries. By the early 1900s, this international women\u2019s organizing had begun to shift public opinion in their favor. Finland and New Zealand were the first to grant women the right to vote in the 1910s. The United States came around in 1920, giving suffrage to both black and white women together. By then the movement was rolling across the globe. In less than thirty years, women\u2019s suffrage became a global norm<\/a>. The last state to disallow women’s voting, Saudi Arabia, allowed them to vote in 2015.<\/p>\n

Today universal suffrage, the right of all citizens to vote, is the very definition of democracy. This right is taken for granted today, so much so that many people don\u2019t even know the word anymore. In the 1800s, however, it was a wholly radical claim<\/a>, defined as an idea that doesn\u2019t (yet) resonate with most members of a population. In fact, it was a massively important step toward dismantling political systems that recognized some people as full citizens but not others. It was also extraordinarily disruptive to the social order and the distribution of power. It is a testament to the fact that, even when social conditions are stubbornly entrenched and defended by powerful people, change\u2014even radical change\u2014is possible.<\/p>\n

Lisa Wade, PhD<\/a> is a professor at Occidental College. She is the author of <\/em>American Hookup<\/a>, a book about college sexual culture, and a textbook about gender<\/a>. You can follow her on Twitter<\/a>, Facebook<\/a>, and Instagram<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Myra Marx Ferree, PhD<\/a> is a professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is the recipient of numerous prizes for contributions to gender studies and does research on global gender politics. Among her many books is a textbook on the sociology of gender<\/a> , with Lisa Wade.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

No matter which way you voted or who wins, today\u00a0will go down in history as the first time a woman either won or lost the presidency of the United States. Today, in a contemplative mood, I turned back to the chapter on politics I wrote with Myra Marx Ferree\u00a0for our sociology of gender book. It’s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":51,"featured_media":69541,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12508,55,2095,2102,2094,23680,23679,253,778,23695,3920,234,20068,461,304,868,285,23665],"class_list":["post-69536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-activismsocial-movements","tag-gender","tag-gender-feminismactivism","tag-gender-history","tag-gender-politics","tag-gender-sexism","tag-gender-subordination","tag-history","tag-intersectionality","tag-intersectionality-gender-x-race","tag-nation-united-states","tag-democracy","tag-politics-election-2016","tag-human-rights","tag-the-state","tag-power","tag-raceethnicity","tag-raceethnicity-history"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2016\/11\/4-2.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69536"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69536\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":69545,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69536\/revisions\/69545"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69541"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}