{"id":57288,"date":"2013-10-09T12:00:07","date_gmt":"2013-10-09T17:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=57288"},"modified":"2014-06-09T21:05:27","modified_gmt":"2014-06-10T02:05:27","slug":"why-do-we-sexualize-chicken","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2013\/10\/09\/why-do-we-sexualize-chicken\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Do We Sexualize Chicken?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Sexual Politics of Meat<\/a><\/em> is a scathing, powerful analysis of the relationship between the oppression of women and the farming of animals for food. \u00a0Written by Carol J. Adams<\/a> and published in 1990, it inspired many a feminist to choose vegetarianism and made many more take pause.<\/p>\n

In the six-and-a-half minute video below, she discusses the sexualization and feminization of chicken specifically. \u00a0She shows lots of examples of the ways in which chicken carcasses are objectified as women: put in high heels, bikinis, sexual positions, etc. \u00a0We feature many examples of this at our Pinterest board collecting gendered and sexualized food<\/a>, some of which we’ve borrowed from Adams.<\/p>\n

\"1\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Adams then argues that this is a way to distract us from the fact that we are eating the flesh of an animal that has been killed for us.\u00a0She writes:<\/p>\n

By sexualizing animals, we trigger another thing, that uneasiness becomes sexual energy… and everybody knows what to do about sexual energy. \u00a0You can laugh at it, you can talk about it, it reduces whoever is presented to an object. \u00a0And so it makes it okay again.<\/p>\n

So the sexualization of animals enters into and participates in the wider issue of “Why are we doing this to animals?” \u00a0Oh yeah, because it’s funny, because it’s fun, because we can have fun with it. And it takes the ethical out.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Moreover, presenting chicken as dressing up for the male gaze suggests that the animal wants<\/em> to be consumed. \u00a0The animal appears to desire to inspire (culinary) lust and, accordingly, it’s okay if you eat her. \u00a0This works best alongside feminization, as it is women who are typically presented as objects of a lustful male gaze.<\/p>\n

\"Screenshot_1\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Bonus: Fifty Shades of Grey<\/em> makes an appearance, and not incidentally. \u00a0 In response to its popularity, a book was published called Fifty Shades of Chicken<\/em>. \u00a0Here’s the book trailer:<\/p>\n

<\/object><\/p>\n

Adams call Grey<\/em>\u00a0a “regressive book that implied that despite all the advances feminism has made, women really just wanted to be in bondage.” \u00a0In both books, she argues, we’re seeing the “packaging and sexualizing [of] dominance over another being.”<\/p>\n

Hear it straight from Adams, via Uncooped<\/a>:<\/p>\n