{"id":34601,"date":"2011-03-21T07:23:23","date_gmt":"2011-03-21T12:23:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=34601"},"modified":"2013-11-14T04:18:22","modified_gmt":"2013-11-14T09:18:22","slug":"the-pitfalls-of-marketing-race-and-beauty-in-a-dove-ad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2011\/03\/21\/the-pitfalls-of-marketing-race-and-beauty-in-a-dove-ad\/","title":{"rendered":"The Pitfalls of Marketing: Race and Beauty in a Dove Ad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Amy H. sent in a Dove ad from <em>O<\/em> magazine. The ad clearly means to say that women get &#8220;visibly more beautiful skin&#8221; because their body wash moisturizes dry skin. However, the placement of the women in front of the &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;after&#8221; text may unfortunately, based on a quick glance, inadvertently convey a different message:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2011\/03\/dove.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-34604 aligncenter\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2011\/03\/dove-798x1024.jpg\" width=\"497\" height=\"637\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2011\/03\/dove-798x1024.jpg 798w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2011\/03\/dove-390x500.jpg 390w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2011\/03\/dove.jpg 1103w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 497px) 100vw, 497px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I continue to be puzzled that multinational corporations with resources for large-scale marketing campaigns so often stumble in awkward ways when trying to include a range of racial\/ethnic groups in their materials. This seems to occur by not sufficiently taking into account existing or historical cultural representations that may provide a background for the interpretation of images or phrases in the advertising. In this case, the arrangement of the models combined with the text above and below them unfortunately intersects with a cultural history in which White skin was seen as inherently &#8220;more beautiful&#8221; than non-White skin (not to mention thinner bodies as more beautiful than larger ones).<\/p>\n<p>It would be possible to make this same ad, using these same models and basic idea, in a way that avoided any potential misinterpretation &#8212; all it would take, I think, would be to take the before-and-after pics and make them small off-set images on the side, so &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;after&#8221; couldn&#8217;t be read as referring to the women&#8217;s bodies. Given that advertising materials are often highly scrutinized, Photoshopped, market tested, and focus grouped, I can&#8217;t quite figure out how potentially problematic racial\/ethnic connotations aren&#8217;t caught before such ads are released.<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPDATE:<\/strong> In my analysis, I gave Dove the benefit of the doubt in assuming this was a non-intentional aspect of the ad, largely because even in the &#8220;best case scenario&#8221; where this is entirely unintended, it is problematic. However, several readers suggest that we shouldn&#8217;t too quickly assume that instances such as these are accidental.<\/p>\n<span class=\"ft_signature\"><em>Gwen Sharp is an associate professor of sociology at Nevada State College. You can follow her on Twitter at @gwensharpnv.<\/em><\/span>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amy H. sent in a Dove ad from O magazine. The ad clearly means to say that women get &#8220;visibly more beautiful skin&#8221; because their body wash moisturizes dry skin. However, the placement of the women in front of the &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;after&#8221; text may unfortunately, based on a quick glance, inadvertently convey a different [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[218,23703,285,1760,1757],"class_list":["post-34601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bodies","tag-marketing","tag-raceethnicity","tag-raceethnicity-blacksafricans","tag-raceethnicity-whiteseuropeans"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34601"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59013,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34601\/revisions\/59013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}