{"id":28353,"date":"2010-10-23T13:44:53","date_gmt":"2010-10-23T18:44:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=28353"},"modified":"2010-10-23T11:10:50","modified_gmt":"2010-10-23T16:10:50","slug":"independent-expenditures-on-political-ads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2010\/10\/23\/independent-expenditures-on-political-ads\/","title":{"rendered":"Independent Expenditures on Political Ads"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit group interested in government transparency, has a couple of charts that reflect the <a href=\"http:\/\/reporting.sunlightfoundation.com\/2010\/outside-spending-hits-200-million-mark\/\" target=\"_blank\">enormous growth in spending by outside groups<\/a> (i.e., organizations other than the parties or the candidates themselves):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>According to data obtained from the Federal Election Commission,  fifty-nine percent of all outside spending on independent expenditures  has come from non-party aligned groups while only forty-one percent  comes from the party committees. This is a dramatic change from the 2006  midterms (as of October 19, 2006) when party committees accounted for  eighty-two percent of all outside spending on independent expenditures  and non-party aligned committees accounted for eighteen percent.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This includes those that actively support or oppose a candidate and advocate voting in a particular way; it isn&#8217;t counting the independent &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/blog.sunlightfoundation.com\/2010\/10\/01\/16913\/\" target=\"_blank\">electioneering communications<\/a>,&#8221; where groups take a clear stance toward a candidate&#8217;s policies but don&#8217;t explicitly say to vote for or against them.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the breakdown of spending from 2006:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/Screen-shot-2010-10-14-at-4.29.15-PM.png\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-28354 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/Screen-shot-2010-10-14-at-4.29.15-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>And 2010:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/Screen-shot-2010-10-14-at-4.32.44-PM.png\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-1\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-28355 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/Screen-shot-2010-10-14-at-4.32.44-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"299\" height=\"224\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Of course, the major cause for this was the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee<\/em>. The decision allows outside groups to spend unlimited amounts and to actively take positions in ads, as long as they don&#8217;t specifically advocate voting for or against candidates and don&#8217;t coordinate with campaigns. They also are not required to disclose their donors.<\/p>\n<p>Both Democrats and Republicans receive support from such groups, though Republicans benefit more thus far. For a breakdown of specific types of spending (including both independent spending and electioneering communications), the Sunlight Foundation has a great database <a href=\"http:\/\/reporting.sunlightfoundation.com\/independent-expenditures\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit group interested in government transparency, has a couple of charts that reflect the enormous growth in spending by outside groups (i.e., organizations other than the parties or the candidates themselves): According to data obtained from the Federal Election Commission, fifty-nine percent of all outside spending on independent expenditures has come [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[85],"class_list":["post-28353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28353"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28359,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28353\/revisions\/28359"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}