{"id":28046,"date":"2010-10-08T15:42:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-08T20:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=28046"},"modified":"2011-11-25T17:28:05","modified_gmt":"2011-11-25T22:28:05","slug":"ok-youre-powerful-but-are-you-married","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2010\/10\/08\/ok-youre-powerful-but-are-you-married\/","title":{"rendered":"OK, You&#8217;re Powerful; But Are You MARRIED?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dmitriy T.M. pointed out a post at <a href=\"http:\/\/jezebel.com\/5658089\/forbes-informs-us-which-power-women-are-single?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+jezebel\/full+%28Jezebel%29\" target=\"_blank\">Jezebel<\/a> about an odd aspect of the <em>Forbes<\/em> &#8220;Power Women&#8221; list. Forbes has a general list of the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/2009\/11\/11\/worlds-most-powerful-leadership-power-09-people_land.html\" target=\"_blank\">world&#8217;s most powerful people<\/a>&#8221; (with 67 entrants, 3 of whom are women), as well as one specifically of the world&#8217;s 100 most powerful women. Here&#8217;s a sample bio from the general list, which is representative of what they all look like (I didn&#8217;t include the paragraph below each photo that explains why they&#8217;re powerful):<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/forbesmen1.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-28047 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/forbesmen1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"413\" height=\"404\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Now let&#8217;s check out a profile from the powerful women list:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/forbeswomen1.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-1\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-28048 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/forbeswomen1-500x294.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"294\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/forbeswomen1-500x294.jpg 500w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2010\/10\/forbeswomen1.jpg 590w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Notice the difference? Almost all of the women&#8217;s profiles, but none of the profiles on the &#8220;general&#8221; power list, include their marital status (84 do, 16 don&#8217;t), and many list how many children they have. It&#8217;s fairly common to have a woman listed as married but without any comment about children; I could only find one (Ana Patricia Botin, #38) where she is listed as having children but her marital status isn&#8217;t provided, and none who were listed as single (as opposed to married, divorced, or widowed) but having children. (Also, Jenny Goudreau wrote an article about <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.forbes.com\/jennagoudreau\/2010\/10\/06\/diversity-on-the-forbes-power-women-list-michelle-obama-oprah-winfrey\/\" target=\"_blank\">diversity on the list<\/a> that&#8217;s rather interesting.)<\/p>\n<p>To be fair, on some occasions <em>Forbes<\/em> has included marital\/parental information on lists that are dominated by men. Why they didn&#8217;t decide to be consistent here, I don&#8217;t know. The inconsistency in this case leaves the unfortunate impression that <em>Forbes<\/em> is endorsing the tendency to see powerful men are individually interesting, while still judging powerful women by their family roles.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dmitriy T.M. pointed out a post at Jezebel about an odd aspect of the Forbes &#8220;Power Women&#8221; list. Forbes has a general list of the &#8220;world&#8217;s most powerful people&#8221; (with 67 entrants, 3 of whom are women), as well as one specifically of the world&#8217;s 100 most powerful women. Here&#8217;s a sample bio from the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[36,55,2096,2088,2087,85],"class_list":["post-28046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-economics","tag-gender","tag-gender-femininity","tag-gender-marriagefamily","tag-gender-masculinity","tag-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28046"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42358,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28046\/revisions\/42358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}