{"id":2426,"date":"2008-09-04T22:45:37","date_gmt":"2008-09-05T03:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=2426"},"modified":"2017-09-16T16:24:08","modified_gmt":"2017-09-16T21:24:08","slug":"privilege-and-poverty-in-vogue-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2008\/09\/04\/privilege-and-poverty-in-vogue-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Privilege and Poverty in Vogue India"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abby K. sent me a link to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/09\/01\/business\/worldbusiness\/01vogue.html?_r=1&amp;ei=5070&amp;emc=eta1&amp;oref=slogin\">this <em>New York Times<\/em> article<\/a> about the August issue of <em>Vogue India<\/em>. The issue has sparked controversy because of a fashion spread that shows poor Indians modeling extremely expensive brand-name accessories, such as this child modeling a Fendi bib that costs around $100 while being held by a woman prominently missing teeth:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2008\/09\/01vogue01_500.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2424 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2008\/09\/01vogue01_500.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"375\" height=\"500\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Or this one of a barefoot man, also missing teeth, holding a Burberry umbrella that costs about $200:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2008\/09\/01vogue02_650.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-1\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2425 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/files\/2008\/09\/01vogue02_650.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"332\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>From the article:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Vogue India editor Priya Tanna\u2019s message to critics of the August shoot: \u201cLighten up,\u201d she said in a telephone interview. Vogue is about realizing the \u201cpower of fashion\u201d she said, and the shoot was saying that \u201cfashion is no longer a rich man\u2019s privilege. Anyone can carry it off and make it look beautiful,\u201d she said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure where to even begin with this one. The objectification of the poor, who are used as props in a fashion magazine aimed at people very different from them? The oblivious discussion of the &#8220;power of fashion,&#8221; while ignoring the issue of how much these luxury items cost relative to average incomes in India? I&#8217;m especially struck by the way that the inability to spend $200 on an umbrella is no longer seen as a privilege because &#8220;anyone&#8221; can &#8220;carry it off&#8221;; it&#8217;s not about having $200 extra dollars, it&#8217;s about having the mindset to know you can carry these items and won&#8217;t make them look ugly or tacky, apparently. There&#8217;s a complete denial of privilege and power having anything to do with wealth,\u00a0 social stratification, or any inequality more consequential than some people maybe worrying that they won&#8217;t &#8220;make&#8221; fashion &#8220;look beautiful&#8221; (which in and of itself is an interesting idea&#8211;it&#8217;s not whether the fashion items make <em>you<\/em> look beautiful, it&#8217;s what you do for <em>them<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<span class=\"ft_signature\"><em>Gwen Sharp is an associate professor of sociology at Nevada State College. You can follow her on Twitter at @gwensharpnv.<\/em><\/span>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abby K. sent me a link to this New York Times article about the August issue of Vogue India. The issue has sparked controversy because of a fashion spread that shows poor Indians modeling extremely expensive brand-name accessories, such as this child modeling a Fendi bib that costs around $100 while being held by a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[279,29,225,23384,1784],"class_list":["post-2426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-objectification","tag-class","tag-clothesfashion","tag-social-construction-discourselanguage","tag-nation-india"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2426"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70838,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2426\/revisions\/70838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}