{"id":14664,"date":"2009-10-26T10:52:35","date_gmt":"2009-10-26T15:52:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/?p=14664"},"modified":"2011-08-08T02:18:26","modified_gmt":"2011-08-08T07:18:26","slug":"guest-post-are-we-still-saying-that-because-we-should-stop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2009\/10\/26\/guest-post-are-we-still-saying-that-because-we-should-stop\/","title":{"rendered":"Are We Still Saying That? Because We Should Stop."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While I was doing my post-grad work in Economics (capitalizing that word feels  like such a joke), and even well before then, the academics in the know never  tired of mentioning that We, as a collective of thinkers and activists, had  ceased to use the expression <span style=\"font-weight: bold;font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span>. Instead, we  talked about developing nations, or less\/least developed countries, a move to  which I wholly subscribed, because although I feel quite alone in this, <span style=\"font-weight: bold\">I detest the phrase<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_5s33oD86t0A\/SsuHwatIelI\/AAAAAAAAAgM\/Hrs4LoYDZwQ\/s1600-h\/150.png\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"margin: 0px auto 10px;width: 320px;cursor: pointer;height: 186px;text-align: center\" src=\"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_5s33oD86t0A\/SsuHwatIelI\/AAAAAAAAAgM\/Hrs4LoYDZwQ\/s320\/150.png\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">But all of a sudden, everywhere I look, I see it springing up  again. And I&#8217;m starting to wonder whether I only dreamt the popular rejection of  the term years ago, or whether it&#8217;s enjoying some kind of rebirth. It certainly  hasn&#8217;t been redefined: it&#8217;s a handy little moniker that encapsulates any brand  of nastiness or degradation you might imagine, and it&#8217;s quite the punchline.  Hate the state in which your office bathrooms are kept? Liken it to a <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span> country. Annoyed that your hotel  only offers three varieties of cream cheese at breakfast? Call it a <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span> diet. It&#8217;s an exaggeration, see?  So it&#8217;s funny! Lawl and stuff!<\/p>\n<p>Implicit in these comparisons is the  realization that the speakers not only have no idea about the reality of life in  the so-called <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span>, but further,  don&#8217;t give a crap. They&#8217;re able to so flippantly refer to the poverty and lack  of opportunity in some of these nations because they&#8217;re comfortable &#8211; not with  the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">actual<\/span> state of things, of which  they have only a vague knowledge, or none &#8211; but with the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">fabled<\/span> state of things. Starvation, disease  and war existing on such a scale for such a length of time need not be treated  with any reverence or respect, one, because it is completely removed from their  lives and doesn&#8217;t affect them, and two, because some of the countries of the  global South have, in the estimation of these speakers, become horror stories in  themselves, and thus have transitioned into some kind of mythical status.  Except, we&#8217;re not talking about centaurs and unicorns here. We&#8217;re talking about  real, live, accessible people&#8217;s lives, of which, if someone can hit Enter on a  keyboard, they can approach some basic understanding.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the term  <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span> obscures all parts of a  country&#8217;s culture apart from those which are to be pitied or improved. By no  great coincidence, so does the mainstream media. Back in March, I highlighted  the efforts of <a href=\"http:\/\/mongoosechronicles.blogspot.com\/2009\/03\/across-africa.html\">Chioma  and Oluchi Ogwuegbu<\/a>: two Nigerian sisters who had purposed to tell the story  of the Africa behind all that media footage of distended bellies and  power-hungry rebels. It&#8217;s not that a discussion of the problems of developing  nations is not needed. It is. But when you commit to systematically representing  a country solely as victims, you show only one part of who its people are, and  not the greatest part. <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Third World<\/span> also  implies homogeneity across all the countries that are meant to comprise this  class, one which simply does not exist economically, socially or politically. It  suggests that regardless of level of economic and social development,  comparative advantages or system of governance, they are all to be singularly  treated always as less than.<\/p>\n<p>And the final issue I have with this term is  perhaps the most obvious: it suggests a hierarchy that in people&#8217;s minds is not  neatly restricted to some ranking of progress in development indicators, and  certainly not to the historical allegiance of nations during the Cold War, as  its origins are claimed to be, but is attached to real people and by  association, their ethnicities. It suggests that the US with its White majority  is <span style=\"font-style: italic\">innately<\/span> better than, say, India, and  encourages not an examination of global inequality as a result of historical  exploitation, but of the notion that these countries have less because they are  objectively worth less. And that was its intent. When Frenchman Alfred Sauvy  coined the term half a century ago, he was so inspired to do by the presence of  the Third Estate in France, the commoners who, by virtue of their position,  Sauvy thought destined to be in an eternal state of revolution against the  higher classes of the First and Second Estates. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic\">Like the third estate,<\/span>&#8221; he famously wrote,  &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic\">the Third World has nothing, and wants to be  something.<\/span>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Leaders at the Bandung Conference that followed in  1955 embraced the designation as an indication of a new bloc, but that  designation, tenuous even then, means nothing now. And anyone from a developing  country who wants to reclaim the expression can, I suppose, go ahead and do so.  I choose not to. I, as a Black woman from the Caribbean, am third in no one&#8217;s  pecking order. This is not sensitivity to a useful academic category or  definition &#8211; although even those types of objections often have merit. This is  the thorough rejection of a highly stigmatized, completely arbitrary  categorization that serves no purpose other than to equate a certain  geographical provenance and ethnic heritage with lack and degradation.<\/p>\n<p>I  do not accept it, and I would encourage allies of we who originate, live and  work on human rights and development in the global South to also reject it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Marsha blogs at\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/mongoosechronicles.blogspot.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Mongoose Chronicles<\/a>. About herself, she says:\u00a0 Rogue economist escaped to the bright side. Writer, talker, dancer, songwriter, singer, walker, runner, roamer, cook. Fierce lover of family and friends. Lover and defender of my womanness, Africanness, my Caribbean heritage, my Barbados, my right to take up my space and protect our space.<\/p>\n<p>If you would like to write a post for Sociological Images, please see our\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/2007\/07\/21\/instructions-for-guest-bloggers\/\" target=\"_self\">Guidelines for Guest Bloggers<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While I was doing my post-grad work in Economics (capitalizing that word feels like such a joke), and even well before then, the academics in the know never tired of mentioning that We, as a collective of thinkers and activists, had ceased to use the expression Third World. Instead, we talked about developing nations, or [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":51,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[23384,36,64,85],"class_list":["post-14664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-social-construction-discourselanguage","tag-economics","tag-globalization","tag-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14664"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14664\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38425,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14664\/revisions\/38425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/socimages\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}