{"id":406,"date":"2008-04-15T22:54:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-16T04:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/2008\/04\/15\/a-practice-called-ghostwriting\/"},"modified":"2008-04-15T22:54:00","modified_gmt":"2008-04-16T04:54:00","slug":"a-practice-called-ghostwriting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/2008\/04\/15\/a-practice-called-ghostwriting\/","title":{"rendered":"a practice called ghostwriting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/files\/blogger_import\/307-shill.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5189635242815989250\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/files\/blogger_import\/308-shill.jpg\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/biz.yahoo.com\/ap\/080415\/drug_research_conflicts.html\">yahoo\/ap<\/a> reports today on a strongly-worded JAMA piece on <a href=\"http:\/\/jama.ama-assn.org\/cgi\/content\/full\/299\/15\/1800\"><em>guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>from lindsey tanner&#8217;s associated press article:<\/p>\n<p>CHICAGO (AP) &#8212; Two new reports involving the painkiller Vioxx raise fresh concerns about how drug companies influence the interpretation and publication of medical research.<\/p>\n<p>The reports claim Merck &amp; Co. frequently paid academic scientists to take credit for research articles prepared by company-hired medical writers, a practice called ghostwriting&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>the story gets better, but i&#8217;m stuck on the idea that the &#8220;academic scientists&#8221; are literally selling their names and the credibility of their institutions &#8212; and that the results are published in respectable journals. while authorship norms vary greatly by discipline and department, i always figured that the putative authors were the ones paying the ghostwriters.<\/p>\n<p>although big pharma wouldn&#8217;t care to tempt me, i can envision such a scenario arising in my field of study. let&#8217;s say i get a grant from <em>privateprisonco <\/em>to fund my next recidivism study. they hire criminological ghostwriters from the firm of <em>shill &amp; hack <\/em>to write a manuscript comparing the recidivism of <em>privateprisonco <\/em>releasees with that of a matched comparison group of <em>statepen <\/em>releasees. they give me first authorship and $500 for my trouble, in exchange for whatever credibility attaches to my name and institution.<\/p>\n<p>the full <a href=\"http:\/\/jama.ama-assn.org\/cgi\/content\/full\/299\/15\/1800\">JAMA<\/a> piece is well-documented, though merck is challenging the article and its pointed conclusion:<\/p>\n<p>Authors who &#8220;sign-off&#8221; on or &#8220;edit&#8221; original manuscripts or reviews written explicitly by pharmaceutical industry employees or by medical publishing companies should offer full authorship disclosure, such as, &#8220;drafting of the manuscript was done by representatives from XYZ, Inc; the authors were responsible for critical revisions of the manuscript for important intellectual content.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>yahoo\/ap reports today on a strongly-worded JAMA piece on guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib. from lindsey tanner&#8217;s associated press article: CHICAGO (AP) &#8212; Two new reports involving the painkiller Vioxx raise fresh concerns about how drug companies influence the interpretation and publication of medical research. The reports claim Merck &amp; Co. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}