{"id":206,"date":"2007-03-01T22:58:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-02T04:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/2007\/03\/01\/criminal-anagrams-from-a-hog-sprung-heretic\/"},"modified":"2008-03-07T13:09:20","modified_gmt":"2008-03-07T19:09:20","slug":"criminal-anagrams-from-a-hog-sprung-heretic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/2007\/03\/01\/criminal-anagrams-from-a-hog-sprung-heretic\/","title":{"rendered":"criminal anagrams from a hog-sprung heretic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/files\/blogger_import\/516-jumble.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5037155848671496754\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/files\/blogger_import\/517-jumble.jpg\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\" \/><\/a>i enjoy playing with anagrams, rearranging my kids&#8217; names to fit some aspect of their personalities. for example, <em>tor stanley uggen<\/em> has the same letters as both <em>gentle guy on star <\/em>and <em>let&#8217;s not anger guy. <\/em>yeah, that sounds about right.<\/p>\n<p>it won&#8217;t surprise my students to learn that <em>christopher uggen<\/em> is actually code for <em>hog-sprung heretic<\/em>, and, given my minnesota biases, <em>gopher guts enrich<\/em>. wondering whether similar magic applies for the sociological criminologists i&#8217;ve been teaching in my delinquency class this year, i came up with the following variations without too much trouble. i&#8217;m self-censoring here, because some of the really funny ones seemed too cruel or unfair. i trust you can figure them out on your own, if so inclined.<\/p>\n<p>let&#8217;s start with the classics. <em>cesare lombroso <\/em>whose <em>criminal man <\/em>connected primitive features with criminality in 1870, can be nicely anagramed into <em>a slob score more. <\/em>hmm. that rather nicely sums up atavistic theory, doesn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n<p>it is tougher to reconcile clifford shaw&#8217;s great work with his name. somehow <em>scaffold whir<\/em> or <em>lads chow riff<\/em> fail to capture the essence of social disorganization theory. how about my intellectual great grandfather, learning theorist edwin a. sutherland? it pains me to say so, but his critics might view <em>he did learn, was nut<\/em> or, more charitably, <em>he did learn, aw nuts <\/em>as all-too-appropriate alternative monikers.<\/p>\n<p>speaking of professor sutherland&#8217;s critics, i couldn&#8217;t do much with social control theory&#8217;s travis hirschi (<em>stir a rich shiv<\/em> or <em>chris ravish it<\/em>) or anomie&#8217;s <em>robert k. merton <\/em>(<em>torment broker<\/em> and <em>broken term rot <\/em>are a little better). i had better luck with howard s. becker, who wrote a classic on marijuana use <em>(saw herb rocked<\/em> or <em>sacred herb wok<\/em>) and offered insightful critiques of mainstream sociology (<em>bored whackers<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>this week my students are reading <em>meda chesney-lind <\/em>on feminist criminology and juvenile Justice, so her new moniker (<em>she demand nicely<\/em>) might seem fitting. i couldn&#8217;t work the &#8220;q&#8221; into <em>james q. wilson, <\/em>but the brilliant conservative who wrote <em>thinking about crime <\/em>can otherwise be cruelly rearranged as <em>jowls is mean. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>ok, that&#8217;s where i draw the line. in fairness, i should also note that christopher uggen can be cruelly rearranged as <em>pure hogs retching. <\/em>though my personal anagrams can&#8217;t rival, say, <em>mr. mojo risin\u2019, <\/em>i guess i&#8217;d prefer <em>hog-sprung heretic <\/em>to <em>pure hogs retching. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>i enjoy playing with anagrams, rearranging my kids&#8217; names to fit some aspect of their personalities. for example, tor stanley uggen has the same letters as both gentle guy on star and let&#8217;s not anger guy. yeah, that sounds about right. it won&#8217;t surprise my students to learn that christopher uggen is actually code for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-teaching"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}