{"id":1704,"date":"2013-03-08T16:39:33","date_gmt":"2013-03-08T22:39:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/?p=1704"},"modified":"2014-02-12T11:42:11","modified_gmt":"2014-02-12T17:42:11","slug":"two-ways-to-reduce-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/2013\/03\/08\/two-ways-to-reduce-crime\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Ways to Reduce Crime"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"OLYMPUS<\/a>We all want lower crime rates, but\u00a0“how we get there” matters. Rick Rosenfeld and Steve Messner see two basic approaches: (1) we can lock down criminal opportunities through surveillance and control; or, (2) we can reduce criminal motivations by building up the social safety net. Their new\u00a0Social Welfare Critique of Contemporary Crime Control<\/a>\u00a0makes a strong case for the latter approach.<\/p>\n

The argument is based less on the relative efficacy or efficiency of these approaches than on our collective vision of the society we’d like to inhabit. Further reducing criminal opportunities will place increasingly onerous restrictions on freedom of movement, association, and other liberties — and further extend the disciplinary practices of the prison to public life.<\/p>\n

Consistent with their institutional arguments in Crime and the American Dream<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>and elsewhere, Professors\u00a0Rosenfeld and Messner argue that a more robust welfare state can help\u00a0compensate for the weaknesses of a market economy in promoting and sustaining a viable moral order. They recognize that any (reality-based) crime policy must limit criminal opportunities, but the challenge is to enhance public safety without sacrificing individual liberties and democratic values. \u00a0On this count, “welfare state” policies to reduce criminal motivations have much to recommend them over “security state” \u00a0policies to lock down opportunities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We all want lower crime rates, but\u00a0“how we get there” matters. Rick Rosenfeld and Steve Messner see two basic approaches: (1) we can lock down criminal opportunities through surveillance and control; or, (2) we can reduce criminal motivations by building up the social safety net. Their new\u00a0Social Welfare Critique of Contemporary Crime Control\u00a0makes a strong […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[124],"class_list":["post-1704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-crime"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1704"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1861,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704\/revisions\/1861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/pubcrim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}