{"id":154,"date":"2015-06-04T17:22:05","date_gmt":"2015-06-04T22:22:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/?p=154"},"modified":"2017-06-29T10:34:17","modified_gmt":"2017-06-29T15:34:17","slug":"chris-uggen-on-academic-dishonesty-and-public-sociology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/2015\/06\/04\/chris-uggen-on-academic-dishonesty-and-public-sociology\/","title":{"rendered":"Chris Uggen on Academic Dishonesty and Public Sociology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this special edition of <em>Give Methods a Chance<\/em>, we talk with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.soc.umn.edu\/~uggen\/\">Chris Uggen<\/a> to get context and insight to a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/content\/early\/2015\/05\/27\/science.aac6638\">retraction of a political science article in\u00a0<em>Science<\/em><\/a>\u00a0and the resulting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/05\/29\/science\/journal-science-retracts-study-on-gay-canvassers-and-same-sex-marriage.html?_r=0\">public discourse<\/a> around the study under question.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Outright fraud, where people make up data, is likely to be exceedingly rare&#8211;in part because it is not sustainable over a long term. As academics, we rely on our professional reputation. So you might be able to get a paper published, which might even get you a job, but, long term, it just isn&#8217;t in anyone&#8217;s interest to falsify data.&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8211; Chris Uggen &#8211;\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"powerpress_player\" id=\"powerpress_player_2439\"><!--[if lt IE 9]><script>document.createElement('audio');<\/script><![endif]-->\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-154-1\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/files.thesocietypages.org\/downloads\/GMAC14_Uggen_on_Academic_Dishonesty_and_Public_Sociology.mp3?_=1\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/files.thesocietypages.org\/downloads\/GMAC14_Uggen_on_Academic_Dishonesty_and_Public_Sociology.mp3\">http:\/\/files.thesocietypages.org\/downloads\/GMAC14_Uggen_on_Academic_Dishonesty_and_Public_Sociology.mp3<\/a><\/audio><\/div><p class=\"powerpress_links powerpress_links_mp3\">Podcast: <a href=\"http:\/\/files.thesocietypages.org\/downloads\/GMAC14_Uggen_on_Academic_Dishonesty_and_Public_Sociology.mp3\" class=\"powerpress_link_pinw\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Play in new window\" onclick=\"return powerpress_pinw('https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/?powerpress_pinw=154-podcast');\" rel=\"nofollow\">Play in new window<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/files.thesocietypages.org\/downloads\/GMAC14_Uggen_on_Academic_Dishonesty_and_Public_Sociology.mp3\" class=\"powerpress_link_d\" title=\"Download\" rel=\"nofollow\" download=\"GMAC14_Uggen_on_Academic_Dishonesty_and_Public_Sociology.mp3\">Download<\/a><\/p><!--powerpress_player-->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this special edition of Give Methods a Chance, we talk with Chris Uggen to get context and insight to a recent retraction of a political science article in\u00a0Science\u00a0and the resulting public discourse around the study under question. &#8220;Outright fraud, where people make up data, is likely to be exceedingly rare&#8211;in part because it is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":333,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34732],"tags":[39,34718,26],"class_list":["post-154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-methodological-innovations","tag-ethics","tag-experimental","tag-public-sociology"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/333"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":157,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions\/157"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/methods\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}