{"id":720,"date":"2010-05-05T08:59:34","date_gmt":"2010-05-05T12:59:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/?p=720"},"modified":"2010-05-05T08:59:34","modified_gmt":"2010-05-05T12:59:34","slug":"online-dating-sites-graphing-the-field","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/2010\/05\/05\/online-dating-sites-graphing-the-field\/","title":{"rendered":"Online dating sites &#8211; Graphing the field"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_721\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-721\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/files\/2010\/05\/dating-graph.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/files\/2010\/05\/dating-graph.jpg\" alt=\"An Overview of the Online Dating Field by Zosia Bielski and Tonia Cowan\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-721\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An Overview of the Online Dating Field by Zosia Bielski and Tonia Cowan<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>What Works<\/h3>\n<p>Imagine this data as a bar graph that illustrates how many users each site has.  Maybe there is even some sort of inception date from the site included, too.  That would be a typical way to represent this sort of data because all the reporters had in terms of numbers, were user totals.  But they weren&#8217;t interested in simply showing how big one site was with respect to another. They were interested in discussing hook-up culture.  Now, so far as I know, there is no agreed upon quantitative measure of &#8216;hooking up&#8217;.  These folks didn&#8217;t claim to invent one (which is nice).  They just used a couple different qualitative axes to illustrate the distinctions they saw within the field of online dating when it comes to marriage vs. hooking up and raunchiness vs. wholesomeness. <\/p>\n<p>I think Bourdieu would have recognized some of his own influence here.  He had similar Cartesian field maps in <i>Distinction<\/i>.  Granted, he may not have been thrilled to have his concept used to describe online dating &#8211; &#8216;raunchy&#8217; is a word that may not have been part of his vocabulary.  On the other hand, his axis of choice probably would have been class (high and low) and as far as I can tell, the desire for lasting vs. fleeting sex does not show a clear relationship to class.  Feel free to debate that assertion in the comments.<\/p>\n<h3>What Needs Work<\/h3>\n<p>Not a fan of the colors.  I also wonder how certain smaller sites made the list &#8211; seems a bit arbitrary considering how many sites were left off the list.<\/p>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<p>Bielski, Zosia. (2009, April 9) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/life\/article967802.ece\">&#8220;One Click Stands&#8221;<\/a> in The Globe and Mail.  [Tonia Cowan also contributed to the production of the graphic.]<\/p>\n<p>Bourdieu, Pierre. [tras. Richard Nice] (1987) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Distinction-Social-Critique-Judgement-Taste\/dp\/0674212770\">Distinction:  A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste<\/a>.  Cambridge, MA:  Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What Works Imagine this data as a bar graph that illustrates how many users each site has. Maybe there is even some sort of inception date from the site included, too. That would be a typical way to represent this sort of data because all the reporters had in terms of numbers, were user totals. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":218,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2024,99],"class_list":["post-720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-charts","tag-relationships"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/218"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=720"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":723,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720\/revisions\/723"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}