{"id":1730,"date":"2011-09-29T15:31:43","date_gmt":"2011-09-29T19:31:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/?p=1730"},"modified":"2012-09-04T17:53:59","modified_gmt":"2012-09-04T21:53:59","slug":"food-blog-study-descriptive-statistics-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/2011\/09\/29\/food-blog-study-descriptive-statistics-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Food blog study descriptive statistics part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_1731\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1731\" style=\"width: 468px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/files\/2011\/09\/food-blog-study-descriptive-stats-1.gif\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/files\/2011\/09\/food-blog-study-descriptive-stats-1.gif\" alt=\"Food Blog Study Descriptive Statistics Part 1 - Blogger Demographics\" width=\"468\" height=\"951\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1731\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/files\/2011\/09\/food-blog-study-descriptive-stats-1.gif 468w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/files\/2011\/09\/food-blog-study-descriptive-stats-1-147x300.gif 147w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 468px) 100vw, 468px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1731\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Food Blog Study Descriptive Statistics Part 1 - Blogger Demographics<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>What works<\/h3>\n<p>Over the summer I surveyed 280 English-speaking food bloggers who were randomly drawn from a network of 23,000.  Only the bloggers with email addresses, contact forms, or twitter accounts were invited to participate (obvious reasons&#8230;if I couldn&#8217;t get in touch with them, I couldn&#8217;t invite them to participate).<\/p>\n<p>The graphic above represents my first attempt to present some of the basic descriptive statistics &#8211; gender, age, marital status, educational attainment, number of kids &#8211; just to see what works visually.  Normally, this kind of information is presented in tables (I have those, too), but I wanted to try to add some horizontal bar graphs for impact.  I kept them horizontal so that the axes labels would be easier to read.  <\/p>\n<p>The percentages are listed; the frequencies are represented visually.<\/p>\n<p>Just for comparison sake (which is kind of difficult):  the average age of people in the US is 37.2 (it&#8217;s 38.5 for females); about 50.5% of Americans are married now and only 2.5% are cohabiting. As for education, 28.5% didn&#8217;t get another degree after H.S., 17.7% stopped after their bachelor&#8217;s degree, and 10.4% have professional degrees.  Clearly, the food bloggers are well-educated and more likely to be cohabiting than the American averages.  I added these comparisons in response to Rob&#8217;s request. I know it would have been better to add them to the graphic, but the comparisons are a little tricky because the Census data is looking at a wider age range and I haven&#8217;t found any good summary stats on bloggers in general (which would be better than the aggregate comparison to the whole national pool).<\/p>\n<h3>What needs work<\/h3>\n<p>This strategy would not work for the entire set of variables &#8211; boring after a while.  I am trying to think of better ways to show more variables at once without just building a column that goes on and on forever.<\/p>\n<p>For more on &#8220;what needs work&#8221; see the comments section.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What works Over the summer I surveyed 280 English-speaking food bloggers who were randomly drawn from a network of 23,000. Only the bloggers with email addresses, contact forms, or twitter accounts were invited to participate (obvious reasons&#8230;if I couldn&#8217;t get in touch with them, I couldn&#8217;t invite them to participate). The graphic above represents my [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":218,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11504],"tags":[11515,11502,16741],"class_list":["post-1730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-food-blog-study-2","tag-descriptive-statistics","tag-food-blog-study","tag-by-l-noren"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/218"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1730"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2362,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1730\/revisions\/2362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/graphicsociology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}