{"id":8530,"date":"2017-01-05T07:24:45","date_gmt":"2017-01-05T13:24:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/?p=8530"},"modified":"2017-01-05T07:24:45","modified_gmt":"2017-01-05T13:24:45","slug":"better-journalism-is-good-for-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/2017\/01\/05\/better-journalism-is-good-for-women\/","title":{"rendered":"Better Journalism is Good for Women"},"content":{"rendered":"

Journalists\u2019 fixation on objectivity resulted in an embarrassment of deceptive comparisons<\/a> during the election. Reporters\u2019 use of false equivalencies, oversimplifying one shared trait to compare issues, bears a remarkable resemblance to reporting practices that have impeded progress for women. For example, the myth<\/a> that women abuse their partners at comparable rates as men is partly attributable to false equivalency reporting, distorting what people believe causes domestic violence and how they imagine solving it.<\/p>\n

\"false-equivalences\"<\/p>\n

The parallels don\u2019t stop there. Attempts to undermine mainstream new<\/a>s are emblematic of the ways men discredit women\u2019s voices. Russian internet trolls spread propaganda<\/a> during the election, using similar tactics as virtually organized \u201cfathers\u2019 rights\u201d groups<\/a> who denounce biased child custody cases\u2014despite research<\/a> showing alleged abusers are twice as likely to be awarded custody than protective parents. Pervasive faux controversies during the election distracted from policy debates, resembling the way the decades-long preoccupation with \u201cmommy wars\u201d delegitimized discussion<\/a> of policies designed to help women meet work and family demands. The problems of both-sides reporting<\/a> is akin to comparing ill-informed men\u2019s opinions on reproductive health policy to health providers\u2019 expert recommendations.<\/p>\n

Amid the post-election disappointment that another glass ceiling would not be shattered, there is a silver lining in increased demands for better journalism. New research is asking why people believe lies<\/a>. The commentary generated by a Teen Vogue<\/em> article<\/a> and the cancellation of the television show Good Girls Revolt<\/em><\/a> spotlighted the importance of bringing underrepresented groups to the table. And there is hope that changing how news is reported can alter public opinion. After journalists began reporting climate change denial<\/a> as misinformation, almost 10 percent more Americans<\/a> acknowledged the seriousness of global warming than the previous year. Mainstream pleas for quality journalism offer an opportunity to improve reporting important to our democracy, and to women\u2019s equality.<\/p>\n

Joanna Rae Pepin<\/strong> (@CoffeeBaseball<\/a>) is a PhD candidate in the Department of Sociology at the University of Maryland. Her research examines the intersection of the transformation of families and progress towards gender equality. Her current projects investigate the mechanisms behind the way couples share money within their families, and how these in turn shape power dynamics within romantic relationships.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Journalists\u2019 fixation on objectivity resulted in an embarrassment of deceptive comparisons during the election. Reporters\u2019 use of false equivalencies, oversimplifying one shared trait to compare issues, bears a remarkable resemblance to reporting practices that have impeded progress for women. For example, the myth that women abuse their partners at comparable rates as men is partly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1903,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21108],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nice-work"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1903"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8530"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8535,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8530\/revisions\/8535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}