{"id":7974,"date":"2015-04-23T07:17:08","date_gmt":"2015-04-23T12:17:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/?p=7974"},"modified":"2015-04-23T07:17:08","modified_gmt":"2015-04-23T12:17:08","slug":"is-time-travel-easier-than-passing-affordable-childcare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/2015\/04\/23\/is-time-travel-easier-than-passing-affordable-childcare\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Time Travel Easier than Passing Affordable Childcare?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Wishful<\/a><\/strong>\u201cThat\u2019s your solution?,” asks a character in my She Writes co-founder Kamy Wicoff’s debut novel. “Time travel is easier than passing affordable childcare?\u201d Rarely do we cover novels here at Girl w\/Pen, but given the subject matter (and, full disclosure, the fact that I think Kamy is the bomb), I’ve become interested anew in the question of fiction as a mode of advancing public conversation. As someone who once considered writing a dissertation on popular feminist fiction from the 1970s, I’m obsessed with the portrayal of women’s issues — and working mothers’ issues in particular — in popular discourse, imagined and real. Can fiction centered on work\/life issues bridge research and reality? Here’s how our conversation went down. -Deborah<\/em><\/p>\n

DS: Wishful Thinking<\/em><\/a> joins working-mother dramadies like Alison Pearson\u2019s I Don\u2019t Know How She Does It <\/em>and Where\u2019d You Go, Bernadette–<\/em>a contemporary genre in which a middle- or upper-class protagonist tries and fails to \u201cdo it all,\u201d breaks down, puts herself back together. What do you see as the advantages, and limitations, of fiction as a mode of advancing the conversation around working mothers\u2019 dilemmas? Is this a domestic drama, or a social one?<\/strong><\/p>\n

KW:<\/strong> Is the pressure to have, <\/strong>do, and be it all so great that only science fiction can solve it? In a way, I wrote the book as an argument against the notion that the increasingly impossible demands placed on working parents are each individual\u2019s problem to solve, by showing how crazy it is that my protagonist, Jennifer Sharpe, thinks forcing her body through a wormhole is a perfectly rational response to her out of whack work\/life balance\u2014more rational than trying to reform the out of balance system itself. (One of my favorite lines in the book comes from Jennifer\u2019s coworker, Alicia, who, when she finds out about the app, says, \u201cThat\u2019s your solution? Time travel <\/em>is easier than passing affordable child care?\u201d) Jennifer believes it is a domestic drama, but it is absolutely a social one, and I think by writing a novel rather than a nonfiction book on the subject, I was able to underscore that in a fresh way.<\/p>\n

The other inspiration for Wishful Thinking<\/em> was very personal, and inspired by fiction\u2014I was reading the Harry Potter books with my older son, and I thought, I love this, but I wish it were about a woman my age, not a ten-year-old boy. And then I thought, if I could give a working mom any power, what would it be? The answer, the ability to be in multiple places at once, came immediately, because it\u2019s a need I and every mother I know shares, whether she is juggling a job and kids or raising her kids full-time. But even that first impulse was feminist and socially conscious. I hungered for a fun, fanciful but thoughtful and grown up book about someone like me, by someone like me\u2014not something written for a YA audience or with yet another male protagonist I couldn\u2019t relate to\u2014because in the current fiction marketplace I was starving. (I Don\u2019t Know How She Does It<\/em> came out fourteen years ago, if you can believe that. And I have never gotten over the fact that they made Multiplicity<\/a> about a man. Really? It\u2019s the guy who feels like he has to be everywhere at once?) The premise I instantly arrived at is in itself a critique.<\/p>\n

\"Overwhelmed,<\/a>\"Mom's<\/a>Nonfiction, of course, can be more explicit in its critique and its calls to action. In an ideal world, a working parent would read Wishful Thinking<\/em>, then read Brigid Schulte\u2019s Overwhelmed: Work, Love And Play When No One Has The Time<\/em><\/a>, and then join MomsRising<\/a> and start petitioning her Congressperson like mad.<\/p>\n

DS: When we first created She Writes, we were two entrepreneurial mamas on a mission to start something and simultaneously be there for our very young kids. You, in fact, were an early model for me of what living two passions looks like. (Recall those staff meetings on my bed while I was on bedrest, carrying twins!) Five years later, I look around me and see mothers of all stripes struggling as if the decades of advocacy for better workplace policies in support of working families hasn\u2019t moved the dial. What\u2019s it going to take, other than wishful thinking? Any latest initiatives you\u2019re aware of that you\u2019d like to shout out here?\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

KW:<\/strong> It is easy to be discouraged, isn\u2019t it? (And how could I forget those staff meetings?) One of the things I liked most about Overwhelmed<\/em>, however, was Brigid\u2019s determination to tell success stories, most prominently in her \u201cWhen Work Works\u201d chapter, providing models for change rather than only pointing to what, in workplaces, is broken. (And that\u2019s a lot, like the fact that America is one of only 4 of 167 countries in the world with no paid leave for parents\u2014the others are Lesotho, Papua New Guinea, and Swaziland.) It was through Brigid\u2019s book that I found out about MomsRising<\/a>, and also about A Better Balance<\/a>, founded by Dina Bakst in New York. I also love LeanIn.org<\/a>, with its circles for peer support. And for many years I was on the Advisory Council for the Clayman Institute for Gender Research<\/a> at Stanford University, which does fabulous work under the leadership of Shelley Correll on supporting scholarship and research designed to move that heavy, heavy dial\u2014and gets that research into the hands of people with the power to make change. I\u2019m also looking forward to Laura Vanderkam\u2019s upcoming I Know How She Does It<\/a>, for some practical, actionable tools to alleviating some work\/life stress.<\/p>\n

DS: As much as your novel is a comment on work\/life condundrums, it\u2019s a satire of app-for-that culture and technology. Are our hyperconnected lives fuller lives, or lesser lives? Are we more connected to each other, or just to our apps?<\/strong><\/p>\n

KW: <\/strong>This is so hard to answer. On the one hand, I witness, as I think we all do, the clearly deleterious effect of our devices on our personal relationships; the other night my son and I were at a restaurant and the entire family at the table next to us was glued to their devices, oblivious to one another\u2014I\u2019m happy to say my son noticed first, and was appalled! The book is certainly about that, and a commentary on our addiction to our phones. (In the first scene Jennifer realizes she\u2019s lost her phone, and the panic and despair she feels are emotions I have to confess to having had in the same situation.) I\u2019m pretty good about managing my use when I\u2019m with my kids, but the pull to check email, Facebook, and the rest is very powerful, and does feel like an addiction at times, which is scary. On the other hand, my dad, who lives in Austin, can read stories to my kids, in Brooklyn, on Skype, which is magic. We have a shared family photo stream we all subscribe to, and I just saw my nephew have his first bite of rice cereal. I know what\u2019s happening in the lives of many more people than I would have ever thought possible, and am alerted to news, social justice issues, and causes I might never have been exposed to, through these platforms. Yet I fret about it. I feel often feel that while I may have more knowledge about more people in my life, I don\u2019t have richer relationships with them for it. (And as we all know, Facebook posts notoriously skew sunny.) Our generation is in a funny spot, not having grown up with any of this, but being so fully immersed in it now as adults, and as parents. Sometimes I wonder if our fretting will someday sound like the worries that television would spell the end of culture\u2026but maybe television has done that. Ha.<\/p>\n

DS<\/strong>: I don\u2019t want to give too much away, but a significant plot line in your book concerns a brilliant female physicist whose discovery goes unrecognized by the scientific authorities. What was the impetus for a strong woman scientist at the center of this text? <\/strong><\/p>\n

KW: <\/strong>There was never any question in my mind that the physicist who invented time travel would be a woman, for a variety of reasons. The obvious one, of course, is that the story of science and its major breakthroughs is told by and about men, leaving countless brilliant and deserving women out. Physics is particularly bad\u2014the Nobel Prize in Physics has only been awarded to two women in its history, and hasn\u2019t recognized a female physicist\u2019s work in fifty years<\/a>. In this notoriously sexist field, I wanted to create a character who had fought her way through, and in some cases inventively worked her way around, a system stacked against her. (I\u2019m also an amateur physics lover. Have you see Particle Fever<\/a>? There are some fabulous female scientists featured in that movie.) I also chose to make her a passionate collector of artifacts of female scientists who had come before her; for Dr. Sexton, these women are the muses. Researching that part of the book was a delight\u2014did you know Florence Nightingale was an accomplished mathematician<\/a>, and invented infographics? Or that Hedy Lamar co-invented spread spectrum and frequency hopping technology<\/a>? I also felt strongly that I didn\u2019t want to have magic in this book\u2014there\u2019s enough of that mushy, bibidi bobidi boo stuff out there already featuring women. Who needs a fairy godmother when you can have the greatest physicist of all time at your side? There was another, very compelling reason I wanted a strong women scientist at the center of my book. So I could make a Larry Summers joke. Which I did.<\/p>\n

DS: Virginia Woolf wrote, \u201cA woman writing thinks back through her mothers.\u201d You\u2019ve had some terrific literary mentors in your life\u2014Diane Middlebrook, Nancy K. Miller, Alix Kates Shulman, Francine Prose\u2026 Barring (ha!) for a moment the complicated maternal metaphor, in what ways have these women influenced your writing or your sense of yourself as a woman who writes?<\/strong><\/p>\n

KW:<\/strong> Well the late, great Diane, of course, is the model for Dr. Diane Sexton, the physicist who invents the app in the book. (Diane Middlebrook wrote the seminal biography of Anne Sexton, hence the name as homage.) I miss her every single day, and writing this book was a way of having her voice, her presence, and her inimitable style close to me for the year and a half it took to write it. Diane completely changed my life. She was the first person to look me in the eye, when I was a young graduate student who felt that, without an agent or a book, I could not call myself a writer, and say, \u201cYou are<\/em> a writer!\u201d in a way that made me believe it. She told me to write the truth about my life, and I have tried to honor her ever since then by doing it. We founded the Salon of Women Writers together in London in 2003 (again, when I was a young nobody, and she was an established badass, but she saw what a good team we\u2019d make), which led to my founding SheWrites.com<\/a> with you, and ultimately She Writes Press<\/a> with former Executive Editor of Seal Press Brooke Warner<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Diane believed that as a woman who writes, it\u2019s pointless to insist on being viewed simply as a \u201cwriter\u201d because the world doesn\u2019t view you that way\u2014the best thing is to resist that prejudice by critically responding when it inevitably rears its head, and always to combat it with wit, fearlessness, and of course, brilliant writing. Francine, Nancy and Alix all do that too. I derive so much courage and strength from their example. Hopefully I can do the same for a young woman writer or two someday. But as a debut novelist at forty-two, I\u2019m a little behind in the game.<\/p>\n

For more, check out Kamy’s post on Moms Rising<\/a>. Visit Kamy’s website<\/a>. Meet her on a stop during the She Writes Press National Spring Book Tour<\/a> – coming to Chicago on June 29 (I’m hosting!). And go buy the book<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

And as always, I invite you to join my Facebook <\/a> community, pin with me on Pinterest at Tots in Genderland<\/a>, follow @girlmeetsvoice<\/a>, and subscribe<\/a> to my quarterly newsletter to keep posted on coaching, workshops, writings, and talks.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cThat\u2019s your solution?,” asks a character in my She Writes co-founder Kamy Wicoff’s debut novel. “Time travel is easier than passing affordable childcare?\u201d Rarely do we cover novels here at Girl w\/Pen, but given the subject matter (and, full disclosure, the fact that I think Kamy is the bomb), I’ve become interested anew in the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1902,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21107],"tags":[31136,15,55,13,31134,31135,21938,27726],"class_list":["post-7974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mama-w-pen","tag-affordable-childcare","tag-culture","tag-gender","tag-inequality","tag-kamy-wicoff","tag-wishful-thinking","tag-worklife","tag-working-motherhood"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1902"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7974"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7982,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974\/revisions\/7982"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}