{"id":2012,"date":"2011-01-24T07:33:54","date_gmt":"2011-01-24T12:33:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/girlwpen.com\/?p=2012"},"modified":"2011-01-24T07:33:54","modified_gmt":"2011-01-24T12:33:54","slug":"nice-work-gender-inequality-that-doesnt-put-you-to-sleep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/2011\/01\/24\/nice-work-gender-inequality-that-doesnt-put-you-to-sleep\/","title":{"rendered":"NICE WORK: Gender inequality that doesn&#8217;t put you to sleep"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What we know: the dudes are getting better at  childcare and housework, and the ladies are easing off. But are they undoing gender?  If so, how much? Men have increased the average amount of childcare and  housework they do each week from 12, in 1965, to 21, in 2000. Meanwhile, women  have decreased their hours in the same tasks from 53 to 41 hours. Also note  that these days, women now provide about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogress.org\/issues\/2009\/10\/womans_nation.html\/#breadwinners\" target=\"_blank\">43 percent of household income<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So, there&#8217;s progress. It even looks like  \u201cconvergence.\u201d But there&#8217;s \u201csomething\u201d that keeps dragging us back into the past, into  unequal shares of domestic work, that gives us the feeling that there may be  more for us to look at than counting hours of care and percentage points of  household income.<\/p>\n<p>Take the case of sleep. New research in <a href=\"http:\/\/gas.sagepub.com\/content\/24\/6\/746.short\" target=\"_blank\">Gender  &amp; Society<\/a> (abstract) illustrates how even in dual-earner families, men&#8217;s sleep  takes priority over women&#8217;s sleep. Sleep is valuable for short term health and  mental functioning and long-term well-being related to things like immune  function and maintaining a healthy weight. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sleep_deprivation\">Sleep matters<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>How&#8217;d they learn this? Sociologists <a href=\"http:\/\/wfnetwork.bc.edu\/leaders_entry.php?id=60&amp;area=All\" target=\"_blank\">David Maume<\/a>, Rachel Sebastian (University of Cincinnati) and Anthony Bardo (Miami University) interviewed 25 white, two-earner, heterosexual families  where at least one partner was employed in the food services industry. Partners  were interviewed separately in order to learn about how these families  organize their sleep routines.<\/p>\n<p>The women wake up more because they are largely the &#8220;default parent.&#8221; That means they wake up for the kids, for problem solving, for doing things for the men. The men&#8217;s paid work (and their need to be  rested for it) took priority. The women even expected themselves\u2014and the men  they were with expected them\u2014to stick around in the \u201cmarital bed\u201d even when the  men&#8217;s snoring kept them awake. In the mornings, men woke up refreshed, women  woke up tired, just in time to rejoin an endless cycle of falling behind and  playing catch up again.<\/p>\n<p>Any exceptions? Overall the researchers found that  of the 25 couples they interviewed, 4 qualified as equal partners\u2014where men and  women were similarly engaged in all kinds of childcare and domestic work. The remainder were couples that were \u201cpragmatic egalitarians\u201d&#8211;accepting the practical necessity of both partner&#8217;s working. For these couples the men  were committed to gender essentialism\u2014a deep seated belief that women <em>really <\/em>are the appropriate and natural caregivers at home. You know, the \u201cthey&#8217;re  better at it\u201d view. They also found that some of the women held a \u201cfamily first philosophy\u201d and the rest spent time worrying about their partner&#8217;s qualifications for caring.<\/p>\n<p>So, there&#8217;s something about sleep here, but there&#8217;s something about marriage here, too. While all of these couples had some features that looked like they were \u201cegalitarian,\u201d they weren&#8217;t living  up to the dream. That seems to be harder than we thought. Back in the 1990s  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drpepperschwartz.com\/\">Pepper Schwartz <\/a>looked for truly egalitarian couples when she did her research  on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/articles\/199409\/modernizing-marriage\" target=\"_blank\">peer marriage<\/a>. She found a lot of couples who thought they were  egalitarian, but they were what she called \u201cnear peers,\u201d recreating subtle and not so  subtle versions of traditional gender roles. Let&#8217;s celebrate the changes since Schwartz&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0028740610\/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&amp;pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&amp;pf_rd_t=201&amp;pf_rd_i=0029317150&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_r=1S2GXP5DC5P78EWJTF3H\" target=\"_blank\">Love Between Equals<\/a><\/em> \u2013 there&#8217;s more convergence of roles and  opportunities for men and women in families with each passing year. But let&#8217;s stay on  the look out, as Maume and colleagues did, for the ways that couples  recreate gender inequality.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<a href=\"..\/?page_id=31\" target=\"_blank\">Virginia Rutter<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What we know: the dudes are getting better at childcare and housework, and the ladies are easing off. But are they undoing gender? If so, how much? Men have increased the average amount of childcare and housework they do each week from 12, in 1965, to 21, in 2000. Meanwhile, women have decreased their hours [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1903,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21108],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nice-work"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1903"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2012\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}