{"id":1893,"date":"2010-06-16T09:11:29","date_gmt":"2010-06-16T14:11:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/girlwpen.com\/?p=1893"},"modified":"2010-06-16T09:11:29","modified_gmt":"2010-06-16T14:11:29","slug":"nice-work-whats-the-big-deal-about-men-earning-less","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/2010\/06\/16\/nice-work-whats-the-big-deal-about-men-earning-less\/","title":{"rendered":"NICE WORK: what&#8217;s the big deal about men earning less?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ihhcpar.rutgers.edu\/about_us\/members.asp?v=2&amp;i=484\" target=\"_blank\">Kristen Springer<\/a>, a sociology professor at Rutgers,  presented some very cool research on men&#8217;s health at the recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.contemporaryfamilies.org\/\">Council on Contemporary  Families<\/a> conference, and a related paper in the journal <a href=\"http:\/\/gas.sagepub.com\/cgi\/content\/abstract\/24\/3\/378\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Gender &amp; Society<\/em><\/a> (abstract only) is out  now. She was looking at men who earn less than their wives. You need to know what she discovered next time you are trying to  figure out what  to make of those articles in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/01\/11\/fashion\/11berrys.html?ref=unemployment\" target=\"_blank\">New York Times<\/a> or wherever  about the &#8220;troubling impact&#8221; on the changing economic status of men and   women. See <a href=\"http:\/\/girlwpen.com\/?p=1810\">this post<\/a> for background in the &#8220;new economics&#8221; of marriage.<\/p>\n<p>Springer asked if men who earn less (specifically less than half)  than their wives have worse health than men who earn the same or more.  The simple answer: yes. But hold up! Don&#8217;t go yet. There&#8217;s more, and it  is important.<\/p>\n<p>Because Springer asked <strong>why<\/strong>. She looked at whether it was  because of who gets to make decisions in the couple, and came back with the  answer NO.<\/p>\n<p>She looked at whether it was because of marital  unhappiness among these couples, and came back with the answer NO.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, there weren&#8217;t couple issues or any kind of home  front &#8220;war between the sexes&#8221; being played out here.<\/p>\n<p>No, it looks  like, instead, there is a <strong>war within the sexes<\/strong> going on.<\/p>\n<p>She looked at a high fallutin&#8217; but also very powerful concept that  folks in the biz call &#8220;hegemonic masculinity&#8221; &#8212; that is, the &#8220;most  honored way of being a man&#8221; in a given society (see <a href=\"http:\/\/gas.sagepub.com\/cgi\/content\/short\/19\/6\/829\" target=\"_blank\">Connell  and Messerschmidt 2005<\/a> if you wanna read up).\u00a0 In the US, men&#8217;s  breadwinning is a central component to this. This means that men&#8217;s  earnings puts them on top of the heap, over other men (as well as over  their women).<\/p>\n<p>Here is what she found: For men who were <em>not<\/em> earning less, the more money he and his family earned, the healthier he  said he was. This is your basic wealth equals health situation. (In the figure below, this means the blue bars are higher at the rich end, lower at the poor end.)<\/p>\n<p>But  for men who were earning less than their wives, the<em> guys at the top of the  heap were the only ones to report significantly worse health <\/em>relative  to guys earning the same or more than their spouse. The guys at the top, for some reason, were especially  stressed by the inequality. The study didn&#8217;t have direct  measures of men&#8217;s beliefs about the situation, but it looks a lot like  <em>only<\/em> for men of the upper ranks is there a sense that earning less than  their wives constitutes a failure. (In the figure the red bars are lower for the rich guys.)<\/p>\n<p>Springer&#8217;s key graph looks like this:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ihhcpar.rutgers.edu\/about_us\/members.asp?v=2&amp;i=484\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/farm5.static.flickr.com\/4067\/4691253407_d7df6df0bb_s.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"227\" height=\"127\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>(click here for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/41579021@N06\/4701843004\/\">the full version<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s the  take home from this? First, beware of stories that bemoan what is  happening to men in the face of women&#8217;s growing presence in the job  market and the economy. The health hardships for the men at the bottom  of the ladder <em>are not<\/em> about gender inequality, they are about the  hardships of inequality, full stop (the blue bars). Second, recognize that when we are anxious for men (or they are anxious for themselves) about being breadwinners this isn&#8217;t about <em>being a man<\/em>; it is about <em>social class<\/em>. It is almost as if the better-off can  &#8220;afford&#8221; to have gender strife, just as in decades past they could  afford to have a stay-at-home wife when everybody else required two  earners. Finally, don&#8217;t be taken in by the notion of the immutable  organization of gender in families (nor by the notion that social class doesn&#8217;t exist or doesn&#8217;t have a meaningful cultural as well as economic impact).<\/p>\n<p>Springer recommends a whole bunch of policies that create more  economic justice for all by creating more family friendly policies that  can in the end help to eradicate &#8220;hegemonic masculinity.&#8221; Well that  won&#8217;t be a slogan you&#8217;ll use with your Member of Congress, but just  wanted to call it what it is.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<a href=\"..\/?page_id=31\" target=\"_blank\">Virginia  Rutter<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kristen Springer, a sociology professor at Rutgers, presented some very cool research on men&#8217;s health at the recent Council on Contemporary Families conference, and a related paper in the journal Gender &amp; Society (abstract only) is out now. She was looking at men who earn less than their wives. You need to know what she [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1903,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21108],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nice-work"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1903"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}