{"id":1329,"date":"2008-11-11T08:02:31","date_gmt":"2008-11-11T13:02:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/girlwpen.com\/?p=1329"},"modified":"2008-11-11T08:02:31","modified_gmt":"2008-11-11T13:02:31","slug":"the-bush-era-and-the-woman-child","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/2008\/11\/11\/the-bush-era-and-the-woman-child\/","title":{"rendered":"SEX AND SENSIBILITY: The Bush Era and the Woman-Child"},"content":{"rendered":"

If you’ve been subway traveling in NYC in the past year, then you may have noticed the proliferation of ads for Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs), which often feature the shadowy face of a young woman, and some text about “having more than one choice” or “if only I’d known.” We’ve heard from RH Reality Check<\/a> about the misleading information spread by CPCs and their partner organizations, and Pandagon<\/a> featured the story of a woman who called up a CPC, claimed that she had headaches but was not sexually active, but was still informed that she might be pregnant and should make an appointment. <\/p>\n

Ms. Magazine<\/a> adds to these damning exposes with an article<\/a> in their latest issue featuring two college-aged women who went to check out the CPCs their college health centers directed them to. That bears repeating: their COLLEGE health centers. In fact, according to the article, 48% of college health centers that responded to a survey by the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance directed college students to CPCs. <\/p>\n

What do these young women get when they’re directed the CPC way? Well first, one gets a delay, which is the last thing a woman considering pregnancy options wants. Then, upon arrival, she is handed the typical post-abortion stress fact sheets:<\/p>\n

\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Even before I found out I wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t pregnant, the counselor said I should abstain from sex,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d says Lopez. She was given a fact sheet on \u00e2\u20ac\u0153post-abortion stress\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and asked to fill out a form that sought nonmedical information about her family and her religious beliefs. And then, when her urine test revealed not a pregnancy but a possible urinary tract infection, the center did not offer her any medical treatment or refer her elsewhere.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Lacking medical personnel, the goal of these centers is not to provide a woman with an array of options, but to convince her that having an abortion will be ruinous to her mental, physical, and emotional well-being. Have a history of breast cancer in the family? If you have an abortion, you’ve signed your death warrant.<\/p>\n

While there have been campaigns against these centers and their advertisements, including legislation<\/a> from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) seeking to hold CPCs to “truth in advertising” standards, CPCs receive millions in federal grants ($60 million according to a 2006 Washington Post report<\/a>), coming from taxpayer dollars, to fund their operations. <\/p>\n

But besides the Bush administration’s long affiliation with abstinence-only education and obsession with re-opening the culture wars (on a side note, an interesting article from Frank Rich<\/a>: with the defeat of three key anti-choice votes in South Dakota, Colorado, and California, has the American populace finally proved that they’re moving beyond this particular culture war?), we shouldn’t be surprised by their funding for these programs. After all, the paternalistic “protection” of a woman’s psyche, treating her as a woman-child who can’t be trusted to make these decisions on her own, has been at the forefront of reproductive legislation, appointments, and Supreme Court debates throughout the Bush administration:<\/p>\n

    1. The appointment of Dr. W. David Hager to the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs in 2004. As The Nation<\/a> wrote, Dr. Hager was the author of “Stress and the Woman’s Body<\/em> and As Jesus Cared for Women<\/em>, self-help tomes that interweave syrupy Christian spirituality with paternalistic advice on women’s health and relationships.”<\/p>\n

    2. The appointment of Eric Keroack as chief of family-planning programs at the Department of Health and Human Services in 2006. As Susan Jacoby<\/a> wrote in the Washington Post at the time, “In his view, anyone who has premarital sex is less likely to form a healthy relationship later in life because every orgasm somehow reduces a person’s capacity for deep emotional attachment. Dr. Keroack’s view of orgasm was approximately that of Gen. Jack D. Ripper in the movie Dr. Strangelove. Gen. Ripper, as you may recall, was concerned about the Russians stealing his ‘precious bodily fluids.'”<\/p>\n

    3. And finally, the most notorious and egregious example, was the ruling in Gonzales vs. Carhart, where the Supreme Court upheld the federal partial-birth abortion ban, primarily on the paternalistic claim of the Inconstant Female. As Dahlia Lithwick<\/a> brilliantly argued at the time, “Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion is less about the scope of abortion regulation than an announcement of an astonishing new test: Hereinafter, on the morally and legally thorny question of abortion, the proposed rule should be weighed against the gauzy sensitivities of that iconic literary creature: the Inconstant Female.”<\/ol>\n

    Ah yes, the fragile female psyche. Too weak to handle a few bad brushes with males, as the purity proponents argue, too fickle to be decisive on their own reproductive choices. We shouldn’t be surprised that CPCs have been federally funded under Bush, but we should hope that President-Elect Obama ushers in a new era where women are no longer treated as child-citizens.<\/p>\n

    –Kristen Loveland<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    If you’ve been subway traveling in NYC in the past year, then you may have noticed the proliferation of ads for Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs), which often feature the shadowy face of a young woman, and some text about “having more than one choice” or “if only I’d known.” We’ve heard from RH Reality Check […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1901,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21115],"tags":[2079],"class_list":["post-1329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sex-and-sensibility","tag-reproductive-justice"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1901"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1329"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1329\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/girlwpen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}