{"id":927,"date":"2015-01-29T14:33:46","date_gmt":"2015-01-29T14:33:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/?p=927"},"modified":"2015-01-29T14:33:46","modified_gmt":"2015-01-29T14:33:46","slug":"cosmopolitan-masculinities-and-gender-omnivorousness-transformations-in-gender-and-inequality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/2015\/01\/29\/cosmopolitan-masculinities-and-gender-omnivorousness-transformations-in-gender-and-inequality\/","title":{"rendered":"Cosmopolitan Masculinities and Gender Omnivorousness: Transformations in Gender and Inequality*"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Lands'
Image credit: Lands’ End’s Winter 2015 Men’s clothing catalog.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The advertisement depicted here comes out of a Lands\u2019 End catalog I received in the mail last week. The text reads: \u201cNew blue collar shirts white collar guys will love.\u201d It\u2019s a subtle message and surely, some will think I am making too much of it. But, it is one small piece of a larger cultural process taking place–in this case, how class inequality gets commodified and sold back to young, straight, white men as evidence of their masculine credibility and cosmopolitan taste in gender performance and display. This is one configuration of hybrid masculinity<\/a> in practice. It allows for a form of what I call \u201cpracticed indifference\u201d whereby young, straight, white men are able to appear relaxed, content, and at ease with an increasingly varied range of gender performances.<\/p>\n

What we think of as \u201cmasculine\u201d is something that shifts over time and from place to place. Historical and cross-cultural research shows that just about anything you might think of as essentially \u201cmasculine\u201d has been\u2014at one time or another, in one place or another\u2014thought of as anything but. This is part of what makes studying masculinity so exciting to me: it\u2019s an unstable object of inquiry and there are lots of moving parts. Michael Kimmel<\/a> sums up a really important finding from his historical research on masculinity with a simple statement: \u201c[D]efinitions of masculinity are historically reactive<\/em> to changing definitions of femininity\u201d (here<\/a>: 123). We don\u2019t often think of those in power as capable of being \u201cpushed around.\u201d But the historical relationship between masculinity and femininity suggests precisely this pattern.<\/p>\n

My own research<\/a> suggests that one way gender inequality is perpetuated is by being flexible, capable of adapting to new circumstances, challenges, and contingencies. And one of the ways masculinities exhibit these qualities is through practices of appropriation\u2014what C.J. Pascoe<\/a> and I refer to as \u201cstrategic borrowing\u201d in our theorization of hybrid masculinities<\/a>. At historical moments when gender inequality is publicly challenged and threatened, configurations of masculinity shift\u2014and they do so in pattered directions. When gender inequality is publicly threatened, a range of strategies emerge.\u00a0 We may collectively exalt configurations of masculinity that exaggerate gender difference and implicitly promote the continued necessity of gender segregation.\u00a0 But the discourse of what Michael Messner<\/a> referred to as the “new man”<\/a> can emerge as well, involving the “softening” of some features of masculinity.\u00a0 And one way this happens is through a process by which (some) men strategically borrow configurations of gendered practice and presentation from various groups of Others.\u00a0 This whole process has the effect of obscuring relations of power and inequality between men and women and among men as well.<\/p>\n

As I argued earlier in my post on hipster masculinity<\/a> and my post with D\u2019Lane Compton<\/a> on the rise of the \u201clumbersexual,\u201d<\/a> men who occupy positions of incredible privilege (young, middle- and upper-class, able-bodied, heterosexual) are increasingly borrowing elements of masculinities that do not \u201cbelong\u201d to them. Cultural aesthetics associated with marginalized and subordinated groups (though often this relies on stereotypes and, occasionally, myths) are commodified, consumed, and work to situate certain privileged groups as more cosmopolitan as a result. These processes sometimes appear to situate young, straight, white guys as increasingly interested in equality and as more \u201cmulticultural\u201d than Other men (who get cast as the “real problem” in this discourse). A consequence of this process is that it works to obscure some men\u2019s positions within contemporary relations of power and inequality.<\/p>\n

Inequalities are much easier to accept when we believe them to be just. This cosmopolitan taste in gender increasingly displayed by groups of young, straight, white men makes it appear that masculinities are opening up, becoming less dictatorial, and more democratic. Yet, the new forms that this omnivorousness in gender performance and politics is taking also works to reproduce privilege in historically novel ways. While young, straight, white men may not be the only ones flirting with these new styles<\/em> of gender performance and display, they may be receiving a qualitatively different set of benefits from their engagement.<\/p>\n

Indeed, research suggests that while it might look different today, this is a historical process. Young, middle and upper class, straight, white men became interested in exercise and building muscles around the time that this muscle was no longer necessary to earn a living (for these men). The Boy Scouts of America emerged at the turn of the century to ensure boys learned survival skills no longer required for the lives these boys would lead or the work they would eventually pursue. Young groups got interested in Black musicians and jazz at a point in our history when privilege started to feel \u201cdull\u201d when compared with the seemingly more \u201cauthentic\u201d identities of Others\u2014identities formed, in part, by the very same systems of inequality that these practices of appropriation protect. Matthew Hughey<\/a> has addressed similar practices of racialized appropriation by whites<\/a> and Shamus Khan<\/a> finds a parallel mode of classed and racialized cultural appropriation among elites<\/a>. But, it\u2019s not just classed and racialized. Hybrid masculinities demonstrate that this is a gendered and sexualized practice as well.<\/p>\n

Through \u201cstrategically borrowing\u201d elements from marginalized and subordinated groups, hybrid masculinities \u201cdiscursively distance\u201d the men who mobilize these configurations of gender from masculinities that have been successfully challenged by feminist activism and reform. Yet, this discursive distance is more symbolic than \u201creal\u201d in the sense that it does not actually challenge the systems of power and inequality that are largely still in place\u2014rather, it obscures them, fortifying the same inequalities in new ways.<\/p>\n

_______________________<\/p>\n

*This is a small piece of the argument I\u2019m pursuing in a book prospectus and manuscript I\u2019m currently working on that traces transformations in gender politics and performances among three separate groups of men.\u00a0 I didn’t use any of my data here as I’m saving that for the book.\u00a0 But I’m loving the finding some of my ideas apparent in advertisements too.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The advertisement depicted here comes out of a Lands\u2019 End catalog I received in the mail last week. The text reads: \u201cNew blue collar shirts white collar guys will love.\u201d It\u2019s a subtle message and surely, some will think I am making too much of it. But, it is one small piece of a larger […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1958,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30335],"tags":[30434,30435,30436,27669,27668],"class_list":["post-927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminist-sociology","tag-cosmopolitan-masculinity","tag-gender-omnivore","tag-gender-omnivorousness","tag-hybrid-masculinities","tag-hybrid-masculinity"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1958"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=927"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":951,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions\/951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/feminist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}