{"id":624,"date":"2011-12-29T13:36:08","date_gmt":"2011-12-29T18:36:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/?p=624"},"modified":"2011-12-29T18:33:11","modified_gmt":"2011-12-29T23:33:11","slug":"one-kid-two-kid-pink-kid-blue-kid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/2011\/12\/29\/one-kid-two-kid-pink-kid-blue-kid\/","title":{"rendered":"One Kid, Two Kid, Pink Kid, Blue Kid"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure style=\"width: 398px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/neonove\/2973760973\/in\/faves-32615476@N05\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"All Star\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.staticflickr.com\/3142\/2973760973_e644f8c8d3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"398\" height=\"260\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo by neonove via flickr<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In her forthcoming Indiana University Press book <em>Pink &amp; Blue: Telling the Girls from the Boys in America<\/em>, American studies scholar <a href=\"http:\/\/terpconnect.umd.edu\/%7Ejpaol\/\">Jo B. Paoletti<\/a> explores how it is that we&#8217;ve ended up with a blue section and a pink section in virtually every kids&#8217; store in the U.S. An <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smithsonianmag.com\/arts-culture\/When-Did-Girls-Start-Wearing-Pink.html\">April 2011 <em>Smithsonian Magazine<\/em> article<\/a> gives a primer on this color-coded development, Paoletti&#8217;s research, and gender socialization, including the intriguing paragraph:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>For example, a June 1918 article from the trade publication <em>Earnshaw&#8217;s Infants&#8217; Department <\/em>said, &#8220;The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that <em>pink, being a more decided and stronger color<\/em>, is more suitable for the boy, while <em>blue, which is more delicate and dainty<\/em>, is prettier for the girl.&#8221; Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti. [emphasis added]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Today&#8217;s color dictate,&#8221; the <em>Smithsonian<\/em> reporter writes, &#8220;wasn&#8217;t established until the 1940s as a result of American&#8217;s preferences as interpreted by manufacturers and retailers.&#8217;It could have gone the other way,&#8217; Paoletti says.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To read more about Paoletti and her research (including new work on how older women communicate through their dress), check out her website <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pinkisforboys.org\/about.html\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>And as a kicker, here&#8217;s a little girl who&#8217;s really not ready to accept the pink-and-blue paradigm:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/-CU040Hqbas\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In her forthcoming Indiana University Press book Pink &amp; Blue: Telling the Girls from the Boys in America, American studies scholar Jo B. Paoletti explores how it is that we&#8217;ve ended up with a blue section and a pink section in virtually every kids&#8217; store in the U.S. An April 2011 Smithsonian Magazine article gives [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10974,10976,10975],"class_list":["post-624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-gender-socialization","tag-jo-b-paoletti","tag-pink-blue"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/files\/2011\/12\/2973760973_e644f8c8d3.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=624"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":634,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624\/revisions\/634"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/editors\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}