{"id":8182,"date":"2015-04-08T10:19:08","date_gmt":"2015-04-08T10:19:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/&#038;p=8182"},"modified":"2015-10-13T19:22:21","modified_gmt":"2015-10-13T19:22:21","slug":"alternatives-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/2015\/04\/08\/alternatives-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Caught in the Culture Wars Crossfire"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='citation'>\n    <span class='authors'>Delia Baldassarri and Amir Goldberg, <\/span><span class='link'><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.1086\/676042\">&ldquo;Neither Ideologues nor Agnostics: Alternative Voters\u2019 Belief System in an Age of Partisan Politics,&rdquo; <em>American Journal of Sociology<\/em>,<\/a><\/span><span class='year'> 2014<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Many observers of American politics argue that since the mid 1980s, the increasing salience of so-called \u201c<em>social<\/em> issues,\u201d like abortion and same-sex marriage, has broken up coalitions of voters with common <em>economic<\/em> interests and has moved American politics to the right. They suggest moral issues have displaced class politics and that public opinion has grown more polarized as a result. Indeed, political elites package clearly defined positions on economic and social issues together into ideologies we call conservative and liberal.<\/p>\n<p>If all that\u2019s true, are people who are identify as socially liberal, economically conservative, or vice versa out of touch with mainstream politics? Or is the general public just less polarized than political leaders and the media? Moreover, what has party-line ideological packaging meant for electoral outcomes?<\/p>\n<p>In the <em>American Journal of Sociology<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/deliabaldassarri.org\/\">Delia Baldassarri<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stanford.edu\/~amirgo\/\">Amir Goldberg<\/a> use 20 years of data (1984\u20132004) from the National Election Studies to show that many Americans have consistent and logical political ideas that don\u2019t align with either major party\u2019s ideological package. These voters, whom the authors call <em>alternatives<\/em>, are socially liberal and economically conservative (or vice versa), and their positions remain steady over time. Thus, as Democratic and Republican Party positions have become more polarized, alternatives\u2019 views have grown more distinct from them. Alternatives have no obvious home in either party.<\/p>\n<p>Though it\u2019s intuitive, the study makes it clear that the ties between economic and social issues made by the left and the right, which many people see as normal or natural, represent just two among the many belief systems that Americans actually hold. Alternatives\u2019 positions are logical, reasoned, and consistent&#8212;but unrepresented by either of the dominant ideologies. It is interesting, then, that alternatives usually vote Republican. The authors write that the most conservative among the alternatives\u2019 views tend to hold sway when it comes to picking a party.<\/p>\n<p>Two major findings emerge: 1) Beneath the ideologically divided rhetoric that is so prominent in American culture lies a public that is politically astute but unaligned. 2) The salience of moral issues is not the primary reason for Republicans\u2019 electoral success. Instead, for as-yet unknown reasons, alternative voters follow their more conservative leanings at the ballot, whether economic <em>or<\/em> social.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delia Baldassarri and Amir Goldberg, &ldquo;Neither Ideologues nor Agnostics: Alternative Voters\u2019 Belief System in an Age of Partisan Politics,&rdquo; American Journal of Sociology, 2014 Many observers of American politics argue that since the mid 1980s, the increasing salience of so-called \u201csocial issues,\u201d like abortion and same-sex marriage, has broken up coalitions of voters with common [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2003,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,85],"tags":[721,14907,4487,720,37336,75,33657,109],"class_list":["post-8182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-politics","tag-conservative","tag-sociology-of-culture","tag-democratic-party","tag-liberal","tag-politics","tag-republican-party","tag-social-issues","tag-voting"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2003"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8182"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8258,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8182\/revisions\/8258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}