{"id":7800,"date":"2014-11-10T15:41:25","date_gmt":"2014-11-10T15:41:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/&#038;p=7800"},"modified":"2015-10-13T19:31:01","modified_gmt":"2015-10-13T19:31:01","slug":"who-gets-shamed-for-sweatshops","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/2014\/11\/10\/who-gets-shamed-for-sweatshops\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Gets Shamed for Sweatshops?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='citation'>\n    <span class='authors'>Tim Bartley and Curtis Child, <\/span><span class='link'><a href=\"http:\/\/asr.sagepub.com\/content\/79\/4\/653.abstract\">&ldquo;Shaming the Corporation: The Social Production of Targets and the Anti-Sweatshop Movement,&rdquo; <em>American Sociological Review<\/em>,<\/a><\/span><span class='year'> 2014<\/span><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif\"><span style=\"font-size: medium\">After activists targeted the company\u2019s labor practices, Nike\u2019s swoosh became a symbol of the ills of the global economy. But, when nearly all major clothing brands produce their wares overseas in under-supervised but certainly less expensive factories, why did Nike take the hit?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif\"><span style=\"font-size: medium\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/tbsoc2\/\">Tim Bartley<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/fhssfaculty.byu.edu\/FacultyPage.aspx?id=cdc44\">Curtis Child <\/a>examine how certain corporations become the target of social movements. By focusing on the anti-sweatshop movement of the 1990s, they show that activists strategically select corporate targets, tending to focus on larger and more powerful firms and popular brands, such as Walmart, for strategic and symbolic reasons. These companies have a greater impact through their purchasing power and their iconic brands rely on public image. The bigger the target, it seems, the more vulnerable activists believe it will be, translating into more results: improved labor practices, better wages, and peer pressure on competitors.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif\"><span style=\"font-size: medium\">The authors gathered data on 151 major companies in the apparel industry and thousands of media and trade journal reports on actions by advocacy groups (these included protests, leafleting, and lawsuits) meant to change labor practices in the industry from 1993 to 2000, the heyday of the anti-sweatshop movement. Smaller firms that did not have active advertising campaigns and did not have positive images were unlikely to be targeted. On the other hand, companies that already had active social responsibility initiatives, advertising campaigns, and positive public images were more likely to face the ire of activists. Further, once these \u201cshamable\u201d companies were targeted, they became more likely to be the focus of advocates in the future.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif\"><span style=\"font-size: medium\">Bartley and Child conclude that activist&#8217;s strategies consider the cultural prominence of corporations as well as the company\u2019s position in the global economy, determining their target\u2019s potential to leverage social change. In this way, protest is an active social process rather than a haphazard, passionate reaction to the problems of globalization.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tim Bartley and Curtis Child, &ldquo;Shaming the Corporation: The Social Production of Targets and the Anti-Sweatshop Movement,&rdquo; American Sociological Review, 2014 After activists targeted the company\u2019s labor practices, Nike\u2019s swoosh became a symbol of the ills of the global economy. But, when nearly all major clothing brands produce their wares overseas in under-supervised but certainly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2000,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,85],"tags":[31671,14907,131,31670,37336,45],"class_list":["post-7800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-politics","tag-apparel-industry","tag-sociology-of-culture","tag-economy","tag-nike","tag-politics","tag-social-movements"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2000"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7800"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7800\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8272,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7800\/revisions\/8272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}