{"id":7334,"date":"2014-07-29T11:12:21","date_gmt":"2014-07-29T11:12:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/&#038;p=7334"},"modified":"2015-10-13T19:32:15","modified_gmt":"2015-10-13T19:32:15","slug":"diyurbandesign","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/2014\/07\/29\/diyurbandesign\/","title":{"rendered":"Guerilla Gardening, Gentrification, and the Implications of DIY Urban Design"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='citation'>\n    <span class='authors'>Gordon C. C. Douglas, <\/span><span class='link'><a href=\"http:\/\/www.asanet.org\/journals\/CC\/Mar14CCFeature.pdf\">&ldquo;Do-It-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal \u2018Improvement\u2019 Through Unauthorized Alteration,&rdquo; <em>City &#038; Community<\/em>,<\/a><\/span><span class='year'> 2014<\/span><\/div>\n<p>From guerrilla gardening and seed bombing to public book booths and homemade bike lanes, unauthorized alterations to public space are on the rise. In contrast to other, often illegal, alterations like graffiti and culture jamming, these interventions are meant to be functional improvements to local communities. After two years of fieldwork in 14 cities, including New York, London, New Orleans, and Toronto, <a href=\"http:\/\/home.uchicago.edu\/~gdouglas\/\">Gordon Douglas<\/a> coined this new form of alteration \u201cdo-it-yourself urban design\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Douglas found three forms of DIY urban design in his study: \u201cguerrilla greening,\u201d which is converting unused land for gardening; \u201cspontaneous streetscaping,\u201d the painting of traffic markings or installation of signage to ease traffic accidents; and \u201caspirational urbanism,\u201d which includes posting public notices or informational signs voicing community policies. While most media framing of these interventions is positive, Douglas calls for a more critical understanding of their implications.<\/p>\n<p>On the one hand, Douglas argues that these DIY innovations signal a critique of the widespread professionalization of urban planning and design that is prominent in Europe in North America. \u00a0According to Douglas, the people in his study treat public space as \u201copen to popular reinterpretation\u201d as they set out to change their community\u2019s infrastructure to better suit their needs. On the other hand, Douglas also points out that, although they are meant to be creative and helpful, these \u201cimprovements\u201d can also inadvertently contribute to gentrification and the displacement of low-income and minority groups by raising property values and increasing outside interest in the neighborhood.<\/p>\n<p>As individuals continue to take their community space into their own hands, it will be important to understand what these changes mean to them, but also to the community they are hoping to improve. \u00a0Or, as Douglas puts it, \u201cTo the degree that these actions are an indication of what some people actually want out of their urban surroundings, we could learn a great deal about how to design our urban spaces more responsively in the first place.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gordon C. C. Douglas, &ldquo;Do-It-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal \u2018Improvement\u2019 Through Unauthorized Alteration,&rdquo; City &#038; Community, 2014 From guerrilla gardening and seed bombing to public book booths and homemade bike lanes, unauthorized alterations to public space are on the rise. In contrast to other, often illegal, alterations like graffiti and culture jamming, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1957,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[14907,12847,18486,3340,7539],"class_list":["post-7334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","tag-sociology-of-culture","tag-diy","tag-gentrification","tag-public-space","tag-urban-design"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1957"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7334"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7334\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8279,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7334\/revisions\/8279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/discoveries\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}