{"id":23910,"date":"2019-06-04T04:42:56","date_gmt":"2019-06-04T08:42:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/?p=23910"},"modified":"2020-05-16T05:21:05","modified_gmt":"2020-05-16T09:21:05","slug":"from-youtube-to-tv-and-back-again-viral-video-child-stars-and-media-flows-in-the-era-of-social-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/2019\/06\/04\/from-youtube-to-tv-and-back-again-viral-video-child-stars-and-media-flows-in-the-era-of-social-media\/","title":{"rendered":"From YouTube to TV, and Back Again: Viral Video Child Stars and Media Flows in the Era of Social Media"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"377\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.13-pm-500x377.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23916\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.13-pm-500x377.png 500w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.13-pm-250x188.png 250w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.13-pm-400x301.png 400w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.13-pm-768x578.png 768w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.13-pm.png 1434w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Social Media Famous Children<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In light of recent discussions around the rights of social media famous children, where various journalists and scholars are calling for more accountability from influencer parents, social media platforms, and everyday audiences, my collaborator <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/tamaleaver\" target=\"_blank\">A\/Prof Tama Leaver<\/a> and I would like to share some snippets from our paper-in-progress regarding the networked trajectories of child virality for which another stakeholder \u2013 TV networks \u2013 must be held accountable.<br><br>The piece of research, &#8216;From YouTube to TV, and Back Again: Viral Video Child Stars and Media Flows in the Era of Social Media&#8217;, was last presented in October 2018 at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) 2018 conference in Montreal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">YouTube and TV<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>While talk shows and reality TV are often considered launching pads for ordinary people seeking to become celebrities, we argue that when children are concerned, especially when those children have had viral success on YouTube or other platforms, their subsequent appearance(s) on television highlight far more complex media flows. <br><br>At the very least, these flows are increasingly symbiotic, where television networks harness preexisting viral interest online to bolster ratings. However, the networks might also be considered parasitic, exploiting viral children for ratings in a fashion they and their carers may not have been prepared for. <br><br>In tracing the trajectory of Sophia Grace and Rosie from viral success to <em>The Ellen Show<\/em> we highlight these complexities, whilst simultaneously raising concerns about the long-term impact of these trajectories on the children being made increasingly and inescapably visible across a range of networks and platforms.<br><br>We draw on an extended data set largely comprising screengrabs, archived comments, press coverage, and volumes of field notes tracking historical events that unfolded in public trajectory of young children who go viral on the internet and on the media, but also utilise data derived from an ethnographically informed content analysis of young internet celebrities and a data-driven cultural studies analysis of childhood in the age of tracking devices. <br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Sophia Grace and Rosie<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>This research takes as its primary case study the trajectory and progress of cousins Sophia Grace Brownlee (b. 2003) and Rosie McClelland (b. 2006), who went viral on YouTube in 2011 at the ages of 8 and 5 for covering Nicki Minaj\u2019s Super Bass and were subsequently groomed by <em>The Ellen DeGeneres Show<\/em> into multi-platform celebrity.<br><br>Sophia Grace Brownlee (b. 2003) and Rosie McClelland (b. 2006) are a pair of cousins from Essex, England. Better known on the internet as \u201cSophia Grace and Rosie\u201d, the duo went viral on YouTube at ages 8 and 5 when Sophia Grace\u2019s mother uploaded a video of the girls singing Nicki Minaj\u2019s Super Bass in September 2011 (Sophia Grace 2011a). The viral video was the debut post on the YouTube channel \u201cSophia Grace\u201d, and has accumulated over 52 million views as of August 2017. A month later in October 2011, the girls were invited on <em>The Ellen DeGeneres Show<\/em> to be interviewed by show host Ellen and to reenact their viral performance. In a later segment, Nicki Minaj sprang a surprise on the girls where she appeared on stage at a last minute request to chat and sing with them. Both videos have recorded over 32 million and 122 million views respectively.<br><br>So well received were the girls on The Ellen DeGeneres Show and its YouTube channel that shortly after, behind-the-scenes footage of Sophia Grace &amp; Rosie were released on the Show\u2019s YouTube Channel, in a bid to capitalize upon their virality and extend the length of their appeal to the show\u2019s audience. Subsequently, the girls were subsumed into the programming of The Ellen DeGeneres Show as they represented the show at various red carpet and starred in branded content in the YouTube content vernacular of a vlog, promoting various brands and events. Sophia Grace &amp; Rosie eventually became a bona fide staple on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, hosting their own segment known as \u201c\u2018Tea Time\u2019 with Sophia Grace &amp; Rosie\u201d, with eight episodes between September 2012 and May 2013. It appears that The Ellen DeGeneres Show spotted talent and viral uptake of the girls early on, inviting them to celebrate their 100 millionth view on YouTube. Over subsequent years, the girls would frequently be featured talking about their personal lives, the experience of Britons regularly visiting America, their family lives, and the impact of their YouTube success, all of which both appeared on The Ellen Show and the Show\u2019s YouTube channel.  So you\u2019ve decided to start a YouTube channel for your brand, and you have been posting high quality videos with unique messages about your business. YouTube is a fantastic tool that can be used by businesses to reach audience members in a distinctive and meaningful way.\u00a0 In fact, more than\u00a063% of businesses\u00a0have created YouTube channels, and that number continues to grow each day. One of the reasons YouTube is so valuable to organizations, is the sheer number of active users on the platform. More than\u00a01.8 billion people\u00a0are active on YouTube each month, and according to Omnicare, over\u00a030 million people\u00a0use YouTube every single day. With some many individuals actively posting, liking, and commenting on videos, it is no wonder why businesses are choosing to position their brand on the popular platform. Another surprising statistic about the trendy video-sharing site, is that over\u00a0400,000 hours\u00a0of video is uploaded to YouTube each and every day. With such a large amount of content constantly being added to the site, it is important to make sure your videos stand out. A lot of factors go into what makes a video popular, including likes, views, shares, and number of comments. Many businesses and organizations are electing to buy <a href=\"https:\/\/www.galaxymarketing.global\/shop\/real-youtube-comments\/\">Real YouTube comments<\/a>  for their videos, and are significantly increasing their social presence in the process.<br><br>As the years past and the cousins approach teenhood, it became clear that the social media presence of Sophia Grace was more intentionally curated and branded for a career in the (internet) entertainment industry while Rosie faded into the background. Aside from the structural expansion of rebranding her YouTube channel to focus on Sophia Grace rather than the duo and starting a Facebook page as \u201cSophia Grace The Artist\u201d. Sophia Grace\u2019s digital estates also underwent content expansion has she began to produce her own music meet mainstream entertainment industry and collaborate with fellow internet celebrities. Since turning 13 in 2016, Sophia Grace formally launched her Influencer career by engaging in Influencer content vernacular and YouTube tropes including participating in internet viral trends unrelated to her music career such as making \u00a0and the Oreo challenge, engaging in the attention economy of clickbait such as Q&amp;As addressing her budding romantic life and expanding her presence in other genres on YouTube such as makeup tutorials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Networked Trajectories of Viral Child Celebrity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Following our fieldwork and content analysis of the social media presence and media coverage on Sophia Grace and Rosie, we offer the following model that details the steps and milestones through which children who first become viral on social media become systemically groomed into multi-media networked celebrities on both social and legacy media:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"377\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.19-pm-500x377.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23918\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.19-pm-500x377.png 500w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.19-pm-250x188.png 250w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.19-pm-400x301.png 400w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.19-pm-768x578.png 768w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.19-pm.png 1434w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Complex Media Flows<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>To some extent, the rise and popularity of can be understood as part of what Graeme Turner calls \u2018the demotic turn\u2019, the increasing repositioning of everyday people into the media spotlight, creating a form of celebrity via reality TV, talk shows and so forth (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Understanding-Celebrity-Graeme-Turner\/dp\/144625321X\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Turner, 2013<\/a>). This is reinforced by Sophia Grace (&amp; Rosie)\u2019s acknowledgement of <em>The Ellen DeGeneres Show <\/em>as the springboard for their expanded and extended fame post-virality in several of their public messages. However, we argue that the media flows relating to viral children as exemplified by Sophia Grace &amp; Rosie is more complex. Rather than \u2018creating\u2019 the fame of these children The Ellen DeGeneres Show and similar TV talk show formats opportunistically capitalize upon the social capital of such viral video children by harnessing their fame and packaging it into more accessible, commercial, and deliberate consumption bytes. The girls were viral stars before they were on TV, but the networks channeled, amplified and significantly capitalized on their emergent (viral) fame. So successful is this model of viral kid celebrity factories that The Ellen DeGeneres Show has curated its own series of adorable kids in a playlist of over 200 videos with such viral children engaging in various (commercial) activities on The Show. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Emerging Conclusions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"377\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.26-pm-500x377.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23917\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.26-pm-500x377.png 500w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.26-pm-250x188.png 250w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.26-pm-400x301.png 400w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.26-pm-768x578.png 768w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-06-04-at-4.30.26-pm.png 1434w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Viral fame online and more recognised televisual fame are increasingly blurring, with both symbiotic and parasitic relationships emerging as television networks seek to harness, and create, online attention. Viral children such as Sophia Grace and Rose exemplify this complexity, where the televisual and online flows are multiple and complex. At the heart of these flows, though, are an increasing number of children who amplified viral fame must be carefully position in commercial, social and care terms. As more and more children are featured online as proto-influencers and microcelebrities, often managed and produced by their parents, and sometimes being amplified and harnessed by more traditional media forms such as television, the rights of the children in these instances \u2013 to privacy, to self-determination and so forth (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1461444816686318\" target=\"_blank\">Livingstone &amp; Third, 2017<\/a>) \u2013 must be more robustly and transparently discussed. Historically, child stars have often not fared that well after bursts of fame in the media industries; viral kids need more successful and more carefully mapped trajectories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Further Resources<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>While we are currently ushering our paper into publication, here are a few more links on the topic that might be useful:<br><br>Slides from our talk <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/tamaleaver\/status\/1050408556355305475\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Tweet summary of our key slides <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/wishcrys\/status\/1050408443272671232\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Abstract in video form <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/0B4hAR5y6WjXXRU13Nm1QbnpSLU0\/view\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Radio interview <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/radionational\/programs\/lifematters\/viral-kids-youtube-instagram-micro-celebrities\/8886520\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Tama&#8217;s work on &#8216;Intimate Surveillance&#8217; <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/2056305117707192\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Crystal&#8217;s work on &#8216;Family Influencers&#8217; <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.1177\/2056305117707191\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Pop media version of our work <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/when-exploiting-kids-for-cash-goes-wrong-on-youtube-the-lessons-of-daddyofive-76932\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<br>Twitter thread + reading list on the history of child influencers <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/wishcrys\/status\/1121091004310773761\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Dr Crystal Abidin is a socio-cultural anthropologist of vernacular internet cultures, particularly young people\u2019s relationships with internet celebrity, self-curation, and vulnerability. She is Senior Research Fellow and ARC DECRA Fellow in Internet Studies at Curtin University. Her books include <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/books.emeraldinsight.com\/page\/detail\/Internet-Celebrity\/?k=9781787560796\" target=\"_blank\">Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online<\/a> (Emerald Publishing, 2018), <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/wishcrys.com\/microcelebrity-around-the-globe-emerald\/\" target=\"_blank\">Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to Cultures of Internet Fame<\/a> (co-edited with Megan Lindsay Brown, Emerald Publishing, 2018), and <a href=\"https:\/\/wishcrys.com\/instagram-polity\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures<\/a> (with Tama Leaver and Tim Highfield, Polity Press, December 2019). Reach her at <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/wishcrys.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">wishcrys.com<\/a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/wishcrys\" target=\"_blank\">@wishcrys<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Social Media Famous Children In light of recent discussions around the rights of social media famous children, where various journalists and scholars are calling for more accountability from influencer parents, social media platforms, and everyday audiences, my collaborator A\/Prof Tama Leaver and I would like to share some snippets from our paper-in-progress regarding the networked [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2067,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9967],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2067"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23910"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24275,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23910\/revisions\/24275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}