{"id":21949,"date":"2016-11-23T08:00:44","date_gmt":"2016-11-23T12:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/?p=21949"},"modified":"2016-11-23T10:11:05","modified_gmt":"2016-11-23T14:11:05","slug":"21949","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/2016\/11\/23\/21949\/","title":{"rendered":"Preparing for Thursday: Some Tips on Arguing about Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"turkey3\"<\/a><\/p>\n

A couple of years ago I wrote about Friendsgiving<\/a>, that very special holiday where cash-strapped millennials gather around a dietary-restriction-labeled potluck table and make social space for their politics and life experiences under late capitalism. All still very relevant, though I suspect this is the year where we should come up with a name for whatever happens after late capitalism. Some of you, of course, will be sharing a table with people not of your own choosing and so you might be forced into reckoning with people who make excuses for Nazis and disagree that trans people exist.<\/p>\n

What follows are a couple of useful tactics that will help you hold your own and get through arguments that we shouldn\u2019t have to keep having but here we are. These probably will not help you in\u00a0a completely hostile room. These are better if you\u2019re in a mixed crowd and you want to make sure that at the end of the political argument people don\u2019t leave saying nothing more than \u201cpolitics is so divisive!\u201d People only criticize divisiveness when they aren\u2019t sufficiently convinced by one side.<\/p>\n

Above all, remember that political arguments are not about decisions based on different information, they are rooted\u00a0deeply-held beliefs about\u00a0how the world works\u00a0that we are slowly socialized into. No single\u00a0conversation will undo a social world.<\/strong>\u00a0Campaigns (including these last two) know that most of their voters are \u201clow information\u201d voters who are not fluent in, or even persuaded by, long and involved explanations of policy. The mistake here is to assume that this is because most people are stupid and if you\u2019re not basing your political positions on exhaustive research you don\u2019t deserve to have tightly-held beliefs. This is a deeply condescending and unproductive position. Instead of delivering correctives like a walking, talking vox.com article, try to get to the bottom of what your debate opponents\u2019 politics represent. If it is a general sense of declining American prosperity, agree with them! But then redirect the conversation away from race-baiting and lament any candidate\u2019s ability to put forward a plan that would work for most people. Sometimes it helps to encourage someone to spin out their argument until it reaches an internally illogical conclusion like I did here<\/a>. Depending on the situation, ask questions, challenge basic assumptions, or offer an alternative framing for the topic at hand. Which reminds me\u2026<\/p>\n

Understand Framing. <\/strong>No idea stands alone. Rather, concepts and ideas are interconnected and cannot be utilized without some unexpected or unwanted baggage. Framing is not just how ideas are presented, but what parts of an argument automatically feed into other arguments that the speaker is not intending to make. If you fall into an argument about how <\/em>to make the country safer, for example, you are not talking about how most crimes tallied by the FBI\u2019s Uniform Crime Reporting Statistics<\/a> are at historic lows. (Same story with immigration.) Also, be sure to notice when you\u2019ve started using someone else\u2019s conceptual metaphor. If you talk about \u201ctrade wars\u201d you have entered a conversation where trade is war. This means you\u2019re trapped into talking about trade in terms of winners and losers who are determined through cut-throat violence. Try to reframe the conversation by talking about trade in a less combative way. Check out this handy list of conceptual metaphors<\/a> to help you get familiar with conceptual metaphors.<\/p>\n

Resist well-meaning people who want a reason \u201cto hope that he succeeds in making the country great.\u201d <\/strong>There is some sophisticated framing going on when someone parrots this line like a CNN talking head. The office doesn\u2019t \u201cmake the man\u201d and there are no checks and balances in place to make sure Trump is tempered by more level-headed people. The executive branch has never been more powerful and we have both parties to thank for that. Trump, for all his outsider status, has never made claims to devolving the power of the President. Don\u2019t even argue about the Republican-held Congress and the soon-to-be 5-4 conservative Supreme Court. Instead, talk about all the ways Obama has strengthened the executive branch by embracing the Bush administration\u2019s love of signing statements<\/a>. Talk about how powerful the president has gotten in the last two decades and even if you like Trump he\u2019s (hopefully?) not going to be president forever and someone will inherit the more-powerful position he\u2019s helped create. There is nothing normal about this president and there are no counter-vailing forces within government powerful enough to correct the ship.<\/p>\n

Reasonableness is so, so delicious. Everyone wants to be the reasonable one. <\/strong>Notice when the conversation turns toward what is reasonable, actionable, or realistic. This is a sign that someone is trying to do an end run around the very basis of your argument. They don\u2019t want to engage in the substance of what you are saying and are more concerned with how reasonable and calm they appear to others. Britney Summit-Gil has more:<\/a><\/p>\n

And if everyone at every interaction in their life is performing a self with the purpose of affecting another person, this holds true for left, right, and center. But for moderates, for white people, for the \u201creasonables,\u201d there is little cost. Of all of the people I\u2019ve seen calling for us to be reasonable, they are those least likely to be affected by a Trump administration. I have yet to see an immigrant, a person of color, a gay or trans person make this kind of call, though I am sure there are exceptions. But based on what I have seen, disenfranchised and targeted populations are calling for resistance, not unity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Put the onus on Trump supporters to explain why we should ignore Nazi\u2019s loud support for him, and \u201cjust give the guy a chance.\u201d <\/strong>This is probably where the most aggressive confrontation must take place. Keep Trumpists on the defense by explaining why they think Nazi\u2019s would be excited about this administration and what the administration plans to do to materially curb the power and prominence of these organizations (not just distance themselves from their most vocal avatars). Most likely you\u2019ll be met with an argument about how these organizations are being given excess attention by the media and this is not representative of the Trump administration. Here you could agree that this isn\u2019t totally unprecedented given that Reagan enjoyed endorsements from white supremacists, and a healthy handful of Republican primary candidates were supported by and shared a stage with a pastor that openly called for the execution of gay people. You could even bring up the fact that many white supremacist organizations celebrated Obama\u2019s victory<\/a>, albeit for very different reasons. After making that point, criticize Trump as not doing enough to overcome the problem that he\u2019s nonetheless faced with. Above anything though, keep the focus on what Trump must do to deal with the seeming threat of Nazis regardless of whether that thread is manufactured by the media or not.<\/p>\n

Stay away from talking about Trump in ableist terms. <\/strong>You might even surprise a few people by briefly, seemingly defending Trump. Stop anyone who is (still!) talking about Trump\u2019s hand size<\/a> or how \u201ctotally crazy\u201d he is<\/a> and instead keep focus on what he has said, done, and apparently believes. This is all that matters.<\/p>\n

David is on Twitter<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Image source is this site<\/a> that explains the significance of animals in your dreams.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A couple of years ago I wrote about Friendsgiving, that very special holiday where cash-strapped millennials gather around a dietary-restriction-labeled potluck table and make social space for their politics and life experiences under late capitalism. All still very relevant, though I suspect this is the year where we should come up with a name for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1512,"featured_media":21950,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9967],"tags":[36395,43070,85,2086,36392],"class_list":["post-21949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","tag-2016-election","tag-arguments","tag-politics","tag-thanksgiving","tag-trump"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2016\/11\/turkey3.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21949"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21949\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21953,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21949\/revisions\/21953"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}