{"id":1819,"date":"2011-05-05T13:24:13","date_gmt":"2011-05-05T17:24:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/?p=1819"},"modified":"2011-11-20T16:21:59","modified_gmt":"2011-11-20T20:21:59","slug":"why-journals-are-the-dinosaurs-of-academia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/2011\/05\/05\/why-journals-are-the-dinosaurs-of-academia\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Journals are the Dinosaurs of Academia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Montanoceratops_skeleton.jpg\"><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2011\/03\/dinosaur.jpg\"><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2011\/03\/dinosaur2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1826\" src=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2011\/03\/dinosaur2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"221\" srcset=\"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2011\/03\/dinosaur2.jpg 600w, https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/files\/2011\/03\/dinosaur2-300x122.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nAnswer: They wield enormous (and terrifying) power, yet\u00a0 they are ill-adapted to function in a changing environment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In most corners of society, it&#8217;s a become a trope to say that the Internet has changed everything; but online communication is still far from integrated into the norms and practices of the academy, whose pace of change and adaptation is nothing less than glacial.\u00a0 Anyone familiar with academic careers knows that conventional (read <em>print<\/em>) journal publications are the be-all end-all criterion in evaluating potential hires\u2014the meaning behind the well-worn clich\u00e9: &#8220;publish or perish.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The practice of using journal articles as the sole criterion in evaluating an academic&#8217;s productivity is an artifact of an epoch long-passed.\u00a0 In the age of the printing press, journals were, by far, the most efficient and enduring form of communication.\u00a0 They enabled disciplines to have thoughtful conversations spanning decades and continents.\u00a0 They also facilitated the transmission of the knowledge produced through these conversations to younger generations.\u00a0 In fact, it is nearly impossible to imagine the emergence of Modern science without existence of this medium. Thus, in the beginning, journals become symbolically and ritually important <em>because<\/em> they were functionally necessary. (While journals were medium <em>du jour<\/em> during Durkheim&#8217;s productive years, he surely would have recognized the reason behind their status in the cult of the academic.)<!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Today, academia finds itself in a state of hysteresis (\u00e0 la Bourdieu); that is say, our habits have become maladapted to the field or environment in which they are performed.\u00a0 Let us consider recent developments in the nature of academic discourse. Fifty years ago, the democratization of commercial flight made face-to-face communication between professionals in various disciplines a reality.\u00a0 Conferences becomes a more rapid and efficient method of communicating ideas\u2014but, this form communication was not durable.\u00a0 Thus, the conference proceeding emerged as a supplementary medium to compensate for the shortcomings of face-to-face communication.\u00a0 In some younger or more progressive disciplines, proceedings have been elevated to a status akin to that journals.\u00a0 These proceedings are printed, circulated, and come to occupy the shelves of offices and libraries across country, if not the world.\u00a0 And, for many decades, this was the only way to transmit and store the content of conferences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In the proceeding two decades, however, the practical justifications for the production of <em>print <\/em>journals or conference proceedings has evaporated in light of the Internet&#8217;s emergence.\u00a0 These vestigial organs of the academy <em>should have<\/em> slowly withered away, becoming fossilized in archives. Yet, print media remain firmly entrenched, retaining all their symbolic significance, while lacking any of their earlier practical import.\u00a0 Our cult-like worship of print media is far from benign; the privileging of the print over the digital, in fact, has the opposite effect than was originally intended.\u00a0 Instead of facilitating the rapid dissemination of ideas, it hinders it.\u00a0 Print is a solid, heavy medium (as Bauman explains); it travels slowly and is expensive to reproduce.\u00a0 Digital information is liquid and light; it travels instantaneously and is free to reproduce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">It would be superficial, however, to simply criticize print article (and to promote digital articles).\u00a0 The article itself an artifact of print media and native to that form.\u00a0 There ought to be a debate within the academy that seriously considers whether the article optimally utilizes the potential of digital platforms.\u00a0 Are there more effective, indigenously digital mode of communication?\u00a0 Is the article a undead corpse, reanimated to inhabit the digital realm?\u00a0 Of course, this is a loaded question\u2014no doubt exaggerated by the fact that the medium currently in use is an indigenously digital blog, not an article.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em>De facto<\/em>, academics in every discipline are utilizing blogs, Twitter, video, and other &#8220;new media&#8221; to communicate their ideas (and, incidentally, to communicate them to much wider\u2014read interdisciplinary and lay\u2014audiences). <em>De jure<\/em>, however, we still valorize the article, particularly, the print article.\u00a0 Who\/what suffers? Young academics, socially-active academics, the quality of conversation within the academy, and any layperson or lay-community who stands benefit from the fruits of academic knowledge.\u00a0 Who benefits? Those entrenched in the old system, whose habits are better suited to yesteryear and who still have sufficient power to resist within the academy to resist any change in the standards of evaluation.\u00a0 What can we do?\u00a0 It&#8217;s time for the a younger generation and those on the outside to fight our way on to hiring committees.\u00a0 It&#8217;s time for us to establish a unified agenda that involves developing more expansive and inclusive criteria for evaluation.\u00a0 It&#8217;s time (as Patricia Hill Collins once said) to leverage our power as &#8220;outsiders within&#8221;\u2014to learn to function, even thrive, within the system as we systematically work to reform it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em>Follow PJ Rey on Twitter: <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/#%21\/pjrey\" target=\"_blank\">@pjrey<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Answer: They wield enormous (and terrifying) power, yet\u00a0 they are ill-adapted to function in a changing environment. In most corners of society, it&#8217;s a become a trope to say that the Internet has changed everything; but online communication is still far from integrated into the norms and practices of the academy, whose pace of change [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":563,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9967],"tags":[10658,584,2674,2876,10651,3225,1621,10652,3884],"class_list":["post-1819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","tag-commentary-tags-blogs","tag-digital-media","tag-emile-durkheim","tag-hysteresis","tag-journals","tag-patricia-hill-collins","tag-pierre-bourdieu","tag-print-media","tag-zygmunt-bauman"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/563"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1819"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2681,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions\/2681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/cyborgology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}