{"id":217,"date":"2008-12-01T12:54:38","date_gmt":"2008-12-01T18:54:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/?p=217"},"modified":"2008-12-01T12:54:54","modified_gmt":"2008-12-01T18:54:54","slug":"twitter-and-the-control-of-interfaces-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/2008\/12\/01\/twitter-and-the-control-of-interfaces-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Twitter, Facebook and the Control of Interfaces &amp; Data"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/radar.oreilly.com\/2008\/11\/why-i-like-twitter.html\">Tim O&#8217;Reilly saying interesting things about Twitter<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nIn many ways, <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?client=firefox-a&amp;id=poFQAAAAMAAJ&amp;dq=unix+programming+environment&amp;q=simple+tools&amp;pgis=1#search\">Twitter is a re-incarnation of the old Unix philosophy of simple, cooperating tools<\/a>. The essence of Twitter is its constraints, the things it doesn&#8217;t do, and the way that its core services aren&#8217;t bound to a particular interface.<\/p>\n<p>It strikes me that many of the programs that become enduring platforms have these same characteristics. Few people use the old TCP\/IP-based applications like telnet and ftp any more, but TCP\/IP itself is ubiquitous. No one uses the mail program any more, but all of us still use email. No one uses Tim Berners-Lee&#8217;s original web server and browser any more. Both were superseded by independent programs that used his core innovations: http and html.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s different, of course, is that Twitter isn&#8217;t just a protocol. It&#8217;s also a database. And that&#8217;s the old secret of Web 2.0, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=data+is+the+intel+inside&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a\">Data is the Intel Inside<\/a>. That means that they can let go of controlling the interface. The more other people build on Twitter, the better their position becomes.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>O&#8217;Reilly also talks about how a large number of Twitter users use Twitter to update their Facebook status, which is exactly what I do. In fact, if you just look at my Facebook page, it looks like I&#8217;m fairly active on Facebook, until you realize that almost every thing in my profile is pulled into Facebook from other services like Twitter or this blog (<a href=\"http:\/\/wordpress.org\/extend\/plugins\/wordbook\/\">via Wordbook<\/a>). Thanks to the demise of Scrabulous, I pretty much only go to Facebook any more to approve friend requests and respond to people who comment on my Twitter status inside of Facebook instead of in Twitter. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure what a Facebook that tried to untie its data from its interface like O&#8217;Reilly recommends would look like though. But an even more interesting thought experiment is this: what about a Facebook-like social networking system that works like <a href=\"http:\/\/laconi.ca\">laconi.ca<\/a>, a Twitter-like piece of software where the data itself is decentralized on individual instances of the software but where the social networking &amp; communication can occur across each instance. This gets around both the centralization of interface, but also the centralization of data, which is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.webmonkey.com\/blog\/Richard_Stallman_Warns_of_the_Dangers_in__Cloud_Computing_\">really a much bigger problem<\/a>!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tim O&#8217;Reilly saying interesting things about Twitter: In many ways, Twitter is a re-incarnation of the old Unix philosophy of simple, cooperating tools. The essence of Twitter is its constraints, the things it doesn&#8217;t do, and the way that its core services aren&#8217;t bound to a particular interface. It strikes me that many of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[184,763],"class_list":["post-217","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-twitter","tag-web-20"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":219,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217\/revisions\/219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/contech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}