{"id":492,"date":"2009-02-02T08:50:30","date_gmt":"2009-02-02T14:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/crawler\/?p=492"},"modified":"2009-02-02T08:50:30","modified_gmt":"2009-02-02T14:50:30","slug":"the-greater-impact-of-layoffs-on-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/2009\/02\/02\/the-greater-impact-of-layoffs-on-men\/","title":{"rendered":"the greater impact of layoffs on men"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Worried\"<\/a>The New York Times<\/a> recently ran a piece entitled “Why the Sting of Layoffs Can Be Sharper for Men,” in which they look into how job loss may affect men differently – with a greater negative impact – than women.<\/p>\n

Psychiatrists and family therapists establish the claim that men are more adversely affected by job loss…<\/p>\n

Dr. Louann Brizendine, author of \u201cThe Female Brain\u201d and a psychiatrist at the University of California, San Francisco, says that women who lose their jobs \u201caren\u2019t going to take as much of a self-esteem hit\u201d as men. That is because the most potent form of positive social feedback for many men comes from within the hierarchy of the workplace. By contrast, she said, women may have \u201cmany sources of self-esteem \u2014 such as their relationships with other people \u2014 that are not exclusively embedded within their jobs.\u201d<\/p>\n

She said that over the past six months, her clinic has had an increase in the number of men seeking help for difficulties related to job loss.<\/p>\n

Terrence Real, a family therapist and the founder of Real Relational Solutions in Arlington, Mass., said the difference in reactions could be explained by the idea of performance esteem.<\/p>\n

\u201cEveryone who has written about male psychology has acknowledged that men base their sense of self on the maxim that \u2018I have worth because of what I do,\u2019\u00a0\u201d Mr. Real said. The feeling is that \u201cyou are only as good as your last game or your last job,\u201d he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But research by two sociologists suggests an interesting nuance in this observed trend…<\/p>\n

YET while men may appear to reel more socially and psychologically from job loss, they fare far better when it comes to re-employment.<\/p>\n

In a 2002 study, two sociology professors at Wichita State University, Charles S. Koeber and David W. Wright, found that women who were laid off and went on to look for another job were re-employed less often than men in the same position. This was especially the case if the women were married, had previously held a part-time job or had worked in something other than a highly skilled, white-collar job.<\/p>\n

The implication, Professor Koeber says, is that women have more of a burden than men to show their commitment to a job after a layoff.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt looks like employers systematically apply some criteria to women that they don\u2019t to men who are looking for jobs after being laid off,\u201d Professor Koeber said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read more<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The New York Times recently ran a piece entitled “Why the Sting of Layoffs Can Be Sharper for Men,” in which they look into how job loss may affect men differently – with a greater negative impact – than women. Psychiatrists and family therapists establish the claim that men are more adversely affected by job […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39074],"tags":[39114,143,117,76],"class_list":["post-492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sightings","tag-gender","tag-labor","tag-trends","tag-work"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=492"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":495,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492\/revisions\/495"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}