{"id":1899,"date":"2010-08-31T20:32:16","date_gmt":"2010-09-01T01:32:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/citings\/?p=1899"},"modified":"2010-08-31T20:32:16","modified_gmt":"2010-09-01T01:32:16","slug":"the-great-baby-bust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/2010\/08\/31\/the-great-baby-bust\/","title":{"rendered":"The Great Baby Bust"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"img-link\" title=\"Creative Commons licensed photo by katieharbath on flickr.com\" href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/9096412@N03\/4944513053\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"border: 0pt none;margin: 10px\" src=\"http:\/\/farm5.static.flickr.com\/4081\/4944513053_555e14c5bf_m.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Baby feet!\" width=\"240\" height=\"171\" \/><\/a>The birth rate in the United States hasn&#8217;t been this low in 100 years, leading social scientists to speculate on the role the Great Recession might be playing in family planning. The<a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20100828\/ap_on_he_me\/us_med_birth_decline\"> Associated Press <\/a>reports:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The birth rate dropped for the second year in a row since the recession began in 2007. Births fell 2.6 percent last year even as the population grew, numbers released Friday by the National Center for Health Statistics show.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a good-sized decline for one year. Every month is showing a decline from the year before,&#8221; said Stephanie Ventura, the demographer who oversaw the report.<\/p>\n<p>The birth rate, which takes into account changes in the population, fell to 13.5 births for every 1,000 people last year. That&#8217;s down from 14.3 in 2007 and way down from 30 in 1909, when it was common for people to have big families.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A sociologist explains how the falling Dow might relate to declining birth rates:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;When the economy is bad and people are uncomfortable about their  financial future, they tend to postpone having children. We saw that in  the Great Depression the 1930s and we&#8217;re seeing that in the Great  Recession today,&#8221; said Andrew Cherlin, a sociology professor at Johns  Hopkins University.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It could take a few years to turn this around,&#8221; he added.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>The birth rate dipped below 20 per 1,000 people in 1932 and did not rise above that level until the early 1940s. Recent recessions, in 1981-82, 1990-91 and 2001, all were followed by small dips in the birth rate, according to CDC figures.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Despite this trend, there is no need to panic.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Cherlin said the U.S. birth rate &#8220;is still higher than the birth rate in many wealthy countries and we also have many immigrants entering the country. So we do not need to be worried yet about a birth dearth&#8221; that would crimp the nation&#8217;s ability to take care of its growing elderly population.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The birth rate in the United States hasn&#8217;t been this low in 100 years, leading social scientists to speculate on the role the Great Recession might be playing in family planning. The Associated Press reports: The birth rate dropped for the second year in a row since the recession began in 2007. Births fell 2.6 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":335,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39074],"tags":[35,135,36,131,70,122,117],"class_list":["post-1899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sightings","tag-children","tag-demography","tag-economics","tag-economy","tag-family","tag-lifecourse","tag-trends"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/335"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1899"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1899\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1902,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1899\/revisions\/1902"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/clippings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}