{"id":333,"date":"2015-08-03T02:00:52","date_gmt":"2015-08-03T02:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/families\/?p=333"},"modified":"2015-08-03T02:00:52","modified_gmt":"2015-08-03T02:00:52","slug":"planned-parenthood-prime-target","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/2015\/08\/03\/planned-parenthood-prime-target\/","title":{"rendered":"Religious Right\u2019s Grip on Republican Party Makes Planned Parenthood a Prime Target"},"content":{"rendered":"

Originally published on <\/em>RH Reality Check<\/a>.<\/p>\n

As reproductive politics are once again consumed by an attack on Planned Parenthood, it is worth stepping back and<\/p>\n

\"Credit:<\/a>
Credit: Charlotte Cooper\/ctrouper on Flickr, under Creative Commons (CC BY 2.0).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

asking why this organization is so particularly reviled by the anti-choice movement. This is a demonization that goes well beyond the shady outfit, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), that organized the latest undercover filming, or its affiliated group<\/a>, Live Action, infamous for releasing other debunked videos over the last decade. True, Planned Parenthood was reportedly not CMP\u2019s only target, but the videos taken of its physicians have been the only ones to be released. Some Congressional Republicans, we now know, had prior knowledge<\/a> of these videos, and predictably have issued calls<\/a> for an investigation of the organization, joined by various Republican presidential aspirants. The videos have also given new ammunition to Republicans\u2019 annual efforts to withhold all funds<\/a> from Planned Parenthood for Title X services (primarily contraception and cancer screenings), which are subject to a yearly review. In short, the puzzle is why a national health-care organization\u2014in which, as its spokespersons repeatedly point out, abortion only comprises 3 percent of all services delivered<\/a>\u2014is such a prime target<\/a> of abortion opponents.<\/p>\n

One answer, of course, is size: Even if only 3 percent of its services are abortion, Planned Parenthood still performs a healthy share of all the procedures occurring in the United States. But the answer goes well beyond that. It speaks to an interesting historical split among Republicans over matters of reproduction and sexuality\u2014and the eventual triumph of the most socially conservative wing among the party base.<\/p>\n

Before it became seemingly mandatory<\/a> for Republican political figures to condemn Planned Parenthood, many were enthusiastic supporters<\/a>. In a step that would be unheard of today, Dwight D. Eisenhower, a former Republican president, agreed in 1965 to to co-chair<\/a> an honorary Planned Parenthood board along with Harry Truman, a former Democratic president. The conservative icon Barry Goldwater and his wife, Peggy, were stalwart supporters of the Planned Parenthood chapter in Arizona. Sen. Prescott Bush was a strong advocate of the organization and of contraceptive services in general, as was his son, George H.W. Bush, during his time as a Texas congressman<\/a>, though the latter had to renounce his support in order to become acceptable as a vice-presidential candidate for Ronald Reagan in 1980 (who himself had some years earlier signed a bill<\/a> liberalizing abortion in California). Mitt Romney, who famously said in the 2012 presidential campaign that he would \u201cget rid\u201d of Planned Parenthood<\/a>, had attended a fundraiser for the organization with his wife some years earlier, where she had made a donation<\/a>. And of course it was a Republican president, Richard Nixon, who in 1970 signed into law the aforementioned Title X, the nation\u2019s only legislation specifically for family planning services. Planned Parenthood became a significant grantee of this new program.<\/p>\n

To be sure, this mainstream conservative support for Planned Parenthood’s widespread ability to provide contraceptives was not always rooted in the best of motives. The field of family planning has always contained contradictory impulses of population control<\/a> as well as women\u2019s liberation, and some of the early supporters of Planned Parenthood were involved with the eugenics movement that was prominent in the first part of the 20th century. Later, the disproportionate location of Title X clinics (some associated with Planned Parenthood) in Black areas shortly after the bill was passed, along with the history of racism and classism in many arenas of medical care, created a lingering distrust of the organization in some sectors of that community, on which the anti-abortion movement has long tried to capitalize<\/a>. Prominent Black leaders, however, including Martin Luther King Jr. (who accepted Planned Parenthood\u2019s first Margaret Sanger Award in 1966) supported the organization<\/a> and were, as King put it, “sympathetic” with its “total work.”<\/p>\n

The real hardcore animosity toward the organization that lasts to this day, though, has its roots in the emergence of the religious right as a force in Republican politics in the 1970s. As a fundraising appeal of an anti-abortion group put it<\/a> in 1980, \u201cPlanned Parenthood promotes sexual perversion, homosexuality, pornography, abortion, family destruction, population control.\u201d As the quote makes clear, far more than Planned Parenthood\u2019s connection with abortion caused such wrath. The organization\u2019s provision of contraception and its commitment to offering confidential services to teenagers<\/a>, both made possible through its Title X funding, have been particularly enraging to sexual conservatives. Though abortion may have served as the \u201cbattering ram,\u201d<\/a> as Rosalind Petchesky aptly put it, to mobilize the religious right, in fact, conservative groups oppose all sexuality that does not take place within heterosexual marriage in order to procreate.<\/p>\n

Because of its size and history as a recipient of public funding, Planned Parenthood, of course, serves as a useful symbol of an enabler of out-of-control sexual behavior. Contraception\u2019s brief moment of acting as \u201ccommon ground\u201d between abortion supporters and opponents shortly after the Roe<\/em> decision in 1973 broke down as the religious right gained strength throughout the 1970s and beyond; the religious right increasingly began to frame<\/a> contraception as “supportive of the abortion mentality” rather than as something that prevented abortion.<\/p>\n

It is too soon to tell what the political fallout will be from this latest attack on Planned Parenthood. Right now, there are two competing narratives about this incident. There is that of CMP and its political allies, which attempts to convince the public that Planned Parenthood is \u201cselling\u201d fetal tissue, in spite of clear evidence<\/a>, even on the edited tapes, that this is not the case; and that of Planned Parenthood, which is that the undercover operatives used unethical<\/a> and illegal<\/a> means to promote lies about the organization\u2019s practices. (A third narrative that this case could<\/em> have evoked is disappointingly missing thus far\u2014scientists testifying to the importance of research using fetal tissue and the social good that donation by abortion patients represents). Anti-abortionists\u2019 efforts to use Planned Parenthood as a wedge issue in the 2012 election cycle were a dismal failure; analysts acknowledge that the organization\u2019s support of Obama<\/a>, symbolized by the high visibility of Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood\u2019s telegenic president, at campaign events, was a plus. Thus far, polling data<\/a> have not shown any appreciable drop in support for Planned Parenthood as a result of the videos, and most Americans continue to support the organization, which at least one in five U.S. women<\/a> will visit at some point.<\/p>\n

How U.S. residents will ultimately come to view this controversy\u2014that is, which of the two competing narratives mentioned above will prevail\u2014might be an interesting test case of whether the realities of people\u2019s sexual and reproductive lives in the 21st century are making the religious right an increasingly irrelevant force, in spite of its current hold on Republican politicians.<\/p>\n

Carole Joffe<\/a> <\/em> is a professor at the Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health at the University of California, San Francisco, professor emerita of sociology at U.C. Davis, and the author of <\/em>Dispatches from the Abortion Wars: The Costs of Fanaticism to Doctors, Patients and the Rest of Us, and co-editor, with Jennifer Reich, of <\/em>Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Originally published on RH Reality Check. As reproductive politics are once again consumed by an attack on Planned Parenthood, it is worth stepping back and asking why this organization is so particularly reviled by the anti-choice movement. This is a demonization that goes well beyond the shady outfit, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1903,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[8959,38587,371,27708],"class_list":["post-333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-families","tag-planned-parenthood","tag-policy","tag-reproductive-health"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1903"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}