{"id":2558,"date":"2021-08-10T07:07:34","date_gmt":"2021-08-10T12:07:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/?p=2558"},"modified":"2021-08-09T19:25:31","modified_gmt":"2021-08-10T00:25:31","slug":"light-skin-as-marriage-currency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/2021\/08\/10\/light-skin-as-marriage-currency\/","title":{"rendered":"Light Skin as Marriage Currency"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Image by Nicolas DEBRAY<\/a> from Pixabay<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Reposted<\/em> with permission from the Gender & Society Blog<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Black Lives Matter, the anti-racist movement that spread globally after the tragic death of George Floyd on May 2020 in the US, had an unintended but very welcome consequence in India: national debate on India\u2019s deep-rooted and highly gendered practice of color discrimination.<\/p>\n

Calls for racial justice around the world resonated with dark-skinned Indians who face colorism, or dark-skin prejudice, in their everyday lives. The backlash forced skin-whitening multinational companies, which rake in an annual revenue of $500 million, to change the names of skin-lightening products.<\/p>\n

Growing up in North India as the daughter of a fair-hued mother and dark-skinned father, \u00a0the prejudice of colorism was intimate. \u00a0Accustomed to hearing \u201cthank god she is \u2018wheatish\u2019 in complexion. Imagine if she had inherited her father\u2019s dark skin,\u201d I would then wait for the anticipated dramatic pause from a well-meaning relative or friend of my mother as they assessed me on the color hierarchy. We were all expected to shudder at the imagined future horrors from which \u00a0my \u201cwheatish\u201d skin had saved me.\u00a0 One such possible horror \u00a0was rejection by appropriate suitors when I became of marriageable age.<\/p>\n

Fast forward with me to a few decades to a village in rural West Bengal in east India. I was conducting a study on a new trend of marriage migration in North India that involved men sourcing brides from remote corners of India. Most homes of prospective, poor, marriageable women that I visited had tubes of frequently used skin-whitening creams lying alongside combs and bindis on the ledges of plastic mirrors hung on walls. Dark-hued young women admitted using these creams to gain favourable marriage prospects and lower dowry demands from local suitors.<\/p>\n

Despite the vast majority of India\u2019s people being dark-skinned, the obsession with fair skin dates back historically to the oppressive and exploitative caste system of the Hindus. Fairness is linked to higher caste status, while a darker hue is seen as a feature of\u00a0 the low caste and those who do menial labor.<\/p>\n

Colorism is starkly visible \u00a0in India\u2019s arranged marriage market. Fairness of prospective brides is highly prized and newsprint or e-matrimonial advertisements use \u201cfair complexioned\u201d as a desired trait to filter out darker-hued women. In India, global capital has leveraged this national obsession to its advantage by marketing skin-bleaching products as an antidote to matrimonial hurdles.<\/p>\n

THE RESEARCH<\/h2>\n

In my recently published research article in\u00a0Gender & Society<\/em>, I show that\u00a0<\/a>colorism is foundational to a new form of gendered violence for dark-skinned poor women. Skin fairness emerges as pivotal marriage capital and diminishes the chances of dark-complexioned poor Dalit (a politically self-aware term for untouchable castes) women to marry in their own communities.<\/p>\n

I conducted interviews across 57 villages in the North and East Indian provinces of Haryana, Rajasthan, West Bengal, and Odisha. My interviews and focus groups with women and men in such marriages, their families, and villagers have revealed that light skin operates as a \u201ccurrency\u201d tradeable for a lesser dowry. North Indian bachelors, faced with a bride deficit due to the sex selective abortion of female fetuses, have begun traveling across the breadth of India to deliberately \u201csource\u201d wives from remote corners of the country. They offer the carrot of \u201cno dowry and all wedding expenses paid\u201d to poor families with darker-hued daughters of marriageable age. This results in women entering colorism-coerced marriage with rural North Indian men. This colorism-coerced marriage migration leads to a lifetime of cultural exile and internal othering in their marital homes and communities.<\/p>\n

MARRIED LIFE SHAPED BY COLORISM<\/h3>\n

This oppressive skin-tone bias haunts such migrant brides as married women. \u00a0They have fewer fallback options due to distance from their parents and they must contend with their lack of ability to bargain about their own labor with their new conjugal families.\u00a0Out of 113 interviewed brides,<\/a>\u00a057 told me that their husband and his family used dark-skin shaming to discipline them into docility and compliance whenever they resisted demands for excessive work.<\/p>\n

These women face forcible cultural assimilation in North India, where the culture, language, customs, food habits, and even physical environment is different from their own. Caste discrimination within the family and in the community ranges from caste slurs, exclusion from family and kin gatherings, and segregation because of perceived untouchability. North Indian ethnocentrism, a peculiar blend of ethnic chauvinism, caste discrimination, and colorism directed specifically against east Indians from the provinces of Bihar and West Bengal, exacerbates the stigmatization of dark-hued migrant brides. Their very identity gets invested with connotations of crime, filth, savagery, and dim-wittedness, exposing them to ridicule and hate. My study also revealed that ethnocentric hate extends intergenerationally to the women\u2019s children.<\/p>\n

WE MUST \u201cOUT\u201d THIS NEW FORM OF GENDERED VIOLENCE<\/h3>\n

It is important to understand how new forms of gendered violence emerge for poor women in contemporary society. Such gendered violence builds patriarchy and caste oppression. Colorism creates a situation ripe for marriage brokers and traffickers to take advantage of poor women\u2019s vulnerability. Societal pressure to marry off adult daughters renders poor parents gullible in the face of such offers and they often fail to check the prospective groom\u2019s background, consigning their daughters to a lifetime of misery.<\/p>\n

Multinational companies aggressively peddle feminine skin fairness as \u201cmarriage capital\u201d to drive up the sales of their skin-bleaching products. The seductive narrative of a better life outcome has an estimated 60\u201365 percent of India\u2019s women between 16 and 35 years of age using skin bleaching \u00a0products. Global capital which produces and markets these products has a vested interest in keeping such discriminatory hierarchies alive as India is one of its biggest and fastest growing markets. We need to rid ourselves of skin-tone bias and disrupt profiteering by transnational capital if we want to truly dismantle colorism and ensure that this new form of gender oppression gets stamped out.<\/p>\n

Reena Kukreja\u00a0<\/strong>is Assistant Professor in the Department of Global Development Studies at Queen\u2019s University, Canada. She is cross-appointed to the Department of Gender Studies and Cultural Studies Program at Queen\u2019s University. She divides time between teaching, research, and film-making. Her forthcoming book\u00a0Partial Truths Negotiated Existences\u00a0focuses on cross-region marriage migration in India and how the neo-liberal accumulative process in India has dispossessed poor women of matrimonial choice.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reposted with permission from the Gender & Society Blog Black Lives Matter, the anti-racist movement that spread globally after the tragic death of George Floyd on May 2020 in the US, had an unintended but very welcome consequence in India: national debate on India\u2019s deep-rooted and highly gendered practice of color discrimination. Calls for racial […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2095,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2095"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2558"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2560,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2558\/revisions\/2560"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesocietypages.org\/ccf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}