When Young (1970) conceived of the meritocracy it was a satirical device to draw attention to a possible dystopian future where everyone is stratified in concrete by their I.Q.: the sub optimal intelligent condemned to a meaningless existence. The meaning of meritocracy has evolved (Allen 2011) to become a discursive device. Politicians from all major parties now clamour for the moral high ground by claiming making society more meritocratic is their political raison d’etre. The Deputy Prime Minister, for example said exactly that; “It’s the reason I do this job” (Clegg, 2012). Indeed meritocracy’s conceptual power is far reaching:
“Meritocracy as an abstract ideal is also a measure of progress, where more advanced societies are held to be those that are more meritocratic. They make fewer decisions based on prejudice and extend opportunity further. Meritocracy is sometimes used as a measure of corruption, where corrupt societies or corrupt institutions are thought to be those that disobey the formula: merit = ability + effort. Meritocratic societies are open and fair, non-meritocratic ones are obscure and underhand. Justice, social cohesion, progress, fairness and transparency, these are the timeless ideas upon which meritocracy is presumed to rest.” (Allen 2011, p2)
Yet despite the political conviction supporting the meritocracy, according to the most recent “State of the Nation” report written by the government’s Nation Social Mobility and Child Commission:
“The most talented in our society are not getting equal opportunities to access the top, which is disproportionately dominated by the most advantaged”
“Top employers recruit from an average of only 20 out of >115 universities”. (Shephard 2014)
Littler (2013) argues it is not;
“Merely a coincidence that the common idea that we live, or should live, in a meritocratic age co-exists with a pronounced lack of social mobility and the continuation of vested hereditary economic interests.” (p53)
This is because within the discourse of inequality the concept of meritocracy has been appropriated and shaped by neo-liberal ideology. For Foucault (2010), neoliberalism’s project is “the overall exercise of political power modelled on the principles of a market economy” (p131). Moreover, “the only ‘true’ aims of social policy for neoliberalism can be economic growth and privatisation; thus the multiplication of the ‘enterprise’ form within the social body” (p148). Neo-liberals want us to believe if we are sufficiently empowered, incentivised and aspirational we can and should transform or transcend our class of conditions. The responsibility to act and the blame for failure falls upon the individual. As the elite top 1% experience compound growth in their incomes:
“Entrepreneurialism and celebrity rags-to-riches tales become highlighted, or rendered ‘luminous’, they become publicly visible opportunities to ‘escape’ an otherwise entrenched position of social subordination”. (Littler 2013, p55)
So, meritocracy has transformed from a satirical device for highlighting increasing inequality to become the moral justification for neoliberalism while politicians claim to address inequality but, in effect, they only tinker with its mechanisms.
Allen, A., 2011. Michael Young’s The Rise of the Meritocracy: A Philosophical Critique. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), pp.367–382. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071005.2011.582852 [Accessed December 17, 2014].
Clegg, N., 2012. Nick Clegg’s Social Mobility Speech in Full. Politics.co.uk.
Foucault, M., 1978. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. On Neo-Liberal Governmentality, Palgrave Macmillan.
Littler, J., 2013. Meritocracy as Plutocracy: The Marketising of “Equality” Under Neoliberalism. New Formations, 80(1), pp.52–72. Available at: http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=0950-2378&volume=80&issue=1&spage=52 [Accessed December 17, 2014].
Shephard, G., 2014. State of the Nation 2014: Social Mobility and Child Poverty in Great Britain Report Summary October 2014. , (October).
Young, M., 1970. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870-2033: an Essay on Education and Equality, Penguin.