<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexual Dimorphism in the Green Spoonworm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/01/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-green-spoonworm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/01/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-green-spoonworm/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: steffi</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/01/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-green-spoonworm/comment-page-1/#comment-580972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steffi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=57307#comment-580972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see the slip. Maybe it was bad grammar. I&#039;m not a native speaker. I meant that if the sexes here were reversed, this would be considered sexist and degrading for women. 

And I meant that the males of that species are not wothless. (the &quot;they&quot; was in fact misleading). Does that make sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the slip. Maybe it was bad grammar. I&#8217;m not a native speaker. I meant that if the sexes here were reversed, this would be considered sexist and degrading for women. </p>
<p>And I meant that the males of that species are not wothless. (the &#8220;they&#8221; was in fact misleading). Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morg</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/01/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-green-spoonworm/comment-page-1/#comment-580953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=57307#comment-580953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Just imagine, the females of a species were described as &quot;basically worthless&quot;.&quot;



That was a freudian slip.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just imagine, the females of a species were described as &#8220;basically worthless&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
<p>That was a freudian slip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffi</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/01/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-green-spoonworm/comment-page-1/#comment-580949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steffi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=57307#comment-580949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the reproduction of the angler fish surely is interesting, I did not like that comic. Just imagine, the females of a species were described as &quot;basically worthless&quot;. They are not worthless. If they were they would not exist. You could interpret the same facts for example as a great sacrifice of the male to his loved one. Or just not humanize animals altogether. Especially fish. We have to stop empowering women by degrading men. And stop it now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the reproduction of the angler fish surely is interesting, I did not like that comic. Just imagine, the females of a species were described as &#8220;basically worthless&#8221;. They are not worthless. If they were they would not exist. You could interpret the same facts for example as a great sacrifice of the male to his loved one. Or just not humanize animals altogether. Especially fish. We have to stop empowering women by degrading men. And stop it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umlud</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/01/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-green-spoonworm/comment-page-1/#comment-580919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umlud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=57307#comment-580919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite example of extreme sexual dimorphism has always been the angler fish. The Oatmeal did a funny take on it a while back:

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/angler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite example of extreme sexual dimorphism has always been the angler fish. The Oatmeal did a funny take on it a while back:</p>
<p><a href="http://theoatmeal.com/comics/angler" rel="nofollow">http://theoatmeal.com/comics/angler</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
