<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Animal Abuse, Oil Leaks, and the Freedom of the Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/04/08/animal-abuse-oil-leaks-and-the-freedom-of-the-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/04/08/animal-abuse-oil-leaks-and-the-freedom-of-the-press/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: [links] Link salad recovers from chemo grogginess &#124; jlake.com</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/04/08/animal-abuse-oil-leaks-and-the-freedom-of-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-571906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[links] Link salad recovers from chemo grogginess &#124; jlake.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=54724#comment-571906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Animal Abuse, Oil Leaks, and the Freedom of the Press [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Animal Abuse, Oil Leaks, and the Freedom of the Press [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutus</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/04/08/animal-abuse-oil-leaks-and-the-freedom-of-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-571884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brutus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=54724#comment-571884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;From the surface up to 1000 feet above ground level&quot; is the flight restriction; &lt;a href=&quot;http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFar.nsf/FARSBySectLookup/91.119&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FAR part 91&lt;/a&gt; restricts flight &quot;Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any 
open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the 
highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the 
aircraft.&quot; 

Anywhere there&#039;s something to take a picture of qualifies as a congested area already, and low-flying aircraft are already prohibited except for takeoff and landing from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airport-data.com/airport/AR34/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pine Village Airport (AR34)&lt;/a&gt; a privately owned unpaved turf runway around which the flight restriction is centered. The disaster relief coordinator &lt;a&gt;Tom Suhrhoff&lt;/a&gt; who requested the restriction, has stated that exceptions will be made for news aircraft provided they don&#039;t interfere with the relief helicopter operations. In any case, typical heights for aerial photography range from 1000-2500 feet above ground level, or more in mountainous terrain.

Second, the first amendment does not grant the right for journalists to enter private property; there is no more right to enter corporate property to take pictures of the spill than there would be a right to enter a private residence wherein a crime had been committed. Obviously photojournalists have no trouble taking pictures from publicly accessible ways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From the surface up to 1000 feet above ground level&#8221; is the flight restriction; <a href="http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFar.nsf/FARSBySectLookup/91.119" rel="nofollow">FAR part 91</a> restricts flight &#8220;Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any<br />
open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the<br />
highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the<br />
aircraft.&#8221; </p>
<p>Anywhere there&#8217;s something to take a picture of qualifies as a congested area already, and low-flying aircraft are already prohibited except for takeoff and landing from <a href="http://www.airport-data.com/airport/AR34/" rel="nofollow">Pine Village Airport (AR34)</a> a privately owned unpaved turf runway around which the flight restriction is centered. The disaster relief coordinator <a>Tom Suhrhoff</a> who requested the restriction, has stated that exceptions will be made for news aircraft provided they don&#8217;t interfere with the relief helicopter operations. In any case, typical heights for aerial photography range from 1000-2500 feet above ground level, or more in mountainous terrain.</p>
<p>Second, the first amendment does not grant the right for journalists to enter private property; there is no more right to enter corporate property to take pictures of the spill than there would be a right to enter a private residence wherein a crime had been committed. Obviously photojournalists have no trouble taking pictures from publicly accessible ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
