<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Nude,&#8221; Racial Marginalization, and the Wedding Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Il privilegio di essere bianche, le mutande &#8220;color carne&#8221; e l&#8217;Orsa Daniza. – Un altro genere di comunicazione</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-593109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Il privilegio di essere bianche, le mutande &#8220;color carne&#8221; e l&#8217;Orsa Daniza. – Un altro genere di comunicazione]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-593109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Il color carne, è il colore della pelle dei bianchi di questa nostra società occidentale. Raramente un prodotto &#8220;color carne&#8221; ha una variante per tutte le carni, che sia della lingerie, dei cerotti o un abito da sposa. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Il color carne, è il colore della pelle dei bianchi di questa nostra società occidentale. Raramente un prodotto &#8220;color carne&#8221; ha una variante per tutte le carni, che sia della lingerie, dei cerotti o un abito da sposa. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amabil Crunt</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-567233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amabil Crunt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-567233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they would say &quot;white nude&quot;, I guess it would be OK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they would say &#8220;white nude&#8221;, I guess it would be OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vampie</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-564127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vampie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-564127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s at least partially because lately &#039;nude&#039;  became a description of a fashionable colour. Now everything which used to be beige or cream is &#039;nude&#039;, even in foreign languages the English word &#039;nude&#039; is copied. 

I noticed lately every seasonal colour gets a slightly unusual name, I guess to appear new and unique, except &#039;nude&#039;. Lately it was also &#039;mint&#039; and now &#039;burgundy&#039;. I think there were also &#039;tangerine&#039; and some others, though they turned out to be less popular, so you don&#039;t see the around around so much.

I think it&#039;s just one of fashion phenomenons, though unfortunately this name has a lot of unpleasant connotations. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s at least partially because lately &#8216;nude&#8217;  became a description of a fashionable colour. Now everything which used to be beige or cream is &#8216;nude&#8217;, even in foreign languages the English word &#8216;nude&#8217; is copied. </p>
<p>I noticed lately every seasonal colour gets a slightly unusual name, I guess to appear new and unique, except &#8216;nude&#8217;. Lately it was also &#8216;mint&#8217; and now &#8216;burgundy&#8217;. I think there were also &#8216;tangerine&#8217; and some others, though they turned out to be less popular, so you don&#8217;t see the around around so much.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s just one of fashion phenomenons, though unfortunately this name has a lot of unpleasant connotations. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moionfire</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-553285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moionfire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-553285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they should just say &quot;pale flesh/skin&quot; or &quot;pale nude&quot; rather than &quot;nude&quot;. It would save the fashion/retail industry a lot of trouble and yet still get the point across. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should just say &#8220;pale flesh/skin&#8221; or &#8220;pale nude&#8221; rather than &#8220;nude&#8221;. It would save the fashion/retail industry a lot of trouble and yet still get the point across. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umlud</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umlud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, I am aware that &#039;camel&#039; is a type of beige. I&#039;ve been living in the English speaking world long enough - and am facile enough with the language, have accumulated a broad vocabulary, and am sufficiently widely read in English to know that &#039;camel&#039; refers to both an animal and a color.

Second, through, you appear to misunderstand the very basis of why I&#039;m pointing out the double-standard of coloration. Therefore, I will explain it to you by asking if you are willing to extrapolate your comment to cover the point of the post? Would you say, for example, &quot;You have completely missed the point that there is a particular shade of beige called &#039;nude&#039;. That is the name of the colour. We aren&#039;t actually talking about White people here.&quot;

Or are you saying, &quot;Screw the fact that camels come in as wide an array of coloration as humans! The arbitrary color of &#039;camel&#039; is the one true color! (Even though it isn&#039;t actually a single color, but a range of shades of a color, much like &#039;nude&#039; isn&#039;t a single color but a range of shades.)&quot;

You are either being inconsistent in your argumentation, or you are - in effect - saying that camels aren&#039;t important. In addition, if you state that &#039;camel is a particular shade of beige&#039;, then you are failing in your argumentation, since it is not &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt; particular shade, much like &quot;nude&quot; isn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt; particular shade. In which case your argumentation is faulty. Furthermore, even if you were to change your argumentation to state &quot;a range of shades&quot;, your argumentation isn&#039;t representative of what camels actually &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt;, and you therefore fail in the check on reality, one leg of which is the basis of the argumentation of why &quot;nude = a shade of beige&quot; is a bad argument. (True, camels aren&#039;t a repressed human minority, but they also aren&#039;t all beige. Go to your local zoo if you think I&#039;m lying.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I am aware that &#8216;camel&#8217; is a type of beige. I&#8217;ve been living in the English speaking world long enough &#8211; and am facile enough with the language, have accumulated a broad vocabulary, and am sufficiently widely read in English to know that &#8216;camel&#8217; refers to both an animal and a color.</p>
<p>Second, through, you appear to misunderstand the very basis of why I&#8217;m pointing out the double-standard of coloration. Therefore, I will explain it to you by asking if you are willing to extrapolate your comment to cover the point of the post? Would you say, for example, &#8220;You have completely missed the point that there is a particular shade of beige called &#8216;nude&#8217;. That is the name of the colour. We aren&#8217;t actually talking about White people here.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or are you saying, &#8220;Screw the fact that camels come in as wide an array of coloration as humans! The arbitrary color of &#8216;camel&#8217; is the one true color! (Even though it isn&#8217;t actually a single color, but a range of shades of a color, much like &#8216;nude&#8217; isn&#8217;t a single color but a range of shades.)&#8221;</p>
<p>You are either being inconsistent in your argumentation, or you are &#8211; in effect &#8211; saying that camels aren&#8217;t important. In addition, if you state that &#8216;camel is a particular shade of beige&#8217;, then you are failing in your argumentation, since it is not <i>a</i> particular shade, much like &#8220;nude&#8221; isn&#8217;t <i>a</i> particular shade. In which case your argumentation is faulty. Furthermore, even if you were to change your argumentation to state &#8220;a range of shades&#8221;, your argumentation isn&#8217;t representative of what camels actually <i>are</i>, and you therefore fail in the check on reality, one leg of which is the basis of the argumentation of why &#8220;nude = a shade of beige&#8221; is a bad argument. (True, camels aren&#8217;t a repressed human minority, but they also aren&#8217;t all beige. Go to your local zoo if you think I&#8217;m lying.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Village Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to advances in polymer technology, the first truly &quot;nude&quot; clothing is now technically possible and will probably be for sale at some point. A flexible, gas-permeable translucent material with the feel of fabric can be sewn into clothing that allows one&#039;s natural skin color to show through (and can be infused with a UV inhibitor to prevent sunburn). For legal reasons the parts covering anatomical features that the law requires covered can be &quot;frosted&quot; like the glass on some shower doors. I bet it&#039;ll be a popular trend at some point and then &quot;nude&quot; will finally be a viable term for describing a piece of clothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to advances in polymer technology, the first truly &#8220;nude&#8221; clothing is now technically possible and will probably be for sale at some point. A flexible, gas-permeable translucent material with the feel of fabric can be sewn into clothing that allows one&#8217;s natural skin color to show through (and can be infused with a UV inhibitor to prevent sunburn). For legal reasons the parts covering anatomical features that the law requires covered can be &#8220;frosted&#8221; like the glass on some shower doors. I bet it&#8217;ll be a popular trend at some point and then &#8220;nude&#8221; will finally be a viable term for describing a piece of clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearls in Vinegar</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearls in Vinegar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 07:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have completely missed the point that there is a particular shade of beige called &#039;camel&#039;. That is the name of the colour. We aren&#039;t actually talking about animals here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have completely missed the point that there is a particular shade of beige called &#8216;camel&#8217;. That is the name of the colour. We aren&#8217;t actually talking about animals here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heatherleila</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heatherleila]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I think the best solution with band-aids is picking a colored or patterned kind, then you don´t even expect it to match skin. I thought of this when working at a school where most students were black and all the boxes of band-aids were that typical light fleshy color. And kids ask for band-aids all the time! Buying ones with cartoons would have been better all around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I think the best solution with band-aids is picking a colored or patterned kind, then you don´t even expect it to match skin. I thought of this when working at a school where most students were black and all the boxes of band-aids were that typical light fleshy color. And kids ask for band-aids all the time! Buying ones with cartoons would have been better all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Well I am glad you understand now?!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Well I am glad you understand now?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Village Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The models&#039; expressions are more appropriate for attending a funeral than a wedding. Or maybe for an arranged marriage; they look as happy as a friend of mine did when her parents told her they&#039;d put a &quot;wanted&quot; ad in the paper back in Singapore for her listing her academic credentials in order to attract worthy potential husbands (that was 10 years ago, she&#039;s still single and loving it). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The models&#8217; expressions are more appropriate for attending a funeral than a wedding. Or maybe for an arranged marriage; they look as happy as a friend of mine did when her parents told her they&#8217;d put a &#8220;wanted&#8221; ad in the paper back in Singapore for her listing her academic credentials in order to attract worthy potential husbands (that was 10 years ago, she&#8217;s still single and loving it). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I suspect pduggie has never stood in a cosmetics aisle and looked at the shelves of foundation. Anyone who has ever tried to match foundation to their skin tone knows just what a wide variety there are even within what we consider &quot;white&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I suspect pduggie has never stood in a cosmetics aisle and looked at the shelves of foundation. Anyone who has ever tried to match foundation to their skin tone knows just what a wide variety there are even within what we consider &#8220;white&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Ivory, cream, taupe, ecru, beige, tan, champagne, peach, etc. We have plenty of words other than &quot;nude&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ivory, cream, taupe, ecru, beige, tan, champagne, peach, etc. We have plenty of words other than &#8220;nude&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prior to Victoria starting the tradition of white wedding dresses it was blue that was associated with purity and virginity as it&#039;s the color associated with the Virgin Mary.

Should my boyfriend and I decide to get married I&#039;d already decided i will not have a white wedding dress, I want to go with tophat and tails in ivory since I look terrible in pure white (and I&#039;m not fond of dresses).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to Victoria starting the tradition of white wedding dresses it was blue that was associated with purity and virginity as it&#8217;s the color associated with the Virgin Mary.</p>
<p>Should my boyfriend and I decide to get married I&#8217;d already decided i will not have a white wedding dress, I want to go with tophat and tails in ivory since I look terrible in pure white (and I&#8217;m not fond of dresses).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Absolutely! I&#039;ve always hated &quot;nude&quot; as a color description for many reasons. Look at the examples: even while they are all a light color they still a variety of colors from what I&#039;d call ivory to champagne to deep beige. It&#039;s a bad descriptor all around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Absolutely! I&#8217;ve always hated &#8220;nude&#8221; as a color description for many reasons. Look at the examples: even while they are all a light color they still a variety of colors from what I&#8217;d call ivory to champagne to deep beige. It&#8217;s a bad descriptor all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kettu</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/05/03/43743/comment-page-1/#comment-552175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kettu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=43743#comment-552175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Well, I never said they &quot;stomped around calling themselves [americanos]&quot;. I said they were perfectly happy to be identified by their continent of origin, as well as their country of origin, depending on context. Most Europeans I know are also perfectly happy to be called &quot;European&quot; when the situation arises. There are a large number of contexts where it is useful to be able to group the inhabitants of a continent together rather than naming every individual country. Furthermore, I have met many people from many countries and it is relatively rare that these people fly into a rage if you don&#039;t know what country they&#039;re from without being told. If you&#039;ve been told and you then &quot;insinuate&quot; that they&#039;re from a different country, well, that&#039;s just bizarre behaviour on your part, but has very little to do with whether someone from, say, Ecuador is happy calling themselves &quot;americano&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Well, I never said they &#8220;stomped around calling themselves [americanos]&#8221;. I said they were perfectly happy to be identified by their continent of origin, as well as their country of origin, depending on context. Most Europeans I know are also perfectly happy to be called &#8220;European&#8221; when the situation arises. There are a large number of contexts where it is useful to be able to group the inhabitants of a continent together rather than naming every individual country. Furthermore, I have met many people from many countries and it is relatively rare that these people fly into a rage if you don&#8217;t know what country they&#8217;re from without being told. If you&#8217;ve been told and you then &#8220;insinuate&#8221; that they&#8217;re from a different country, well, that&#8217;s just bizarre behaviour on your part, but has very little to do with whether someone from, say, Ecuador is happy calling themselves &#8220;americano&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
